interview at SIC TV program " querida júlia / dear julie, where moita flores (fmf) and paulo sargento (ps) talks about Scotland Yard in the Madeleine McCann case

My friend, take a look at this,

http://videos.sapo.pt/sic/playview/225

interview at SIC TV program " querida júlia / dear julie, where moita flores (fmf) and paulo sargento (ps) talks about Scotland Yard in the Madeleine McCann case:


Francisco Moita Flores and Paul Sergeant.

Program Dear Julia, 29 August 2012; SIC.

Julia Pinheiro

FMF Francisco Moita Flores

PS Paul Sergeant

*******

FMF- this is very strange. Incidentally, I believe that this is more strange because in England every day, I will not say almost every day, but children often disappear. As in Portugal and also some disappear as seen not so much as those that disappear in England.

And this investigation is an investigation into a case investigated. What SY is doing, or what the British Police is doing is to investigate the process that the Portuguese Police investigated. It was not just the police who invested therein (the 3 million and such). Who invests there are always the same.


It is the government handing money to them to see all the solutions that exist for this case Maddie. Being sure that, for them, the solution is always the same. The Tiny was kidnapped and therefore we will see where the PJ failed for us to discover the kidnapper. No more chances.


And so what happens and I realize that the first public intervention inspectors made is that there is an exam, an exam written test and oral test to Case Investigated by the Portuguese Police. Whilst all the things that they brought were thousands of letters and clues, things like that. At the time that was two months ago but there were things that were all resolved by the Portuguese Police, which had them resolved.

What do I fear? But only if the Portuguese authorities are eyes closed, which is preparing another bleaching operation of this case. And, the bleaching operation results of this:

"The Girl in fact been kidnapped, so let´s see where pj failed, there's no chance of involving people known as the Tiny is" an infamous thing ", they are all good guys, so this was a Moroccan or a Portuguese ...... It has to be someone with complexion dark, which made the kidnapping.

And these gentlemen were all poor people in vacation, good people and bother them or throw questions is in fact an insult to many people. Good ..... it is perverse because it shows that people spend millions to whiten, images.


The process is closed. Only those who can open this process is the Portuguese prosecutor. So what they are doing is an investigation process that is closed. Are spending too much money and their fate is not yet there have the IMF.



PS: This is always an agenda. All these news, especially when coming from the British media, have an agenda. Here a month ago there was anything a call but this is a different call. What this man has to say because there is nothing going to close or not to close.

To no longer have sovereignty and fully endorse everything that Francisco said. And then what they did was a review of what the police had done. But none of that counts!

What counts is that we'll have in September 13th and 14th and on the 20th and 21 more of the final hearings of the trial of the main action of the McCanns against Gonçalo Amaral.

Maintain interest in the limelight because this is news without interest (the SY or borrow more money MET) revisit the 195 clues. It's pure stupidity. Is junk media but the case remains in the limelight in order to make a recovery after making a recovery in terms of image. And, they should realize that the Portuguese and the English have now also realize that there is more than that. Already SY now also appears to give an air of "authority" of respectability.

FMF: more respectable than the British government

PS: remember (turning to FMF) that David Cameron was taking cups and forgot daughter in PUB. This seems to be repetitive in English. And so there must be some insight here that this is just media strategy to return again to the fore in this English case, in light of the McCanns work a little bit the image.

FMF: there is a very critical mistake that could present SY and I always considered it a serious error in the process and I do not mind giving this contribution to SY, that is. why, why the Portuguese Judicial Police in the first time because it resolves the first time, parents protected and shielded her friends?

Why was that not the protection of addressing the situation before we were to live? I know colleagues (fellow journalist JP) have a vision beata (beatérica) "ai, parents, poor things; friends there, poor things, they are all good people and only drink glasses of red wine (wine) and had nothing to do with the child who was asleep at 200 meters, it is evil police.

This blessed and very moralistic vision has nothing to do with what is attack the problems of violence and homicides in which everyone is treated equally. And, the first suspect is what is closest. Victims, Children and Others, are produced by those who are closest. Not to say that it is the parents but are those who had access to the house.

After this problem also arose and wrong "was not bothering phone calls to dads?" ; Higher authorities who said there was "no messing these gentlemen?"; And the Portuguese Judicial Police that tells the truth
If telephoned the Embassies; telephoned directly to ....... (Noise); calls came from the British government? Responding to this! Because they know this answer! And, it's not worth being silent.

Then there is a question that is simpler than it is a technical gesture Police, which is the simplest of all: I challenge anyone here present, to go to a house with a semi closed blinds and leave with a child on her back.

PS passing over a bed

FMF: is a reconstruction, called this a rebuilding. Put up a child on his back and goes with her to the back over a window that is open. And, let's see if we can not all fall to the ground if all pass and goes one and not the other passes. Why not pass!

PS: There are two ways. Nobody will close the process that is filed. The process itself is closed. Again this is rubbish but media there would be two ways to reopen this case:

one is Attorney General look with eyes to see, and I apologize, but review was not in 21 days but it was impossible to review and ask about some great credibility, I know, to "ask new requests for tracks that were not investigated.

and the second was like this fly in honey is the girl's mother to answer questions not answered. If the girl's mother wants answer will help a lot of research and will not do what a Judicial Inspector told him "you do not know the answer to these questions will make confuse the investigation." And she said "yes, yes, if that's what the investigation thinks." She rethink this and so will know what happened.

Thanks, Pedro.

Do those two ever change the script? They've been saying the same things for five years now, and haven't moved on one inch.

You welcome bb1, about these two morons change their script, the answer is: no, because their filthy brains are so obsessed, that they cannot allow other views or comments.

these two morons are the kind of people who prefers instead of seeing missing children or people in portugal being found safe and sound (because these morons don´t like that, don´t want to see that happen) because eveytime a missing child is found, these two morons don´t make comments about, and júlia pinheiro is no different from these tow morons: I count the tv programms this júlia pinheiro was host when missing children are found safe and sound, whether UK, Portuguese or from any other country: the answer is: no tv program from her or with these two morons about children who were missing, have been found alive, safe and sound.

these tv programs are full of prejudice and arrogance, typical behaviour, this type of behaviour is an unacceptable rotten behavior. and then they don´t accept comments, opinions, credible evidence of other police, that is against what they think. for this kind of people this is their thought: I'm right, I give orders and I do not admit that anyone, whoever they are, contradict or disobey me, all this with an arrogance. this is how tv shows are impartial and doing a public service free of such situations where only defend what goes against their thinking that nothing dignifies the name of the TV channel and those that lend themselves to this type of arrogant and disgusting behavior. and then starts laughing, as if it were a laughing matter.

And why are they always on Dear Julia? They never seem to be on any other shows.

exactly bb1, your words are mine. because, it is julia who only invites these two fame-seekers to talk.

I've noticed that more and more, Pedro, no-one else seems to want them on their shows. Just her, all the time. And they all just keep saying the same things, over and over again.

Yes, you´re right bb1.

I see they are still on about someone climbing out of the window carrying Madeleine. Have they never heard of the Front Door? All of these Continental Locks can be opened from inside without a key, even the double locking ones, otherwise it would be a fire hazard. All they are doing is showing their ignorance. Or worse still, trying to influence Amaral's Trial.
Isabel Duarte isn't stupid. She will tear that one apart if they try it on.

But that's what I think it is about. Trying to sway Public Opinion. However, the eyes of The World are going to be on this Trial, so woe betide anyone who tries smart aleck tricks.

Isn't it absolutely pathetic? Same old script, same tired old Stooges churning out the same old rubbish.

Same old 48 Questions that no one in their right mind would have answered. All designed to implicate The McCanns, and nothing to do with finding Madeleine.
You get made an Arguido to protect yourself because The PJ suspect you. Why do they persist in demanding Kate answer them? She isn't going to. And nor would they have done in the same circumstances.
If you believe that lot they would all have been crawling around on their hands and knees searching, and then followed up by implicating themselves. And then they would have insisted that they fell down The Police Station Stairs.

Do you know, it still hasn't dawned on the haters - or the likes of Arguido Sargento and Moita the Mason - that if the UK police had had the slightest inkling that the McCanns had harmed their daughter when they did the earlier, 'scoping' exercise....

THE REVIEW WOULD NOT HAVE GONE AHEAD

The Gonc fans really ought to wake up; Portugal is dragging its heels because the Yard and the non-Gonc PJ KNOW Madeleine was abducted. The time is coming, though, when Portugal is going to throw Gonc to the wolves for the damage he has done them.

The Gonc cult don't even seem to know the way the wind is blowing in Portugal already; you would think even they would have realised how much he is disliked after he so spectacularly - and expensively - lost his case against Marcos and the Professor.

But no, they just carry on saying the same things, day in, day out, tick tocking and trying to reassure themselves that that Tide is finally turning.

Woeful.

Pathetic. How on earth are they going to Spin The Trial? I hope it is on Twitter. Twitter does have it's uses now and again.

Well, Flores the Masonic Mayor is a big fan of police brutality:


MF – Things were different in my time. She would have been under such an attack that before she realised anything, she'd be in jail.

Pig.

You might think that FIVE AND A HALF YEARS would give them some idea of what actually happened.

MADELEINE WAS ABDUCTED BY A STRANGER AND SPIRITED OUT OF PRAIA DA LUZ LONG BEFORE THE PJ GOT THEIR ACT TOGETHER.
The PJ then wasted nearly a year pursuing her parents.

bb1 wrote:Well, Flores the Masonic Mayor is a big fan of police brutality:


MF – Things were different in my time. She would have been under such an attack that before she realised anything, she'd be in jail.

Pig.

Yer, pity about that. But far too many people were paying too much attention to previous accusation of brutality by then. How dare they. How could Goncalo Amaral be expected to solve the case if he wasn't allowed to hit anyone?

If anyone still thinks Gonc's nasty little 'book' hasn't harmed Madeleine McCann, then the sight of those two yet again earning a few €€€€€€s pushing the Team Gonc line that her parents were involved in her death is all the proof needed.

I wonder how much the hangers-on have made over the years by insisting that Madeleine McCann is dead, despite there being not a scrap of evidence of any such thing?

bb1 wrote:If anyone still thinks Gonc's nasty little 'book' hasn't harmed Madeleine McCann, then the sight of those two yet again earning a few €€€€€€s pushing the Team Gonc line that her parents were involved in her death is all the proof needed.

I wonder how much the hangers-on have made over the years by insisting that Madeleine McCann is dead, despite there being not a scrap of evidence of any such thing?

And all over Portuguese National Television as well. That wasn't very bright, was it, just two weeks before the start of The Trial. But trying to influence Public Opinion is exactly what The Trial is about. So well done those two.

Seen smiffy's hilarious bleat about Gonc's finances?

Goncalo Amaral’s financial resources are much smaller than those of the McCanns, whose lifestyle, unlike Goncalo Amaral’s, has greatly ripened since the disappearance of their daughter – not many Leicester doctors without a private practice get to fly in private jets, do they? Everything has to be paid for in litigation – not just the attorney’s fees but everything, including the transcripts, the photocopies and the paperclips. So do the high costs of assembling research material that may help clarify matters to a court, such as the time-consuming trawl through the McCanns’ public statements to the UK audience which provides so many undeniable examples of their lies. So as a little gesture of solidarity the Bureau does that for free and makes sure that the evidence behind the opinions is made known to Goncalo's legal team. Every little helps.*(c) Tesco*

Well, maybe Gonc shouldn't have spent his ill-gotten gains on fireworks, earrings, hats and makeovers, then.

Oh, and he could also have tried paying the Portuguese taxman, then he wouldn't have had so much of his pension docked.

And let us not forget Gonc ripping off his own brother and having to be ordered to pay said brother damages by a Portuguese court.

And bringing a ridiculous criminal case against Marcos Correia and Professor Dore, and being ordered to pay all the court costs when it, predictably, failed.

Gonc could have tried working for a living, paying his taxes, and not ripping people off - his troubles are entirely of his own making.

Anyway, Gonc's doomed if smiffy is in charge of 'research' - he's as slipshod as Bennett.

Anyway, Gonc's doomed if smiffy is in charge of 'research' - he's as slipshod as Bennett

Keep up the good work, Smiffy.

Sauces say there is a very good reason why smiffy talks such incomprehensible, error-riddled nonsense.

He's Gonc's Dude.

Not that he's jealous or anything...

not many Leicester doctors without a private practice get to fly in private jets, do they

That was, what, once or twice, FIVE YEARS AGO.

Clearly still rankles with smiffy, though.

Since then, Gerry McCann has been working as an NHS doctor in the Midlands - really living the high life, that is

He's not been throwing money away like some ghetto fabulous rapper, on diamond earrings, parties and fireworks. No, it's Goncalol who behaved like a chav who'd won the lottery.

He must have been tired and emotional *cough* when he wrote this bollox:

Isabel Duarte may feel that the triple track evidence of prosecutors’ findings, Leicester police words and, last but not least, the McCanns’ myriad untruths since summer 2008, can somehow be countered in front of the libel court judges. Unfortunately for her it is irrefutable, which is why the parents won’t appear to refute it and why the numerous witnesses she has managed to assemble will steer well clear of the facts and will only testify to personal belief in the McCanns’ innocence

-------------

1. The prosecutor's report ended with:

Therefore, after all seen, analysed and duly pondered, with all that is left exposed, it is determined:

a) The archiving of the Process concerning arguido Robert James Queriol Eveleigh Murat, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code;

b) The archiving of the Process concerning Arguidos Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.

Is smiffy too far gone to grasp what:


Therefore, after all seen, analysed and duly pondered, with all that is left exposed, it is determined:

means?


2. WTF has a neutral statement by Leicestershire police BEFORE the McCanns and Murat were cleared got to do with the price of fish? Leicestershire police's website has been linked to the McCanns' site ever since.

3. Smiffy calling something 'myriad untruths' does not make it so.

I don't think he has the foggiest idea about the disaster looming for his beloved Gonc - have you ever seen such an exhibition of crawling?

If smiffy has anything at all to do with Gonc's defence - then Gonc would be well advised to settle now. In the unlikely event he has anything to settle with.

I wonder how much Smiffy is being paid to write that claptrap?