Similar topics
Search
Latest topics
Affiliates
BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
+4
Lamplighter
crazytony
lily
bb1
8 posters
Page 1 of 3
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3 
BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 6:58 pm
He's just posted this on Havern's; I will repeat the post in the members' area so we can discuss it -- properly 
SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Tony Bennett Today at 6:44 pm
This is to inform you all that at 3.35pm this afternoon I collected a large package from my nearest local Royal Mail Sorting Office which they had said on a delivery card was 'a white bag' and they had been unable to deliver whilst I was away on holiday and because it was 'too large for my letter box.
I was able to collect it this afternoon, not knowing what it was.
The lady at the sorting office (she's a Cockney) said as she lugged the package slowly towards me: "Blimey, it's a good job that didn't fall off on to me 'ed".
On reaching home later on I weighed it on my bathroo mscales and it was nearly a stone in weight.
On opening the package, there was a 56-page letter from Carrer-Ruck alleging basically that articles on the MF website, MR leaflets, and around four dozen items on this forum constituted a breach of ONE of the High Court undertakings given by me to the McCanns on 25 November 2009.
The specific undertaking they say I breached was "not to repeat allegations that the Claimants are guilty of, or are to be suspected of, causing the death of their daughter; and/or disposing of her body; and/or lying about what happeend and/or seeking to cover up what they had done".
I have been asked to remove a total of 22 articles from the MF website, and amend or cut two others.
So far as this forum is concerned, I have been asked to remove 42 of my postings, I give a full list of what the McCanns want removed below. I am urgently discussing with admin the removal of those posts from public view and so at any time these may disappear.
Incidentally the removal of all the posts and articles that the McCanns want removed will not necessarily stop the McCanns from bringing contempt of court proceedings, which would be brought before a High Court Judge. If found guilty of contempt, the three main remedies are: fine, seizure of assets, and imprisonment.
t may be noted that I have to date made 3,501 posts on here, and only 42 are deemed by the McCanns to be in contempt, that's less than 1.2%. The other 3,459 are presumably not regarded as being in contempt.
I have endeavoured since 25 November 2009 to stick closley to the facts and what may be deduced from, rather than finger-pointing and accusing - based on the legal advice I received at the time.
I can't publish the Carter-Ruck letter here (for technical reasons), but I can publish my reply to them, send just after 5pm today:
Dear Ms Hudson,
At 3.35pm this afternoon I took delivery of a package from yourself containing a 5-page letter explaining why your clients consider I have breached the undertaking given to them on 25 November 2009, plus two ring-binders containing a schedule of 54 articles, postings, threads or parts of threads which your clients require to be removed or amended.
The Post Office attempted to deliver the package whilst I was away on holiday. The package was not marked 'Special Delivery' nor 'Recorded Delivery', nor 'Urgent', nor 'First Class', despite being marked 'Most Urgent' on page 1 of your letter.
I have had barely one hour to consider the contents of your letter and enclosures but will say this at this stage:
1. In view of your clients requests, I will embark straightaway, without any admission of liability or concession as to being in contempt of court as you allege, on removing or amending the articles or threads to which your client objects. They will be accompanied by the following message, or similar:
Following receipt of a package by Tony Bennett from Carter-Ruck at 3.35pm on 17 August 2011, this article/post has been removed/amended pending the outcome of further correspondence with Carter-Ruck.
2. On a cursory examination of your client's demands, there is some material that might possibly be argued to come closer to being treated as contempt of court than others. I cannot be expected to comply with every single request they make, and here the Englishman's right of free speech and the Articles in the European Court of Human Rights guaranteeing freedom of speech and expression would have to be weighted very carefully by any Judge trying to decide whether I have been in contempt of the undertaking. I will need some time to consider your clients' demands one by oone and in some cases I may not be able to agree to remove the articles.
3. Furthermore, I undetake no later than 1pm tomorrow to send you a more considered and fuller response to your letter, by e-mail. I will add that I shall be away from home from 1pm tomorrow until Sunday and out of e-mail contact during that period. Because of the occasional unreliability of e-mail communications I must ask that any substantive letters from you be sent by hard copy please.
Sincerely,
Tony Bennett
----------------
List of post follows.
Frankly, after what Bennett did today, he needn't bother whinging about an 'Englishman's rights' or whatever. He is a cad, a bounder and a coward.
IMO.
Please discuss in members area, where I will repost this
SOME FORUM POSTS MAY BE REMOVED DUE TO A CARTER-RUCK LETTER
Tony Bennett Today at 6:44 pm
This is to inform you all that at 3.35pm this afternoon I collected a large package from my nearest local Royal Mail Sorting Office which they had said on a delivery card was 'a white bag' and they had been unable to deliver whilst I was away on holiday and because it was 'too large for my letter box.
I was able to collect it this afternoon, not knowing what it was.
The lady at the sorting office (she's a Cockney) said as she lugged the package slowly towards me: "Blimey, it's a good job that didn't fall off on to me 'ed".
On reaching home later on I weighed it on my bathroo mscales and it was nearly a stone in weight.
On opening the package, there was a 56-page letter from Carrer-Ruck alleging basically that articles on the MF website, MR leaflets, and around four dozen items on this forum constituted a breach of ONE of the High Court undertakings given by me to the McCanns on 25 November 2009.
The specific undertaking they say I breached was "not to repeat allegations that the Claimants are guilty of, or are to be suspected of, causing the death of their daughter; and/or disposing of her body; and/or lying about what happeend and/or seeking to cover up what they had done".
I have been asked to remove a total of 22 articles from the MF website, and amend or cut two others.
So far as this forum is concerned, I have been asked to remove 42 of my postings, I give a full list of what the McCanns want removed below. I am urgently discussing with admin the removal of those posts from public view and so at any time these may disappear.
Incidentally the removal of all the posts and articles that the McCanns want removed will not necessarily stop the McCanns from bringing contempt of court proceedings, which would be brought before a High Court Judge. If found guilty of contempt, the three main remedies are: fine, seizure of assets, and imprisonment.
t may be noted that I have to date made 3,501 posts on here, and only 42 are deemed by the McCanns to be in contempt, that's less than 1.2%. The other 3,459 are presumably not regarded as being in contempt.
I have endeavoured since 25 November 2009 to stick closley to the facts and what may be deduced from, rather than finger-pointing and accusing - based on the legal advice I received at the time.
I can't publish the Carter-Ruck letter here (for technical reasons), but I can publish my reply to them, send just after 5pm today:
Dear Ms Hudson,
At 3.35pm this afternoon I took delivery of a package from yourself containing a 5-page letter explaining why your clients consider I have breached the undertaking given to them on 25 November 2009, plus two ring-binders containing a schedule of 54 articles, postings, threads or parts of threads which your clients require to be removed or amended.
The Post Office attempted to deliver the package whilst I was away on holiday. The package was not marked 'Special Delivery' nor 'Recorded Delivery', nor 'Urgent', nor 'First Class', despite being marked 'Most Urgent' on page 1 of your letter.
I have had barely one hour to consider the contents of your letter and enclosures but will say this at this stage:
1. In view of your clients requests, I will embark straightaway, without any admission of liability or concession as to being in contempt of court as you allege, on removing or amending the articles or threads to which your client objects. They will be accompanied by the following message, or similar:
Following receipt of a package by Tony Bennett from Carter-Ruck at 3.35pm on 17 August 2011, this article/post has been removed/amended pending the outcome of further correspondence with Carter-Ruck.
2. On a cursory examination of your client's demands, there is some material that might possibly be argued to come closer to being treated as contempt of court than others. I cannot be expected to comply with every single request they make, and here the Englishman's right of free speech and the Articles in the European Court of Human Rights guaranteeing freedom of speech and expression would have to be weighted very carefully by any Judge trying to decide whether I have been in contempt of the undertaking. I will need some time to consider your clients' demands one by oone and in some cases I may not be able to agree to remove the articles.
3. Furthermore, I undetake no later than 1pm tomorrow to send you a more considered and fuller response to your letter, by e-mail. I will add that I shall be away from home from 1pm tomorrow until Sunday and out of e-mail contact during that period. Because of the occasional unreliability of e-mail communications I must ask that any substantive letters from you be sent by hard copy please.
Sincerely,
Tony Bennett
----------------
List of post follows.
Frankly, after what Bennett did today, he needn't bother whinging about an 'Englishman's rights' or whatever. He is a cad, a bounder and a coward.
IMO.
Please discuss in members area, where I will repost this
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
lily Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:06 pm
Well of course the post office didn't deliver it if it was too thick to go through his door. He informed CR that he would be away.
Will discuss further........
Will discuss further........
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:10 pm
Indeed, Lily, we will discuss --elsewhere.
And Bennett can STFU about his right to Free Speach.
He tried to deprive US of OUR right to free speech, so he can take a hike - it works both ways.
And Bennett can STFU about his right to Free Speach.
He tried to deprive US of OUR right to free speech, so he can take a hike - it works both ways.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
lily Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:13 pm
He's highly selective, as we well know, Bonny.
He's a really poor solicitor if he doesn't know the difference between free speech and defamation, isn't he?
Never mind, it's good that others like good solicitors, barristers and judges do.
He's a really poor solicitor if he doesn't know the difference between free speech and defamation, isn't he?
Never mind, it's good that others like good solicitors, barristers and judges do.
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
crazytony Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:13 pm
Boy, have they got their own back on him for the diatribes he sent to them.
56 pages.....beats Bennett's fifteen thousand word doc.
56 pages.....beats Bennett's fifteen thousand word doc.
crazytony- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:19 pm
Unbelivable; on another thread, he is trying to tell CR the law - and makes another filthy remark about the young girl he targetted this afternoon.
I'm not bothering with his stupid pretendy law; I can only conclude he is insane.
Oh well, I am sure he will be happy in Rampton.
I'm not bothering with his stupid pretendy law; I can only conclude he is insane.
Oh well, I am sure he will be happy in Rampton.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
lily Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:21 pm
Tony,
Ms Hudson. Many thanks for your stellar work on behalf of your wonderful clients.
Ms Hudson. Many thanks for your stellar work on behalf of your wonderful clients.
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:22 pm
Paras 3.7 to 3.9: Alternative Dispute Resolution
I am willing to consider mediation.
Is he now? There's nothing to mediate, and he has not only insulted the young girl, he has libelled Mr Smethurst all over again - and it is even worse this time.
I am willing to consider mediation.
Is he now? There's nothing to mediate, and he has not only insulted the young girl, he has libelled Mr Smethurst all over again - and it is even worse this time.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
lily Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:26 pm
bb1 wrote:Unbelivable; on another thread, he is trying to tell CR the law - and makes another filthy remark about the young girl he targetted this afternoon.
I'm not bothering with his stupid pretendy law; I can only conclude he is insane.
Oh well, I am sure he will be happy in Rampton.
It looks like Bennett is getting his chance to be in court after all. He can argue with the judge about the law.
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:28 pm
He seems unaware that Carter Ruck are perfectly aware of what happened earlier in August IN REAL TIME; they know he's lying.
Oh well, who cares? Not me
Oh well, who cares? Not me
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:29 pm
jd Today at 7:19 pm
One thing we can learn from this, is that we are obviously getting too close to the truth
One thing we can learn from this, is that we are obviously getting too close to the truth
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
Lamplighter Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:38 pm
DISPUTE? WHAT DISPUTE???? 
There is NO DISPUTE, just facts, plain as the nose on his face, facts. As for mediation - oh, purleeeeeeease!!!! He is, as they say, so far in the sh!t he's never gonna get out of it before he pops his clogs! LL
There is NO DISPUTE, just facts, plain as the nose on his face, facts. As for mediation - oh, purleeeeeeease!!!! He is, as they say, so far in the sh!t he's never gonna get out of it before he pops his clogs! LL 
Lamplighter- Slayer of scums
- Location : I am the Judge, Jury and Executioner
Join date : 2011-06-24
Age : 84
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
crazytony Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:39 pm
bb1 wrote: jd Today at 7:19 pm
One thing we can learn from this, is that we are obviously getting too close to the truth
Last edited by crazytony on Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:59 pm; edited 1 time in total
crazytony- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 7:53 pm
That's very clever, now the members are making sick remarks about Mr Smethurst's family...I suppose they do know that the ips of all these people Bennett alleged were involved in all this depravity will have been checked before this started?
No?
They might want to have a think about the implications of that...
No?
They might want to have a think about the implications of that...
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:00 pm
Bennett is quite clearly obsessing about a young girl; he is heading the right way for a jail sentence right now.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:05 pm
You know, if Bennett had spent less time perving about wierd sex, and more time looking at the names of one or two heavy metal bands, he might not, right this minute, be heading for the Mother Of All Lawsuits.
Not to mention making a TOTAL PILLOCK of himself.
Not to mention making a TOTAL PILLOCK of himself.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
lily Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:42 pm
Typical Bennett, doesn't check out the facts before engaging his twisted brain.
I wonder how he's going to get out of this one? Pretty bad all around don't you think?
I wonder how he's going to get out of this one? Pretty bad all around don't you think?
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:44 pm
He can't, Lily - he made foul, baseless accusations without even stopping to think. That will all be with Carter Ruck already.
He's ruined himself, and it is all his own fault, for having such a dirty mind.
He's ruined himself, and it is all his own fault, for having such a dirty mind.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:54 pm
Here's some Bestiality:
A bit raucous for me, much more to the taste of the young people Bennett has been perving about.
A bit raucous for me, much more to the taste of the young people Bennett has been perving about.
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 8:57 pm
Tony's found more Bestiality for Bennett:
http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=bd7d5ff2f7285e1a
http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=bd7d5ff2f7285e1a
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
crazytony Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:00 pm
And Bennett Calls Himself A Researcher?bb1 wrote:Tony's found more Bestiality for Bennett:
http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=bd7d5ff2f7285e1a
All He Had To Do Was Read It Properly. He Would Have Realized He Had Flucked Up.
So Sad, Too Bad!!!!
crazytony- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:06 pm
Not really my kind of music, Tony, I prefer something tasteful like Alice...
It is entirely Bennett's own fault for having such a dirty mind
It is entirely Bennett's own fault for having such a dirty mind
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
lily Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:10 pm
What a hopeless researcher he is too.
He gets something as basic as kids' music wrong, how can anything else he spouts be correct? Think about it.
He gets something as basic as kids' music wrong, how can anything else he spouts be correct? Think about it.
lily- Slayer of scums
- Join date : 2011-06-24
Re: BENNETT WALLOPED BY CARTER RUCK
bb1 Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:11 pm
Bleat on hellhole:
Surely there must be something that can be done to stop such outrageous attempts to gag things that no reasonable person could consider as defamatory.
Actually, wrongly accusing innocent people of associating with paedophiles, and of enjoying having sex with animals, is generally considered pretty bad....
Surely there must be something that can be done to stop such outrageous attempts to gag things that no reasonable person could consider as defamatory.
Actually, wrongly accusing innocent people of associating with paedophiles, and of enjoying having sex with animals, is generally considered pretty bad....
bb1- Slayer of scums
- Location : watcher on the wall
Join date : 2011-06-24
Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
Similar topics» bennett rebuttal to Carter Ruck
» CARTER RUCK RECEIVE E-MAIL OFF BENNETT
» CARTER RUCK'S 'CONTEMPT OF COURT' LETTER TO BENNETT IN AUGUST
» CARTER RUCK RECEIVE E-MAIL OFF BENNETT
» CARTER RUCK'S 'CONTEMPT OF COURT' LETTER TO BENNETT IN AUGUST
Page 1 of 3
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
» help Liam Scott
» WE STILL HOPE' Madeleine McCann parents vow to keep searching for their daughter in emotional Christmas message
» Candles site
» Madeleine McCann's parents urge holidaymakers to take posters abroad with them this summer in bid to find their daughter
» Madeleine McCann investigation gets more funding
» new suspect in Madeleine McCann
» NETFLIX DOCUMENTARY
» SUN, STAR: 'Cristovao goes on trial' - organised home invasions, etc