Just for ShuBob...

Posted by: ShuBob on August 11, 2011 9:45 AMPosted by: Modrod from Location, location on August 11, 2011 6:36 AM

You hear of such allegations about TB and you make a sensible deduction, as an outsider, that such are 'tried on'.
=========

Boo hoo Modders.

Jesse himself who made the claim admitted he suspected the allegations were untrue but was making a point. Have the Gaspars withdrawn their statements? Has TB withdrawn his allegations? Has Eddie the lawyer's lawyers denied the allegations?




I assume they can read - though in ShuBob's case, I am none too sure..

I'll put what Carter Ruck said in VERY BIG LETTERS to help the thickos:

Not only are these grotesque allegations highly defamatory of our client, they are entirely untrue

Maybe Bennett will let ShuBob share his tent after CR have finished with this matter?




ETA, all the recent CR letters:

http://jatyk.blogspot.com/2011/08/bennett-guaranteed-date-with-high-court.html

I thought that the quote was, "Education, Education, Education." But I think this might be a bit too late for that bunch.

It's actually no skin off my nose - or Ed Smethurst's - if they keep on repeating Bennett's lies and libel. It can all be used to show just how much damage Bennett's crap has caused.
Every time they do it, they are actually HELPING Carter Ruck prove their case against Bennett.
I don't suppose that has occurred to them though.

bb1 wrote:It's actually no skin off my nose - or Ed Smethurst's - if they keep on repeating Bennett's lies and libel. It can all be used to show just how much damage Bennett's crap has caused.
Every time they do it, they are actually HELPING Carter Ruck prove their case against Bennett.
I don't suppose that has occurred to them though.

I am guessing they all can only read Braille?

Well, I would have thought even they could have worked out that repeating Bennett's filth is very bad news for Bennett, and can be used against Bennett in court - but hey, why stop them, if that's what they want to do

All as thick as two short planks, you see. Keep up the good work, Y'all.

Posted by: ShuBob on August 17, 2011 10:15 PMPosted by: JL3 from Transalvania on August 17, 2011 10:09 PM

I caught your post re Madeleine's blue eye shadow being professionally applied, was that claim in the book the whole book and nothing but the book then?
=============

Hi JL. It is my understanding from someone who claims to have read the book that Kate claims in her book that Maddie's make-up in THAT picture was applied by a "professional beautician" who was visiting. I asked Modrod several days ago to confirm this but he still hasn't got to me neither have any of the couple's supporters voulunteered the information. I think that tells it's own story.

Is that idiot hoping to join Bennett in the dock? Her posts have already been kept as evidence of just how far Bennett's disgusting fantasies have now spread - and now she is repeating a story invented by the latest incarnation of Magali as truth.

There is nothing of the sort in Kate's book; Magali made it all up.

The Magali hydra invented the story to entertain the deviants on Havern - and now idiots like ShuBob are parrotting it.

Oh, that is another bit of libel which came from Havern's site, isn't it?

Yes, Bonny.

I cannot remember what she was calling herself at the time, Jayelles - she has had more names than anyone can remember.
Her usual pattern is to bounce on some site, start making OTT posts, start making disgusting posts, get banned, and back we go to square one.
That crap started on haverns, though - it was stated as a TROO FACT.

bb1 wrote:I cannot remember what she was calling herself at the time, Jayelles - she has had more names than anyone can remember.
Her usual pattern is to bounce on some site, start making OTT posts, start making disgusting posts, get banned, and back we go to square one.
That crap started on haverns, though - it was stated as a TROO FACT.

Bennett, has libeled all three, worldwide.

This crap starts on haverns and spreads outwards from there, like manure getting spread, Tony. There is not a word of truth in any of it, but that never, ever stops them.

you know, i'm 80% certain, that there was a professional visit from make-up artist who had done Madeleine's "make-up" in the book....but I have loaned the book to someone else so can't clarify that....but it's ringing a bell in my head.

If i am correct, I got the impression from the book that it was not a specific visit for Madeleine to have make-up done, it was either a visitor who just happens to be a beautician, or it was for someone else there...

I cannot even remember it being mentioned in the book, Rhodes, I've checked a few times.

bb1 wrote:I cannot even remember it being mentioned in the book, Rhodes, I've checked a few times.

it was literally a passing comment