Similar topics
Search
Latest topics
Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
Seems the new edition of their most useful book contains this statement, which is causing carpet-chewing in hateworld:
In September 2014, the day before Looking for Madeleine went on sale, a colleague let us know that members of anti- McCann Facebook groups were already labelling the book pro- McCann 'propoganda' and urging a 'fightback' . On Twitter two female anti- McCann zealots , one using the username @sweepyface- later to be identified as Brenda Leyland- the other using @portugalonline, an American maned Isabelle McFadden, discussed the notion of flooding Amazon with bad reviews. 'We need a concentrated effort on Amazon,' Leyland tweeted, 'it is really affective.'
Customer reviews on Amazon's website, which rate books by allocating stars, can have a powerful effect. Potential buyers are encouraged to say sheet a customer review of a book was helpful- or not. The more people mark a review as helpful, the more potentially that review is displayed. 'The effect of a bad review,' author Robert Groese has explained, goes far beyond the impact it gas on the author's ego.......the prominence of a book on Amazon.com is dictated by two factors: how well the book has sold and how positive the reviews are. More highly rated books are displayed more prominently, which leads to more sales.'
Brenda Leyland's and Isabelle McFadden's negative reviews, which both gave Looking for Madeleine just one star- the lowest rating- appeared rapidly on the book's Amazon sales page. Leyland also posted negative comments on some of the good reviews that had begun to appear. McFadden, who by her own admission did not have the book, based her 'review' on fifty pages she said had been emailed to her. 'I urge anyone in a position to do so,' Leyland tweeted, ' to comment on Amazon in response to the S&S ( Summers and Swann) book.......the star ratings are going down.'
You have to wonder why Amoral supporters are so desperate to abuse and silence anyone that doesn't agree with their rather sick worldview.
What are they so scared of? After all, they're the ones that are forever screeching about Free Speach and je suis Charlie, etc- until someone dares criticise their beloved Gonzo.
In September 2014, the day before Looking for Madeleine went on sale, a colleague let us know that members of anti- McCann Facebook groups were already labelling the book pro- McCann 'propoganda' and urging a 'fightback' . On Twitter two female anti- McCann zealots , one using the username @sweepyface- later to be identified as Brenda Leyland- the other using @portugalonline, an American maned Isabelle McFadden, discussed the notion of flooding Amazon with bad reviews. 'We need a concentrated effort on Amazon,' Leyland tweeted, 'it is really affective.'
Customer reviews on Amazon's website, which rate books by allocating stars, can have a powerful effect. Potential buyers are encouraged to say sheet a customer review of a book was helpful- or not. The more people mark a review as helpful, the more potentially that review is displayed. 'The effect of a bad review,' author Robert Groese has explained, goes far beyond the impact it gas on the author's ego.......the prominence of a book on Amazon.com is dictated by two factors: how well the book has sold and how positive the reviews are. More highly rated books are displayed more prominently, which leads to more sales.'
Brenda Leyland's and Isabelle McFadden's negative reviews, which both gave Looking for Madeleine just one star- the lowest rating- appeared rapidly on the book's Amazon sales page. Leyland also posted negative comments on some of the good reviews that had begun to appear. McFadden, who by her own admission did not have the book, based her 'review' on fifty pages she said had been emailed to her. 'I urge anyone in a position to do so,' Leyland tweeted, ' to comment on Amazon in response to the S&S ( Summers and Swann) book.......the star ratings are going down.'
You have to wonder why Amoral supporters are so desperate to abuse and silence anyone that doesn't agree with their rather sick worldview.
What are they so scared of? After all, they're the ones that are forever screeching about Free Speach and je suis Charlie, etc- until someone dares criticise their beloved Gonzo.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6589&start=1000
Quote:
In their eagerness to prove Summers & Swan book a flop they seem to have ignored that flops don't run to a second edition.
In their eagerness to paint Brenda Leyland a misunderstood saint they object to her open trolling of the Amazon reviews section being pointed out, despite it being there for everyone to see.
In their eagerness to diss what informed, intelligent people have known since 2008 - that the forensic reports 'amount to a whole lot of nothing' - they are now roping in another two eminent scientists (one Irish) to their giant, ever-widening conspiracy.
Quite.
Quote:
In their eagerness to prove Summers & Swan book a flop they seem to have ignored that flops don't run to a second edition.
In their eagerness to paint Brenda Leyland a misunderstood saint they object to her open trolling of the Amazon reviews section being pointed out, despite it being there for everyone to see.
In their eagerness to diss what informed, intelligent people have known since 2008 - that the forensic reports 'amount to a whole lot of nothing' - they are now roping in another two eminent scientists (one Irish) to their giant, ever-widening conspiracy.
Quite.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
Incidentally, normal, decent people would agree that anyone that uses language such as this leading Amaral supporter:
is a troll of the most repulsive kind.
is a troll of the most repulsive kind.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
Summers and Swan really have the measure of the Amaral-worshipping McCann haters.
Autumn 2014 brought headlines of a very different sort, news that coincided with publication of the first edition of this book. It shone harsh light on the machinations of some McCann 'haters', people who had for years used the web to pump out vicious bile. As reported in earlier chapters, the web has harboured not only the moderate observers and enthusiastic supporters of Kate and Gerry McCann , but also many out-and-out foes.
Such individuals have poured out their poison on platforms like Facebook and Twitter, the rise and rise of which have coincided with the years since Madeleine's disappearance. Constantly evolving, the explosion of social media has enabled users to connect with like-minded individuals instantaneously, often anonymously- and outpaced law enforcements ability to police it. It was a raw example of this phenomenon of our time, in the context of the Madeleine case, that attracted attention in late 2014.
To many of the online 'antis', it has seemed not to matter that Gerry and Kate McCann are the distressed parents of a missing child, a couple not known to have committed any wrongdoing. Their friends and acquaintances, including those who accompanied them on the ill-fated holiday in 2007, Gerry's sister Philomena- CEOP's former chief Jim Gamble- have also suffered abuse. Publication of this book made the author's targets too.
'Pouring out their poison' - a perfect description.
Autumn 2014 brought headlines of a very different sort, news that coincided with publication of the first edition of this book. It shone harsh light on the machinations of some McCann 'haters', people who had for years used the web to pump out vicious bile. As reported in earlier chapters, the web has harboured not only the moderate observers and enthusiastic supporters of Kate and Gerry McCann , but also many out-and-out foes.
Such individuals have poured out their poison on platforms like Facebook and Twitter, the rise and rise of which have coincided with the years since Madeleine's disappearance. Constantly evolving, the explosion of social media has enabled users to connect with like-minded individuals instantaneously, often anonymously- and outpaced law enforcements ability to police it. It was a raw example of this phenomenon of our time, in the context of the Madeleine case, that attracted attention in late 2014.
To many of the online 'antis', it has seemed not to matter that Gerry and Kate McCann are the distressed parents of a missing child, a couple not known to have committed any wrongdoing. Their friends and acquaintances, including those who accompanied them on the ill-fated holiday in 2007, Gerry's sister Philomena- CEOP's former chief Jim Gamble- have also suffered abuse. Publication of this book made the author's targets too.
'Pouring out their poison' - a perfect description.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
On Twitter two female anti- McCann zealots , one using the username @sweepyface- later to be identified as Brenda Leyland- the other using @portugalonline, an American maned Isabelle McFadden, discussed the notion of flooding Amazon with bad reviews.
There is something that S&S don't seem to have picked up on - that McFadden was also 'Kiki', and trolled all sorts of people under that name. And that McFadden/Kiki's activities are one of the main reasons Morais has virtually retired.
There is something that S&S don't seem to have picked up on - that McFadden was also 'Kiki', and trolled all sorts of people under that name. And that McFadden/Kiki's activities are one of the main reasons Morais has virtually retired.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
McFadden is a nasty piece of work but there again, she is a druggie. So what can you expect?
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
Good post on Injustice:
Ignoring the dishonesty, there is something rather desperate and malign about people who organised themselves to post bad reviews about a book they have neither purchased or read, because someone has told them the content confirms the inaccuracy of much of the material they have used to construct a hostile campaign against the parents of a missing child.
Their demand allegedly for Justice and Freedom of Speech is rather at odds with the way in which they revel in the metaphorical Amazon book burning combined with their disregard for right to the presumption of innocence shows them in a rather hypocritical light.
One wonders why they fail to grasp that ... everyone else does.
Ignoring the dishonesty, there is something rather desperate and malign about people who organised themselves to post bad reviews about a book they have neither purchased or read, because someone has told them the content confirms the inaccuracy of much of the material they have used to construct a hostile campaign against the parents of a missing child.
Their demand allegedly for Justice and Freedom of Speech is rather at odds with the way in which they revel in the metaphorical Amazon book burning combined with their disregard for right to the presumption of innocence shows them in a rather hypocritical light.
One wonders why they fail to grasp that ... everyone else does.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
So, citizen churnalist aka Lime_Harry of the Hounders, and confidante of some of the nastiest haters on tw@tter, is now trying to pretend that the attacks on children in the PDL area didn't happen.
Is she being paid to cover up Gonzo's incompetence? Or is she just as thick and nasty as the rest of the Gonzo fan club?
Either way, it doesn't say much for her integrity.
Is she being paid to cover up Gonzo's incompetence? Or is she just as thick and nasty as the rest of the Gonzo fan club?
Either way, it doesn't say much for her integrity.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: Summers and Swan, on organised attacks by haters
Either way, it doesn't say much for her integrity.
Proves that she has none, in fact.
I wonder if she will be paid out of the new fund?
Proves that she has none, in fact.
I wonder if she will be paid out of the new fund?
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Similar topics
» TWO BOMBING ATTACKS AT BRUSSELS AIRPORT - DEAD AND INJURED
» Child abuse in Portugal
» ARSON ATTACKS IN LOS ANGELES
» Child abuse in Portugal
» ARSON ATTACKS IN LOS ANGELES
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:43 pm by Pedro Silva
» help Liam Scott
Sat May 02, 2020 1:05 pm by Pedro Silva
» WE STILL HOPE' Madeleine McCann parents vow to keep searching for their daughter in emotional Christmas message
Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:37 am by Pedro Silva
» Candles site
Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:40 pm by Pedro Silva
» Madeleine McCann's parents urge holidaymakers to take posters abroad with them this summer in bid to find their daughter
Sat Aug 03, 2019 7:33 pm by Pedro Silva
» Madeleine McCann investigation gets more funding
Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:44 pm by Pedro Silva
» new suspect in Madeleine McCann
Sun May 05, 2019 3:18 pm by Sabot
» NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY
Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:02 pm by Pedro Silva
» SUN, STAR: 'Cristovao goes on trial' - organised home invasions, etc
Sat Apr 20, 2019 7:54 am by Sabot