Search
 
 

Display results as :
 


Rechercher Advanced Search

Latest topics
» Corruption in Portimao and Portugal
Yesterday at 11:01 pm by Max

» Jerry Lewis, Mercurial Comedian and Filmmaker, Dies at 91
Yesterday at 9:20 pm by bb1

» Terrrorist attack in Barcelona
Yesterday at 9:19 pm by bb1

» U.S. Warship Indianapolis Found 18,000 Feet Deep in Pacific Ocean
Yesterday at 5:50 pm by Pedro Silva

» Military coup underway in Turkey
Yesterday at 4:20 pm by bb1

» THE TRUMP DISASTER AREA
Yesterday at 9:05 am by bb1

» BREXIT: UP-TO-DATE NEWS AS IT HAPPENS
Yesterday at 7:36 am by Lamplighter

» Several wounded in Russian knife attack, attacker shot dead
Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:40 pm by bb1

» Candles site
Sat Aug 19, 2017 9:13 pm by Pedro Silva

Navigation
 Portal
 Index
 Memberlist
 Profile
 FAQ
 Search
Affiliates
free forum


Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Page 1 of 34 1, 2, 3 ... 17 ... 34  Next

View previous topic View next topic Go down

Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:03 pm

As predicted:

In answer to the question: When can I see your Madeleine #McCann documentary?

I write this with some trepidation, knowing full well it will be examined to within an inch of life. And not always by friendly and welcoming eyes.

Myself and a production crew have been filming this documentary for over seven months. Initially we planned to do the whole thing, start to finish, in a couple of months.

Events changed that.

The story developed. Brenda Leyland's inquest was delayed until March 2015, we waited for the Gonçalo Amaral Lisbon result, I waited for various responses and FOIs (delayed, again) to come in.

Just to make this clear. This documentary is not a YouTube video. It has been made to specific broadcasting standards and the process involved is considerably more time-consuming and costly than that involved in a YouTube which (as I know well) is essentially a record-edit-upload process.

If only it were that straightforward.

But then this is a media story that needs to go beyond online and into the mainstream media. That's what online campaigners tell me all the time - and they are right.

I have worked in msm for decades and I also make You Tubes, I love doing it all, but the former requires such stringent disciplines and standards to be met, legally, technically and visually, that I knew I needed a production company to back me making this film.

For the reality is - and anyone who knows this case will also know there are media and legal issues attached - I am loathe to give away too much information because I am aware of how problematic that could be for us.

From the outset I knew I would struggle to get a broadcaster to fund it the way I realised, over a number of years, that the story needed to be told.

I had already been warned off by a msm producer of my acquaintance. Other colleagues (and journalist friends) have expressed similar concerns about my curiosity of the case over the years.

In order to make this documentary I needed to be able to take a package to a broadcaster. It could not be footage, to be chopped and edited according to someone else's idea of how it should be portrayed, but a complete, honest and whole film package that I would not allow to be tampered with.

If you know how msm works (and I mean REALLY know) you will know this requirement of mine is me coming with A VERY TALL ORDER, indeed. But then you will also know that that is what this story requires.

The disappearance of Madeleine McCann - and the multiple issues attached to that - is a story that very much needs updating in the way the public perceive it.

I was inspired, as a journalist and broadcaster, to pursue this by the shocking (and I'm still shocked) death of Brenda Leyland. I address this tragedy fully in the film and over the course of months as I, and a small camera crew, attended her inquests.

People will be left in no doubt about my position on Brenda Leyland - and about the events that led to her death, and those events subsequent to her death.

Let me say this at this point:

Yes, I am a professional journalist - despite detractors trying every trick to undermine my hard won and decent reputation in my industry - but I am also passionate as well as professional.

Those who oppose this documentary, and there are a few, have tried to use that against me. They have failed. I am proud to be emotionally engaged with my work, I do not want to be one of those 'professionals' who are so 'professional' that they can do a job like, say, watch child abuse images without so much as a flicker of emotion.

I don't want to be the type of person who is able to emotionally detach from the wickedness of the world in the course of their 'job'. We should never acclimatise to what is wrong, that's how I see my work. I view passion as a help not a hindrance, a strength not a weakness.

Anyone who knows me will know this and in this film I make that point very clearly.

I do this by going to the people at the heart of this story (while being clear not to interfere in any way with the ongoing police investigation) and by asking questions of public interest. (Many millions of pounds of public interest, in fact, and that's just the financial cost of this case to the public).

In this documentary, I tackle the anomalies that exist. All the stuff that is in the public domain - only you wouldn't know it judging by the lack of real investigation media organisations have conducted around this case. On that point, at least, I agree with Clarence Mitchell - the McCann's spokesman who appears in the documentary.

So, forgive me for going the long way around answering the question: when will your documentary be aired?

The short answer is I can't yet tell you. At the moment. That's me being as transparent as I can without giving ammunition to the enemies of this project.

The film is, and has been for weeks, in post-production. We have started broadcast meetings about it. Several broadcast executives have expressed a keen interest in getting involved. Myself, and a small trusted team, are (through necessity) playing our cards close to our collective chests.

Those who want justice for Madeleine McCann will understand and appreciate that. Those with other agendas, will not. Either way, we get to know who's who.

This documentary has taught me so much and not least that the enemies of it are not always immediately identifiable. I have learnt that there are detractors who claim to be on the side of justice for Madeleine McCann - in terms of finding out what happened and where she might be - but are, in actuality, the opposite.

Some of these have already become the most vocal and scathing opponents of a film - this film - that has yet to be aired. Odd behaviour. Or maybe not.

Finally, I would like to say a big thank you to every single person who has informed me on the intricacies of this story - and also made me aware of the many dubious and opportunistic characters who surround it.

This experience has been an education - a harrowing and sad one, at times - and one I believe I have conveyed in our film for the public, at large, who are not clued-up like many of those online.

Thank you for your patience. As soon as I have broadcast details, I will let you know.

Oh, and one more thing, we will shortly release a two-minute trailer to social media to give people a flavour of what to expect. Again, I have to wait for the go-ahead but as soon as I can, I will.

Have a lovely week.
Sonia X

Sonia Poulton
June 8, 2015


Dancing Dancing Dancing Dancing Dancing Dancing


Last edited by bb1 on Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:35 pm; edited 3 times in total

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:04 pm

made me aware of the many dubious and opportunistic characters who surround it

Oh, the irony! rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:24 pm

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1247-when-can-i-see-your-madeleine-mccann-documentary-poulton-responds

Also here, for your delectation. Oh, and the Source is Sonz's Twitlonger.

http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1smj42h

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:46 pm


_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:46 pm

I have worked in msm for decades and I also make You Tubes, I love doing it all, but the former requires such stringent disciplines and standards to be met, legally, technically and visually, that I knew I needed a production company to back me making this film.

She should have no problem in letting us have a complete list of her credits then.

Also, am really interested in what legals she has sought to date.  

If you know how msm works (and I mean REALLY know) you will know this requirement of mine is me coming with A VERY TALL ORDER, indeed. But then you will also know that that is what this story requires.

Some of us do exactly know.  I also know how TV stations function blah blah blah.

The film is, and has been for weeks, in post-production.


What a load of BS.   She is NOT James Cameron making Avatar.  
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:55 pm

I don't think singing the praises of gansta rappers, and then doing mis-mem tales of woe for the Mail, actually counts as much of a resume, does it, Lily?

Several broadcast executives have expressed a keen interest in getting involved.

Of course they have. And no doubt they also said for her not to call them, they'd call her. Incidentally, whatever happened to the 'commission' from a real, live company - in the US, no less - she was claimed as having previously?

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 4:58 pm

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&start=650

Re: Sonia Poulton - clearly not what most call a real journa
Postby scoobydoo » Mon Jun 08, 2015 3:41 pm

Bb1 just posted a statement from poulton regarding her documentary.
It drones on but the upshot is that she doesn't have a broadcaster. Nor, going by the statement, does she have any idea how documentaries are made and sold. It sounds a real hotchpot. Seven months of filming ( that's an obscene amount), she's telling the story of Brenda Leyland as well as the story of Madeleine McCann's disappearance. She's not trying to interfere in the investigation but feel the public need answers not least because the police investigation cost money. So complete contradiction there then. But going by her logic that if public money is spent on something the public should be given every detail we can look forward to the gory details if she every has piles treated on the NHS.
I also don't see how as well as harping on about Brenda Leyland she is going to find out madeleines whereabouts and then broadcast it. If she truely knows the answer then she is required by law to tell either the Portuguese or UK police. If she gained any new information then she has to by law hand this over to the police and wait for their OK to broadcast. If she has no new information then it appears she is just recurgitating information already in the public domain which is known to the police who not only have the correct PJ files professionally translated have more information not released publicly including the current PJ investigation.

So it sounds like a bunch of wannabes running around with a cheap camera talking to sad cases about stuff they read on the internet, and no one wants to bother broadcasting it.


Yup.

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  Lamplighter on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:01 pm

scoobydoo » Mon Jun 08, 2015 3:41 pm
Bb1 just posted a statement from poulton regarding her documentary.
It drones on but the upshot is that she doesn't have a broadcaster. Nor, going by the statement, does she have any idea how documentaries are made and sold. It sounds a real hotchpot. Seven months of filming ( that's an obscene amount), she's telling the story of Brenda Leyland as well as the story of Madeleine McCann's disappearance. She's not trying to interfere in the investigation but feel the public need answers not least because the police investigation cost money. So complete contradiction there then. But going by her logic that if public money is spent on something the public should be given every detail we can look forward to the gory details if she every has piles treated on the NHS.
I also don't see how as well as harping on about Brenda Leyland she is going to find out madeleines whereabouts and then broadcast it. If she truely knows the answer then she is required by law to tell either the Portuguese or UK police. If she gained any new information then she has to by law hand this over to the police and wait for their OK to broadcast. If she has no new information then it appears she is just recurgitating information already in the public domain which is known to the police who not only have the correct PJ files professionally translated have more information not released publicly including the current PJ investigation.

So it sounds like a bunch of wannabes running around with a cheap camera talking to sad cases about stuff they read on the internet, and no one wants to bother broadcasting it.
Good comment from scoobydoo. LL
avatar
Lamplighter
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : I am the Judge, Jury and Executioner
Join date : 2011-06-24
Age : 77

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:05 pm

Agree 100% with scoobydoo.  

Poulton clearly doesn't seem to know the correct way of getting programs aired.   She has, in fact, appeared to have put the cart before the horse in too many places.
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:08 pm

bb1 wrote:I don't think singing the praises of gansta rappers, and then doing mis-mem tales of woe for the Mail, actually counts as much of a resume, does it, Lily?

Several broadcast executives have expressed a keen interest in getting involved.

Of course they have. And no doubt they also said for her not to call them, they'd call her. Incidentally, whatever happened to the 'commission' from a real, live company - in the US, no less - she was claimed as having previously?
No they do not, Bonny.  

A commission from the US?  Oh yes, I remember now.  No one I knows seems to have heard of it but then that is what I expected.  biggrin
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:16 pm

xxxxxxxxxhttp://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t530p120-sonia-poulton-doorsteps-kate-for-new-documentary


Cristobell wrote:
Sonia Poulton is a respected, not a so called, journalist who has been commissioned to make a documentary that a lot of people do not want to see aired


liar liar liar liar

It has now become clear that, not only was Poulton NOT 'commissioned' to do any such thing, she can't even get real broadcasters interested.

Maybe she should just make it an expose of McCann-hating trolls and loonies? Sky, etc., would be happy to pay for that.

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:20 pm

Same link, same person:



I don't know who is financing the documentary, but it is being made for mainstream television, and if the timing is right, it could well go global.



_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:29 pm

Of course it will.

 rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl roflrofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 5:53 pm

Nice catch by Myths:

Sonia Poulton
‏@SoniaPoulton
@Lanniea1973 we start having broadcast meetings next week, info to follow
Reply Retweet Favorite
More
FAVORITES
2
Eileen Plater Ltd
2:55 AM - 6 Jan 2015


What were they doing back in January, sitting around discussing who'd they'd like to broadcast it, in a world of rainbows and unicorns? rofl rofl rofl

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:04 pm

OMG.  What a disgraceful operation they are.  Don't call us........ rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:25 pm

All is not lost, Lily, we have a two minute trailer of Mutton rabbitting on about 'squishing' to look forward to. So it's all good!

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 6:34 pm

I think I understand now, Bonny.  She has made it into a full on comedy.   rofl rofl rofl
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:02 pm

Pamela Gurney Before the McCann case had we ever heard the name Sonia Poulton? I think not. She jumped on a bandwagon firstly via Icke TV interviewing Linda Hutton and when that fell through in a very nasty way she has had to find some other way of getting her name known so has pursued her own methods of trying to produce some documentary.
18 mins · Like

Cass Sidebotham She's crowing about you being identified and involved in whatever it is she thinks she has discovered. Surely someone can't just claim shit that's not true on a documentary!?
14 mins · Edited · Like

Pamela Gurney Well who knows. She is potty enough to.


Yup.

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:09 pm

What would any media outlet have to say about all that?  Pcorneater
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:33 pm

Er, Don't call us, we'll call you?

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  Sabot on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:34 pm

Oh, do come on. That's the best bit of vaguely articulate bull shit that I have ever seen. And it's even got a bit of heart.
I am sorry that Brenda Leyland felt the need to kill herself. Aren't we all.

But apart from that it says nothing.

Will she expose those who she seems to think of as Trolls? Almost certainly not. She certainly won't be exposing me because everyone already knows who I am, so that would be a dead duck.

So what does she think she will do? Oh, okay, expose The McCanns. I don't think so.

Is anyone else worried about being exposed?
avatar
Sabot
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : Bretagne
Join date : 2011-06-24
Age : 78

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:46 pm

She seems to have been getting all her info from loonies like Butler and Mutton, with some of the nastiest mult-headed hatertrolls around giving her a hand, so Lord knows what deranged allegations she's going to make.

It's glaringly obvious that she doesn't bother to do the most basic genuine research or fact-checking. Look at the fool she made of herself over Bennett and his payments to Carter Ruck, simply because she didn't bother to read Judge Tugendhat's court judgement.

No, basic fact-checking would have been too hard, so much easier to get into a bitchfest about Bennett with her BFF Hutton.

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:49 pm

No, basic fact-checking would have been too hard, so much easier to get into a bitchfest about Bennett with her BFF Hutton.


Isn't that the truth?  Hope she doesn't have the nerve to call herself an investigative journalist.  Pcorneater
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  bb1 on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:53 pm

I wonder if the pair of them have the slightest idea how stupid and nasty they looked as soon as Bennett posted his bank statement? Anyone that imagines either of them have the slightest credibility after that is, frankly, living in La-Land.

_________________
__________________________

Few will weep tears for Amaral, seeing an angry man locked up in his own bitter and baseless theories
. -Neil Tweedie, Daily Mail, of the McCanns' tormentor Gonzo.
avatar
bb1
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  lily on Mon Jun 08, 2015 8:55 pm

They are a match made on a hater site.  Pcorneater
avatar
lily
Slayer of scums
Slayer of scums

Join date : 2011-06-24

Back to top Go down

Re: Exciting, or rather, NOT exciting news of the Sonumentary

Post  Sponsored content


Sponsored content


Back to top Go down

Page 1 of 34 1, 2, 3 ... 17 ... 34  Next

View previous topic View next topic Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum