'You are Vexatious'

Oh, FFS!

No wonder Bennett's legal career crashed and burned:

Re: Roderick MacDonald, newest suspect in the McCann case (Daily Mail 15/10/14)
Post Tony Bennett Today at 9:47 am

Also, is the slogan on his T-shirt

H A G L A N D

...the money-laundering expert appointed by Brian Kennedy in September 2007 to head up his Knutsford-based private investigations into Madeleine McCann's disappearance?



And why on earth would the old perv have the name of a complete stranger on his T Shirt, when he'd been spending so much time perving in THAILAND?

And speaking of pervs, from what's in the Mail, and on Anna Raccoon's blog, the one-handed typists are going to have to find something else to speculate about before much longer...

How long have we been saying his research and er....facts are codswallop?  He can't get anything right.  Sane people would have given up by now.  

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6024&sid=c465602e773210eb96facebfd8dbe62f&start=125

Mr BITTER from HARLOW.
Postby tigerloaf » Sun Oct 19, 2014 2:08 pm

Well said!

Impressive post tigerloaf!  Too bad the failed ex-solicitor does not heed those words, if only some to start with.

Just read Mr. Bennett's Happy Birthday Post to Edward Smethurst. That is one Sick, Putrid Fecker. I most definitely feel ill.

Mr. Bennett is depraved, and likely beyond redemption.

He sure is depraved at the very least, Sabot.  He needs help.

Guess who's got yet another communication stating:


In accordance with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, (the Act), this response

represents a Refusal Notice under Section 17(1) of the Act.

666 Harlow sez:


In the menatime, [sic] I will shortly be asking for a review of this comprehensive failure to supply ANY information in response to 12 perfectly reasonable questions.

'Perfectly reasonable'? He must have felt the need to demonstrate, yet again, why his legal career crashed and burned. Sample of 'reasonable questions':


7. On what date was it decided that (quote Matt Baggott) ‘every individual working in Leicestershire supporting the police investigation’ must sign a confidentialty agreement?

8. Please supply in physical or electronic form a copy of the confidentiality agreement.

9. How many staff in total signed the confidentiality agreement?

He doesn't even know what the word

CONFIDENTIALITY

means. Here's a Big Clue - it means it's no business of sticky-beaking hounders and harrassers that are incapable of minding their own business, but imagine they are entitled to shove their noses into ongoing police investigations.

When they aren't scheming to disrupt inquests with never-ending attention-seeking antics.

In the menatime, [sic] I will shortly be asking for a review of this comprehensive failure to supply ANY information in response to 12 perfectly reasonable questions.

Oh my - confidential!  Doesn't he want to sound important and knowledgable regarding anything and everything?  

You can just imagine the comments from the person receiving that as it spreads around the workplace.

His name will be on a list, you know the nuisance kind.  They must howl at him just like C-R probably do.  

He has succeeded at something else....complete laughing stock.  

And he says he was a Solicitor.
Has he not grasped the theory that Police will not comment on a live investigation nor one which is confidential

As he appears to be too dumb to grasp why this is NOT reasonable:


8. Please supply in physical or electronic form a copy of the confidentiality agreement.

it is actually hard to believe he has ever been near a law book.

Would he like a signature on it, do you think? And what's he going to do with it, print it of and distribute to all and sundry? Forge signatures even?

He clearly imagines he is entitled to copies of CONFIDENTIAL documents, which he can then post on the internet.

Who were the people who are supposed to have signed it?

According to Bennett's list of entitlements and demands:


7. On what date was it decided that (quote Matt Baggott) ‘every individual working in Leicestershire supporting the police investigation’ must sign a confidentialty[sic] agreement?

As Bennett doesn't seem to know what the word means - from Wiki:

Confidentiality is a set of rules or a promise that limits access or places restrictions on certain types of information.

Good question from a dissenter on the hounder site:

As an aside can I ask whether Brenda Leyland's son gave permission for his picture to be used on the forum? Was he consulted?

Of course he wasn't, don't be silly! They're the Hounders, they're entitled to do as they please - or so they imagine.

I will now remind everyone of how good Bennett's sense of honor is.

Remember the Undertakings he signed and gave to Her Majesty's Court?  

So, pretendypete is continuing to demonstrate why so many people suspect the nearest he got to officer status was cleaning the sargeant's desk, going on about:

the impact of photos - curtains trapped behind bed,

He obviously HASN'T bothered to look at the PJ crime scene photos or he would have seen what is glaringly obvious to everyone else:



That bed is 10''-12'' at least AWAY from the window - hasn't he noticed the corner where the two walls meet? Good job the REAL police are a bit more attentive than the Troof Seekers and are fully aware that the curtains were anything but 'trapped'.

The Troofseekers might also like to note that the shutters are NOT fully closed in the crime scene photos.

Typical of their wonderful attention to detail.  

Pretty dumb not to notice that the bed is a good foot away from the window, and build all their pathetic Theories on that basic error......

bb1 wrote:Pretty dumb not to notice that the  bed is a good foot away from the window, and build all their pathetic Theories on that basic error......

....and keep going with even more errors after that.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6024&sid=93709f02360ba729494fa0d7af883369&start=150

Re: Mr BITTER from HARLOW.
Postby tigerloaf » Thu Oct 23, 2014 8:47 am

Tony Bennett is a snivelling, little, two-faced coward.

More, much more later.

Can't wait.

PS - Bennett's also a serial oath-breaker; he's gone back on his word more often than any politician.

Oh, just look at this utter sh*te from the hounders, who are occupying themselves inventing garbage about Beltane, etc:

Back to top Go down
Re: Ritualistic ?
Post  Latetothecase Yesterday at 11:28 pm

The documents Justine directed the PJ to find under the sofa, map covered with occult symbols?

Clearly, a job for Big Letters for Stupid People:

THERE WERE NO 'DOCUMENTS UNDER THE SOFA'

~with or without 'occult symbols'.

Duarte Levy, Morais' ex-squeeze, invented the whole thing for $$$$$$, as he invented so much else.

Another classic example of how LITTLE the hounder 'researchers' actually know about the case.

bb1 wrote:Oh, just look at this utter sh*te from the hounders, who are occupying themselves inventing garbage about Beltane, etc:

Back to top Go down
Re: Ritualistic ?
Post  Latetothecase Yesterday at 11:28 pm

The documents Justine directed the PJ to find under the sofa, map covered with occult symbols?

Clearly, a job for Big Letters for Stupid People:

THERE WERE NO 'DOCUMENTS UNDER THE SOFA'

~with or without 'occult symbols'.

Duarte Levy, Morais' ex-squeeze, invented the whole thing for $$$$$$, as he invented so much else.

Another classic example of how LITTLE the hounder 'researchers' actually know about the case.

Ah. But! Have you got PROOF that there were no documents under the sofa.