When child trafficking wears a disguise: The case of Madeleine McCann

My friends, this was taken from The Washington Times:

http://communities.washingtontimes.com/neighborhood/heart-without-compromise-children-and-children-wit/2012/sep/22/when-child-trafficking-wears-disguise-case-madelei/

Many thanks, Pedro. I am not reproducing it, it is best read in place.

However, I am moving it to the main forum, as Birch has turned up on not-Bennett's site again, ranting about it and claiming Clarence Mitchell made the author write it.

Re: Investigator ensures that Maddie's body in the backyard of Murat
LEACHATE Today at 9:36 pm

Of course it's a sh*t article, it's written to counter the arrticle in teh Huffington Post where it is stated that I found MADELEINE under Murats rear GRAVEL driveway, why do you think Clarence Mitchell got the WASHINGTON post to quickly do the article after David Lohr wrote about me. Coincidence no.

And not 1 single person in this forum has had the brains to look carefully at my photo's in the Huffington Post US article and look at what's inside of the squares.Clearly this forums made up of a bunch of idiots.

Stephen D. Birch

He's right about that bit, anyway.

You wlecome my friend.

birch is:

I know, Pedro. The article isn't funny, it's a very serious subject.

But the idea that Clarence Mitchell somehow forced the Post to write it after he appeared in Huffington, is being bonkers.

So The Washington Times is IN IT now. I wonder how The McCanns managed that?

I am only going to say this once. The Portuguese Judiciary has rechecked the area and ascertained there is no body of any kind where Birch claims one to be.

big true crazytony, which proves that birch is a liar, a fame-seeker.

crazytony wrote:I am only going to say this once. The Portuguese Judiciary has rechecked the area and ascertained there is no body of any kind where Birch claims one to be.

Quite, Tony.

Mind you, it's scarey to realise that even he thinks the hounders are a bunch of half-wits.

PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB
Most ignorant US article ever about #Madeleine #McCann and from my hometown paper. Appalling

Yeah, yeah, whatever.

PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB, this is what you can do with your unwelcome opinion: shove it up your ****.

Was that The Washington Times? Not The Washington Post, by the way.
The poor, silly cow picked a loser, again. Sadly, she has picked too many losers. She is a Fame Hound, and barking with it. Some small town American housewife who sought fame for her own sake, against all sane probabilities. It's the likes of her and Nancy Grace that get innocent people convicted in the court of public opinion in America.
But the tide turned with The Anthony Case. America is thoroughly fed up with what the likes of her try to do. And with grandstanding Prosecutors who lie in Court. And believe me, The Prosecution did lie when they bloody well knew that they were lying. I watched them do it.
Justice is never served by such as this.
Pat Brown is on her way out, and so is Nancy Grace. Pat Brown will never sue The McCanns. Carter Ruck are much smarter than she will ever be. And they don't ever rely on lies.
I have often wondered about American Prosecution Attorneys, and their ability to present totally flawed cases, and this has really worried me because I do believe that America is a good place to be, or at least it should be. They fought hard enough for it. But The Court of Public Opinion is not Justice.

Pedro Silva wrote:PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB, this is what you can do with your unwelcome opinion: shove it up your ***.

ARSE in English English has four letters, Pedro. Just saying. An ASS is a Donkey.

Well, that works too. IMO, of course.

I have realised I don't greatly care what any of them say about anything. They never have anything useful to contribute, just the same old, same old, day in, day out.

They have no importance in the real world, anyway. Bushmeat's opinion is of no more importance than any other forker, and neither the Yard nor the PJ are listening to any of them.

Stuck records, the whole lot of them.

Oh wonderful.

Chelsea Trampstamp has decided the world is waiting for her brilliant observations. She would be well advised to zip it after her horrible remarks about disabled children.

Sabot, correction made, I agree with you bb1: "Well, that works too. IMO, of course".

Nice bit of libel here from a hounder:

Re: Pat Brown doesn't like this article
bobbin Today
I suppose my first question would be, how much would a journalist get paid by interested parties to get this transparently pro-mccann article written as we approach the court case with Dr. Amaral...blah blah bah....

So, are they now claiming that US journos are being paid to write 'favourable' articles? Because if they are, they are getting into very dangerous territory.

bb1 wrote:Nice bit of libel here from a hounder:

Re: Pat Brown doesn't like this article
bobbin Today
I suppose my first question would be, how much would a journalist get paid by interested parties to get this transparently pro-mccann article written as we approach the court case with Dr. Amaral...blah blah bah....

So, are they now claiming that US journos are being paid to write 'favourable' articles? Because if they are, they are getting into very dangerous territory.

Who's "We" approaching the Court Case into Amaral's Libel? I thought that he was on his own. Or are they paying when he loses?
Bonkers, the bloody lot of them.

So, delusional Pat Brown doesn't like this article hem? Well, if she don´t like it, another reason to write it.