Star story - Gonzo could stall court for FIVE YEARS

lily, bb1, your words are mine.

bb1 wrote:You mustn't say LIBEL!!!!!!!

What do you mean, I can't say LIBEL!!!!!?  

They don't know what LIBEL!!!!! is otherwise they could not believe their mouth pieces like Textusa when they tell them they can't use the word LIBEL or not LIBEL even.

I bet Textusa used the word LIBEL a lot.

          

These idiots actually think Gonzo can sue UK people that have said bad things - also known as 'telling the truth' about him.

I don't believe Dr Amaral would have any problem whatsoever in finding any number of lawyers willing to take on his case over here. Lawyers will work for anyone who has the money to pay them, that's their job and they don't care whether it's Pinochet or Abu Hamza.
As long as he can pay any law firm would welcome him with open arms, I'm sure. They aren't concerned about what the newspapers will print either, maybe they could get an injunction stopping them printing anything.  Who knows.

=====

Or even work for anyone who doesn't have the money on a contingency fee basis also known as a 'no win no fee agreement' - so long as there is a fair chance of success.

The final four words should give them a clue. Gonzo's chances of success = snowball, Hell. And have they failed to  notice that he doesn't even live here?

The final four words should give them a clue. Gonzo's chances of success = snowball, Hell. And have they failed to notice that he doesn't even live here?

            

We know they are clueless about the way of the world and they are definitely clueless about law.

They also are clueless thinking lawyers will take on anyone who pays them. The really good top ones can often take their pick and pass the ones they don't want on to other staff members.

Therefore Mr Michael Caplan QC might not be available.......    

Lawyers tend not to be too keen on lost causes that won't pay their bills from previous lawyers...

I wonder, is all this DON'T MENTION THE LIBEL rubbish part of some half-assed scheme to spin away the fact that Gonzo has lost, and knows it?

If it's forbidden to refer to the LIBEL, they can convince themselves that his literary efforts aren't a load of libellous bollox, just that they upset the McCanns, so it's all the McCanns' fault and anyway, the judge is IN IT.

That lot lie so much it's just possible it is as you have suggested, Bonny. However, I do think the media would have reported on it unless, of course, Gonzo insisted on a D ORDER?

       

Not a mere D-Notice for Gonzo, nothing but the best for him! It would have to be a super-injunction at the very least!

with the purpose of annoying the insane freaks known as antis: amaral is being judged at a libel trial due to his despicable behaviour.

bb1 wrote:Not a mere D-Notice for Gonzo, nothing but the best for him! It would have to be a super-injunction at the very least!

LIBEL problem SOLVED!!!!!       

Hounder:

Thinking about newpapers being sued, wonder how much Rocky will get from any British newspapers should he proceed with legal action?

I think they will settle out of court with Rocky, deffo.

'Rocky'? Their misplaced adoration of that oaf is clouding their judgement somewhat.     

Morais dutifully keeps on-message, with a blog entry called:


Gonçalo Amaral on the mistakes made by journalists when they state this is a libel trial, it isn't.

And he never gets anything wrong, does he?         

Rocky? They should be careful because Sylvester Stallone might sue for defaming his character.....        

As is being pointed out on Myths:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post246223.html#p246223

Troll logic

The only people in the UK Gonzo would have the slightest chance of suing in the UK are those that put his potboiler on the internet for free and committed copyright theft.

And that would be his fan club. Interestingly, his fan club never mention how angry his publishers were about the piracy, and said so at an earlier hearing. Guess that doesn't fit their script.

How does that Facebook post from Amaral fit with the Portuguese concept of Judicial Secrecy?

It doesn't, Greenink, nor with Amaral's oft-repeated mantra about Justice working in Silence. But don't confuse his fans, they're not very bright and can't remember these things.

about "Justice working in Silence", from the moment the ******* amaral was in charge until the moment he was sacked, he with his despicable behaviour was the proof against his own words, because his true purpose was only to become a celebrity. he is a insane fool that never understood that due to his nasty behaviour he was contradicting himself.

Hounder:

I still think it would be ok to wear a badge acknowledging an alliance to GA. Last night I was looking at sites who create them. round plastic type badges, simple satin sash-bow etc - none cost very much in bulk. I would try and carry this idea forward except that it may be hard to administer and we would each have to pay a small amount (say £2 / per badge ). Is it better to just show our support here in the forum? To administer this - there would need to be an address for sending the money to. Its easy not to do anything but is it better to do something.

Just make sure they're yellow - they'll match the big yellow streak down his back.

Scrounging from the numties again:



Sofia de Landerset May I seize the opportunity to thank you all personally for the moral support that has been expressed here and elsewhere, and for your donations which are hugely appreciated. The times are not easy for anyone, which makes your help even more significant. Thank you.

========

Sofia de Landerset Thank you, each and every one of you, for the ongoing moral and financial support. Times are tough everywhere and not everyone is able to contribute with a donation, BUT every single kind word counts, too. A lot. Thank you!

insane freaks of nature that is what you antis are.

bb1 wrote:Scrounging from the numties again:



Sofia de Landerset May I seize the opportunity to thank you all personally for the moral support that has been expressed here and elsewhere, and for your donations which are hugely appreciated. The times are not easy for anyone, which makes your help even more significant. Thank you.

========

Sofia de Landerset Thank you, each and every one of you, for the ongoing moral and financial support. Times are tough everywhere and not everyone is able to contribute with a donation, BUT every single kind word counts, too. A lot. Thank you!

Oh they love it. I wonder if Bennett gives him anything.   

My friends, this was taken from Algarve Daily newspaper:

http://www.algarvedailynews.com/news/2964-amaral-hits-back-at-mccanns-claims

That's that so-called reporter that's a member of not-Bennett's site again, Pedro, take it with a bucket of salt.    

Is that more wishful thinking?   

Montclair doesn't like the idea of wearing a Gonzo badge (who would)?

Sorry, but I think any idea of badges or ribbons is silly as well as useless and is as tacky as the McCanns' online store. I certainly don't think that Gonçalo Amaral would go for this and would probably be appalled. The simplist way is to contribute, no matter how small the amount, to his defend fund. Why spend money on these things when this money could go to the defence fund. It is possible that the expense of buying ribbons or badges would not be covered by income. The best is to keep it simple and limit our campaign to the defence fund.

I hope that didn't offend anyone but this is my opinion.

Handily, that means there is also no paper trail, nothing to account for where this money is going.

Why isn't pretendy 'forensic accountant' Edna O' Forker demanding to see the Gonzo Fund Accounts in the interests of transparency? Oh wait, I know, she's a hypocrite like the rest of them.

what is truly useless is the insane freaks who are kissing amaral´s dirty *** with their despicable behaviour, but that is what to expect from such ********.