Similar topics
Search
Latest topics
CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
2 posters
Page 1 of 1
CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
http://www.cmjornal.xl.pt/detalhe/noticias/nacional/portugal/amaral-perde--e-paga-custas
Amaral loses and pays costs
The lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and university professor António Pedro Dores were acquitted yesterday in the Court of Faro, the libel in an action brought by a former Inspector of Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral. The defendants were also acquitted of the claim of € 3,000. Gonçalo Amaral was ordered to pay court fees.
Aragão Correia was charged with having published a report in April 2008 on behalf of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED), chaired by Mr Dores, in which he accused of having assisted Amaral "so complacent" to the tortures that Leonor off target, carried out by their subordinates. This second report which was made by Leonor Cipriano.
The court found that Anthony Dores "had no knowledge of the report" and that Aragão Correia "acted in pursuit of legitimate interests, convinced that the testimony of Leonor Cipriano was true, so acquitted both defendants.
Portuguese original:
Amaral perde e paga custas
O advogado Marcos Aragão Correia e o professor universitário António Pedro Dores foram ontem absolvidos, no Tribunal de Faro, do crime de difamação, numa acção interposta pelo ex-inspector da Polícia Judiciária Gonçalo Amaral. Os réus foram igualmente absolvidos do pedido de indemnização de 3000 €. Gonçalo Amaral foi condenado a pagar as custas do tribunal.
Aragão Correia era acusado de ter publicado um relatório, em Abril de 2008, em nome da Associação Contra a Exclusão pelo Desenvolvimento (ACED), presidida por António Dores, em que acusava Amaral de ter assistido "de forma complacente" às torturas de que Leonor fora alvo, levadas a cabo pelos seus subordinados. Isto segundo relato que lhe foi feito por Leonor Cipriano.
O tribunal considerou que António Dores "não tinha conhecimento do relatório" e que Aragão Correia "agiu na prossecução de interesses legítimos, convencido de que o depoimento de Leonor Cipriano era verdadeiro, pelo que absolveu ambos os arguidos.
Clear enough? Good!
Amaral loses and pays costs
The lawyer Marcos Aragão Correia and university professor António Pedro Dores were acquitted yesterday in the Court of Faro, the libel in an action brought by a former Inspector of Judicial Police Gonçalo Amaral. The defendants were also acquitted of the claim of € 3,000. Gonçalo Amaral was ordered to pay court fees.
Aragão Correia was charged with having published a report in April 2008 on behalf of the Association Against Exclusion for Development (ACED), chaired by Mr Dores, in which he accused of having assisted Amaral "so complacent" to the tortures that Leonor off target, carried out by their subordinates. This second report which was made by Leonor Cipriano.
The court found that Anthony Dores "had no knowledge of the report" and that Aragão Correia "acted in pursuit of legitimate interests, convinced that the testimony of Leonor Cipriano was true, so acquitted both defendants.
Portuguese original:
Amaral perde e paga custas
O advogado Marcos Aragão Correia e o professor universitário António Pedro Dores foram ontem absolvidos, no Tribunal de Faro, do crime de difamação, numa acção interposta pelo ex-inspector da Polícia Judiciária Gonçalo Amaral. Os réus foram igualmente absolvidos do pedido de indemnização de 3000 €. Gonçalo Amaral foi condenado a pagar as custas do tribunal.
Aragão Correia era acusado de ter publicado um relatório, em Abril de 2008, em nome da Associação Contra a Exclusão pelo Desenvolvimento (ACED), presidida por António Dores, em que acusava Amaral de ter assistido "de forma complacente" às torturas de que Leonor fora alvo, levadas a cabo pelos seus subordinados. Isto segundo relato que lhe foi feito por Leonor Cipriano.
O tribunal considerou que António Dores "não tinha conhecimento do relatório" e que Aragão Correia "agiu na prossecução de interesses legítimos, convencido de que o depoimento de Leonor Cipriano era verdadeiro, pelo que absolveu ambos os arguidos.
Clear enough? Good!
Last edited by bb1 on Fri May 15, 2015 2:41 pm; edited 2 times in total
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
Same story:
http://www.jn.pt/PaginaInicial/Seguranca/Interior.aspx?content_id=2670936&page=-1
Quote:
The Public Ministry (MP) asked for the acquittal of both, claiming that no longer makes sense to talk about defamation, since all the evidence pointed to the existence of torture, despite never having tasted exactly your own.
Amaral hasn't been 'cleared' of torture; he wasn't in the dock, for once - he brought this ridiculous case. Which is why he now has to pay for it.
Evidence was heard in court that he was physically involved in torture, but new charges will have to be laid against him before that can be dealt with.
The judge did, however, agree with both the prosecutor and the defence that torture had occurred - which is why Gonc has been left with the bill for the entire proceedings.
Is that simple enough, even for forkers?
http://www.jn.pt/PaginaInicial/Seguranca/Interior.aspx?content_id=2670936&page=-1
Quote:
The Public Ministry (MP) asked for the acquittal of both, claiming that no longer makes sense to talk about defamation, since all the evidence pointed to the existence of torture, despite never having tasted exactly your own.
Amaral hasn't been 'cleared' of torture; he wasn't in the dock, for once - he brought this ridiculous case. Which is why he now has to pay for it.
Evidence was heard in court that he was physically involved in torture, but new charges will have to be laid against him before that can be dealt with.
The judge did, however, agree with both the prosecutor and the defence that torture had occurred - which is why Gonc has been left with the bill for the entire proceedings.
Is that simple enough, even for forkers?
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
This is hilarious to watch, though it is so braindead, it is almost sad.....
Bewildered forker:
so what you are saying is the tv1 ref
is a fake and there was no transcript of the Trial?
Please, someone tell her, it's no fake, and that it is all over the Portuguese media
This is Morais' fault, you know, for censoring news she doesn't like.
Bewildered forker:
so what you are saying is the tv1 ref
is a fake and there was no transcript of the Trial?
Please, someone tell her, it's no fake, and that it is all over the Portuguese media
This is Morais' fault, you know, for censoring news she doesn't like.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
Why did Gonzo choose to LOSE the case he himself brought against Marcos Correia and others, instead of playing that fabled Ace?
These muppets throwing money at him know NOTHING about him, or his past misdeeds.
PS - has he paid these court costs yet, as ordered by the judge in 2012?
These muppets throwing money at him know NOTHING about him, or his past misdeeds.
PS - has he paid these court costs yet, as ordered by the judge in 2012?
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
Quote from: Angelo222 on Today at 01:01:44 PM
You conveniently forget the Metodo/Correia affair, the ace in his hand.
But strangely, forgot to play this fabled Ace when he took Marcos Correia to court. And lost.
Odd the way Gonzo prefers to lose court cases and get stuck with HUGE bills, rather than play that Ace.
You conveniently forget the Metodo/Correia affair, the ace in his hand.
But strangely, forgot to play this fabled Ace when he took Marcos Correia to court. And lost.
Odd the way Gonzo prefers to lose court cases and get stuck with HUGE bills, rather than play that Ace.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
The Public Ministry (MP) asked for the acquittal of both, claiming that no longer makes sense to talk about defamation, since all the evidence pointed to the existence of torture
That was the Portuguese authorities asking for the men Gonzo accused to be acquitted, as Leonor Cipriano was undeniably tortured; the only unknown is, By whom?
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: CdM: AMARAL LOSES TO CORREIA AND PAYS COSTS
Ha Amoral landed on his Ace in fact?
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Similar topics
» Disaster for Amaral - Prosecutor Backs Marcos Correia, Professor Dores
» Syrian terrorists being trained by US
» McCann-haters in a frenzy over Marcos Correia
» Syrian terrorists being trained by US
» McCann-haters in a frenzy over Marcos Correia
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|
Sun Dec 06, 2020 6:43 pm by Pedro Silva
» help Liam Scott
Sat May 02, 2020 1:05 pm by Pedro Silva
» WE STILL HOPE' Madeleine McCann parents vow to keep searching for their daughter in emotional Christmas message
Thu Dec 26, 2019 9:37 am by Pedro Silva
» Candles site
Fri Sep 20, 2019 6:40 pm by Pedro Silva
» Madeleine McCann's parents urge holidaymakers to take posters abroad with them this summer in bid to find their daughter
Sat Aug 03, 2019 7:33 pm by Pedro Silva
» Madeleine McCann investigation gets more funding
Wed Jun 05, 2019 10:44 pm by Pedro Silva
» new suspect in Madeleine McCann
Sun May 05, 2019 3:18 pm by Sabot
» NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY
Sat Apr 20, 2019 8:02 pm by Pedro Silva
» SUN, STAR: 'Cristovao goes on trial' - organised home invasions, etc
Sat Apr 20, 2019 7:54 am by Sabot