New E-fits released

Deborah J Armstrong ‏@DebbieJayne1976
Everyone who I've spoken so to far have all said the same thing, that photo fit resembles Gerry #McCann himself.


Can only have spoken to forkers wearing hategoggles then, as it bears little resemblance to Gerry beyond being male.

There is, however, someone else it is the spitting image of. And I suspect Mr Smith knew it.

http://madeleinemccannthetruth.wordpress.com/2013/10/14/crimewatch-bbc-in-pdl-jim-gamble-interview-0810-oct-14th/

Interesting video from this morning.

And still the McCann-haters speculate without having the complete picture, thus setting themselves up for the inevitable Tears Before Bedtime.

Hope they've got plenty Kleenex handy.  

Sky are doing a follow-up tomorrow:



Maybe the McCann-haters will have dried their tears by then?

Tigerloaf is doing a sterling job on news reports:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post196178.html#p196178

latest:



The McCann-haters currently speculating are yet again ignoring the blindingly obvious - that Jane Tanner will, in fact, be greatly relieved that whoever she saw that night was NOT someone abducting her friend's child.

The forkers really should wait until the broadcast before jumping to conclusions.

Redwood has told Sky they are looking for that man who was seen carrying a blonde haired child wearing pyjamas towards the beach. More will be released tonight.

bb1 wrote:http://madeleinemccannthetruth.wordpress.com/2013/10/14/crimewatch-bbc-in-pdl-jim-gamble-interview-0810-oct-14th/

Interesting video from this morning.

Excellent. Thanks to Bren for recording that.

Classic example of haters adding 2+2 and getting 1,345:

Madeleine McCann: Key Details 'Were Wrong'
Post  almostgothic Today

If she hasn't done so already, I suggest that Tanner flip-flops down the cop shop toot sweet with whatever mitigating circumstances she can muster.
Because otherwise the legal consequences for her and her family could be very serious indeed.

What consequences? For reporting what she saw? Don't be so stupid - the onus was on the PJ to sort it out, not to use whoever Ms Tanner saw as yet another stick to beat the McCanns with.

I should think it's an enormous load off her mind, should it be demonstrated tonight that whoever she saw was NOT in the process of abducting her friend's child.

Wouldn't they be better wondering why the Smiths took so long to go to the police? Mr Smith need to get something straight, did he?

Nice to see the inJustice forum adding to the hysteria by speculating about a programme that hasn't even aired yet.  

Why not just wait till Crimewatch has been broadcast, when all will doubtless become clear, and this frenzied speculation shown up as the nonsense it is?

Go and do something else, watch a nice film, read a book, stop staring at Sky News trying to glean Clues.  

You know they will still be speculating when doing other things.    

deborah butler ‏@IWILLNOTGOAWAY 2h
@JasonFarrellSky it's not new it's from smith sighting in http://mccannfiles.com #McCann Fgs

Jason Farrell ‏@JasonFarrellSky 2h
@IWILLNOTGOAWAY what's new is the significance given to it.

deborah butler ‏@IWILLNOTGOAWAY 2h
@JasonFarrellSky you could crack this with some good honest investigative uncontrolled reporting #McCann

Jason Farrell ‏@JasonFarrellSky 2h
@IWILLNOTGOAWAY I interviewed smith in 2008 so I know what he said. I can't really comment until crimewatch goes out, due to the embargo.

Not Tango's day, is it? She keeps getting told to Go forth and multiply.

Now, why don't they all just calm down and wait till it airs? All will be revealed then, as yet again, hater fantasies crumble into dust.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=2639.30

How crucial was the Smith delay?

Very good question - and why the delay, anyway? One or two of us here have an inkling, but we're not going to speculate any further.

OMG, that loonytunes jeanmonro forker thinks the police will be using a

thermal imaging facial lie detector camera

 

rofl:              

As an aside, the studio lights aren't very hot are they?

No, it's well known-that studio lights never, ever throw out any heat.  

That is one less hope she has to worry about now.  

For a supposed former police officer of rank, pretendypete doesn't have talk some p*sh to impress the hounders. Still odd him not knowing about custody laws, etc.  

Indeed, Bonny and as for this part:

During the programme transmitted on 14 October, a purported reconstruction of events was shown. Computerised e-fit pictures were shown of a number of ‘persons of interest’, described as people ‘who could be of vital importance’ to the Scotland Yard enquiry. Yet DCI Redwood also conceded that he was ‘not sure if they were the key to unlocking this mystery’. A US former prosecutor and now child advocate, Wendy Murphy, openly told millions watching Fox News on 10 October that in her professional opinion, Scotland Yard were involved in promoting ‘a fake suspect’. Indeed, she ridiculed both Scotland Yard and the BBC for proceeding with this Crimewatch project which she said was all about ‘a non-existent suspect’.

Is he really going to libel Scotland Yard, the BBC and Crimewatch in that way?  

Nah, she's too stupid to bother about, she can chunter away to her heart's content. She'll find another high-profile case to get arse about face before too long, anyway - it seems to be her speciality.

ETA, oh, sorry, you meant pretendycop? His balloon is going to be well and truly burst in a couple of hours, which no doubt will set off fresh whining and bleating.

Yes, I meant him, Bonny. He would be repeating a libel which is a new libel in itself.

Even if they let it go, they could probably dig deep into his files for more information about him.  

Rosalinda V. Hutton ‏@RosalindaHu 3h
SY must have known the wags on twitter would have a field day with those photofits. Quite bizarre.

And in what alternate universe would the Yard give a flying one about a shower of pitchforking twittertw@ts?