ISABEL DUARTE ISSUES STATEMENT - REPLY AND CORRECTION TO CARVALHO ARTICLE ABOUT GONC'S BOOK

Oh dear.

So much for all those forker dreams of the McCanns being arrested for not giving Gonc the books back.

1. They aren't Gonc's.

2. Ms Duarte hasn't had any notification that they are supposed to be elsewhere, and Guerra & Paz don't seem to greatly care.



Oh dear.

Nothing new there then, Amaral lied again.

Nothing ever changes, does it, Tony? If one of them say water is wet, best stick your hand in first to check.

Gonçalo Amaral receives a retirement pension in the amount of € 2,039

Which converts to:

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t3858-right-of-reply-and-correction

£1,726.62 a month.

I seem to recall the Portuguese state takes about a third of that for unpaid taxes, but it still isn't exactly the breadline, is it?

bb1 wrote:Gonçalo Amaral receives a retirement pension in the amount of € 2,039

Which converts to:

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t3858-right-of-reply-and-correction

£1,726.62 a month.

I seem to recall the Portuguese state takes about a third of that for unpaid taxes, but it still isn't exactly the breadline, is it?

No Bonny, not that much

e) Gonçalo Amaral receives a retirement pension in the amount of € 2,039., which was ordered off the monthly rate of less than 0.1% of known values, received by the former inspector for the book and documentary. Moreover, on this board, impendia previously an attachment, originating in proceedings brought by the Office of Finance of Olhão, for tax debts.

Is it possible for the source of that to be found somewhere? The English (presumably an automatic translation) is so bad it is really hard to understand.

Amaral wrote a book based on lies, then followed Bennett's two based on Amaral's lies. Brown, then followed with her leaflet based on Amaral, Morais and Bennett's lies. Not one of them, have given a kindly thought to the child they have used as a cash cow. And, they have the audacity to wonder why people want to see them held to account.
Go figure!

No, Greenink, the pigeon didn't really fit with the rest of it....J4 will have the original, and maybe Pedro can smooth it a bit if he has time?

I've just reread the original piece:

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2012/02/police-cases-truth-of-lie-is-on-its-way.html

someone will reimburse me for all the wicked actions taken against me... Then, I will tell the rest”, said in a single burst Gonçalo Amaral, without accepting any further questions.

So, this 'someone' is going to give Gonc money, and THEN he'll play his non-existent Ace?

He says someone will reimburse him?
I think he may find himself in deeper trouble if it can be proved the McCanns have been libeled in that article of his.

I think, "Someone will reimburse me" means that he will get his revenge against the wicked people who have done this to him. But since as Isabel Duarte has pointed out, most of his problems arose long before The McCanns appeared on the scene. then I'm not sure who he means, although I think he is suggesting that The McCanns Done It. And when he gets his own back, then he will "Tell All".

And from what I can gather from Isabel Duarte's rebuttal, a whole wack of his earnings from the book and documentary during the first year, weren't seized at all. So heaven knows what happened to them.

But it's looking good, Folks. Amaral has repeatedly lied, and Isabel Duarte can prove it.

Yes, "Isabel Duarte can prove it".

Forker:

Ive been thinking this morning after reading a comment on Joana M site, if one court goes against the McCanns and they lose then they will start to lose them all, this got me thinking that if Tony Bennet is successful in his case with the McCannscould this be the start of the END for the McCanns?
also.......

On Joan Moris site I also and found this very interesting bit of info.........

...


Anonymous said... 2
I have just checked out Santos de Oliveira's image - Amaral's new lawyer. He looks awesomely intelligent.


Book, cover, don't judge.

Oh, and it also helps if you have a client who doesn't have a CRIMINAL record for lying.

"tvmais", a 17 issue of February 23, 2012

Am I right in thinking that it is a weekly? In which case, Ms Duarte's statement should be in this week's edition, with any luck.

Hopefully, it will follow CdM's example; they apologised most fulsomely to Marcos Correia for publishing Gonc's -untrue - version of events at his 50th birthday bash.

I've got a nasty suspicion that they won't have any choice. I doubt they want to get Sued, which is what could very well follow.

What a debacle it is all turning out to be.

It seems to be a sort of new Law of Nature, Sabot - if a forker, hounder, Goncalette or one of their idols says something, there's a lie in there, somewhere.

I do hope the whole thing appears in TV Mais - I am sure Pedro will check.

I am looking forward to the forkers coming to terms with the idea that no, the McCanns are NOT going to be arrested for not returning those books to Gonc, because

1. They aren't Gonc's.

2. No such order has been issued to date

3. Guerra & Paz don't seem to want them, anyway

And as Ms Duarte has also pointed out, no-one is stopping Gonc from earning a living.

Thinking back, there has always been something odd about that 'Appeal Court decision' - Ms Duarte knew nothing about it, but smiffy got his paws on the supposed documents?

There clearly was a court sitting of some kind, but I have never been convinced the story that was spun by Team Gonc was entirely accurate.

Gonc can't get a Job, Bonny. He might have to actually Work. Instead of spending his time "Detecting" Sea Food in Bars and such. That's why The PJ was so perfect. No effort required.

Get up. Have a Hair of the Dog or three. Sign in at The Police Station. Go to Lunch. Shuffle stuff around a desk. Go home, after calling in at the nearest Bar on the way, for Dinner and copious amounts of Booze. Where is he going to find another Job like that?

Not a thing I often say, but, well done Textusa! He/she/it has saved us the trouble of waiting any longer for Ms Duarte's Right of Reply to be published in at least one magazine - more to come, no doubt:

http://textusa.blogspot.com/


Please bear in mind that this is NOT in response to the Carvalho piece, though the letter is broadly similar, it is in response to this piece:

https://jatyk2.forumotion.co.uk/t1164-gonc-s-marriage-on-the-rocks

Here we go:

Kate e Gerald McCann respondem a Gonçalo Amaral
Jornal da Região- Oeiras
28 Fevereiro a 05 Março 2012
Pag 2



English translation (according to textusa, so it is bound to be biased).


Kate e Gerald McCann answer Gonçalo Amaral
Jornal da Regiao- Oeiras
28 February to 5 March 2012
Pg 2

“Kate and Gerald McCann, come, under the Press Law, to exercise the right of reply and rectification in relation to the extract published in issue No. 300, on page 3 under the column "Look who's talking," originated in the article in the "Nova Gente" magazine, edition of 13 February 2012, pages 86 and 87, as follows:

The title assigned to the piece, does not correspond to its content, and is intended only to "sell" its reading. This fact is evidenced right the on very first question asked and in the answer given by Gonçalo Amaral.

However, the thread of the interview, and the eighth to tenth questions seek to instill in the reader the notion that the victim of the irreparable character assassination suffered by the parents of Madeleine McCann at the hands of Gonçalo Amaral, is Gonçalo Amaral himself not whom he organized and ruthlessly destroyed.

However, the likely truth in response to the content and intent of this interview, bases itself only on the following facts:

Gonçalo Amaral got rich at the expense of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, known today that the profits derived from spreading, via all open and available media to the ex-inspector coordinator of case’s investigation, were, within only one year, at least and demonstrably, in the order of € 342,111.86.

From the cautionary injunction ordered by the 1st Civil Court of Lisbon, Gonçalo Amaral’s moiety was frozen in the single share he held in his single-name society, not preventing it from continuing to work nor preventing the referred gentleman to continue to write or engage in other tasks that he sees fit, as a citizen, even with a tainted criminal record. However, no apprehension was made of goods or financial values, which were held by that society. This society, in any of its exercises since it was established in 2008, has ever presented, even, its public accounts, contrary to what should have done.

From the amounts received from copyright, above mentioned and related with the publication of the book "True Lies" and with the aired TVI documentary and the DVD sold with the newspaper "Correio da Manha", and other activities engaged by ex-inspector Gonçalo Amaral, as well as the rights of at least six editions in foreign language of the book, it wasn’t any seized.

With regards to the villa that Gonçalo Amaral had in Urbanizacao Cerro Azul, in Quelfes, there aren’t any losses to the referred interviewee that are to be attributable to the parents of Madeleine McCann. In fact, in 2009, were on this house several mortgages pending as well as a registered asset freezing originated from a lawsuit brought by a brother of Gonçalo Amaral against him and his wife, for, demonstrably, as stated in the sentence pronounced by the 2nd Civil Court of Family and Minors Court of the District of Seixal, having sold a house to a third party, after having received the amount they should receive for it, from the mentioned brother, who had helped them pay previous debts. The parents of Madeleine McCann got to know about such action after their intervention in this was by beeing brought into it by the enforcement agent in charge, a person who also seems to have some important information about what above is explained. About this house there were pending asset freezings originated by the tax authorities, as the interviewee in question, despite being a civil servant, had tax problems, long before the publication of the book and of the documentary. Currently this house is owned by Banco Espirito Santo, one of the creditors, with visible credit problems with the referred interviewee, long before the publication of the book, and, therefore, the actions brought by the respondents.

About the "Jaguar" vehicle with licence plate 28-FB-58, which at the date of the process was owned by the single-name society mentioned, was, on January 21, 2010 sold to a third party and on whose name is currently registered, so that neither the parents of Madeleine McCann nor any of the several other creditors had the possibility to use it to cover the various debts incurred by the referred, repeating, long before the book's publication.

As for the pension that the former inspector receives, in the amount of € 2,039.16, it’s being deducted from it a percentage of less than 0.1% of the known values received by the ex-inspector for the book and documentary, which he delivered finished to his publishers even before the criminal process, which was under judicial secrecy, had been archived, thus disrespecting the ex-inspector, in this as in other aspects, duties incumbent to him, even in the situation of retirement. Moreover, on this pension, there has previously been executed a seizure, originated in a process by the Finance Services of Olhao, for tax debts.

The parents of Madeleine McCann have no voice in Portugal. Everything was taken from them, the daughter, the honor and the possibility of a civic life, were annihilated as citizens, deprived of rights or social credit, which same did not happen, as can be seen in the interview with the gentleman who annihilated them.

For this reason, come Kate and Gerry McCann to claim that their response is published in its entirety, offering to pay what is considered as eventual excess text.

Isabel Costa Pereira
Mandated by Gerald and Kate McCann”

Moreover, on this pension, there has previously been executed a seizure, originated in a process by the Finance Services of Olhao, for tax debts.

Yes, I thought a chunk had been seized because Gonc hadn't paid his taxes.

Gonc has such a queue of Creditors that it's hard to see who will get what. And The Lovely Sofa is part of it all. She owes a few bob too, you know.

I have no idea how it works in Portugal - could Gonc have to carry the can for the whole lot? Don't know.

I really have to question his sanity - what on earth did he think he was doing, splattering the media with yet more lies and libel right before the libel trial?

Madness.

Sofia Leal is a Defendant along with Goncalo Amaral in the case brought by Amaral's Brother.
I have no idea how the poor man is ever going to get his money, but they both owe him on that one. And Sofia Leal would hardly have been made a Defendant if she wasn't going to be held responsible for her part, especially as she has benefitted from whatever proceeds. Let's face it, a Face Lift is hardly normal living expenses, so she might regret having that.

I suspect that nothing will be done until after The Libel Trial. And then whatever has been recovered from Gonc and Sofa will be apportioned in some way. but there ain't going to be a lot left.

Sabot, karma will strike again you know.

So, Sofia had a face lift...... well I hope she was told that within a few years her face will droop and she will age worse than if she had done nothing? That's one of the consequence of face lifts. You shouldn't start them unless you intend on having them at regular intervals. Sometimes 5 years!

Since I worked in probably the most 'beauty' conscious business on the planet, you get to see a lot...........

Comment on textusa:

Anonymous said...
The piece on behalf of the McCann's was also published in TV Mais, last week in February. I have a copy

How odd! Morais seems to have forgotten to share all this with her shrooms!