'TWO YEARS JAIL FOR VILE TROLLS'

They simply have NO idea what they are talking about, Sabot. As is pointed out on Myths:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=7098&sid=ed2a91a2233faf13969e8cbfe87c2de3&start=650


I am constantly laughing at the warped view of reality (that's a polite way of saying "pig ignorance") that they demonstrate. The bloody nonsense that they have been spouting about IPs is hilarious. Their ignorance of the fact that every time they look at a page on a forum their IP is openly visible and there is no need for any "illegal activity" to collect such IPs.

And some of them use free proxies believing that these hide their IPs. They just don't have a clue.


Proxies actually do the very opposite of hiding them. Any admin that sees a lurker in their stats with an apparent ip that shows as hidemyass of Ulan Bator knows its up to no good, and looks closer. They are actually painting a target on themselves.

It's much simpler just to never take your ip anywhere it shouldn't be.

Incidentally, I wonder how many of the hater bleats about being 'hacked' are actually down to their use of dodgy proxies?

Re: Let's Not Forget Brenda
Post jeanmonroe Today

However, on further reading, it is apparent that any such new laws are in fact "to be made as an amendment to the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill going through Parliament, and due to be debated in the House of Lords in the coming week" and that "The Bill applies to England and Wales ONLY"
----------------------------------------

So,

presumeably then, a 'troll' can 'carry on trolling, to their hearts content' IF they are 'trolling' FROM N Ireland and Scotland?

thinking

A CRIMINAL 'law' that is only 'enforced/enforcable' in HALF of the UK?

How very 'odd'!


Someone should tell that hysteria-prone moron that Scotland has had its own legal system and laws for centuries, before it invents any more conspiracy theories.

Oh, and PS - Scotland takes anti-social behaviour far more seriously than England and Wales. Bennett would almost certainly have been jailed long ago for his harrassment, under Scots law. Just ask his former chum Robert Green about that one.

Babalou ‏@B_balou 35m35 minutes ago
@TrutherDolly I meant are they surprised that people are using proxies when admit to keeping logs of IPs & compiling dossiers?

God, they're thick. Don't they realise those 'logs' are built into forums for security? They can go and ask Admin of MM, Haverns, anyone - it comes with the site. They really are stupid, and have NO idea how the grown-up world operates.

I don't think they can afford to let it sink in. You can even tell if more than one person is posting on the same Log In. And I don't mean from two computers either.

One bunch of idiots that I came across were posting on the same day from hundreds of miles apart, and then back again.

There are a wonderful couple of posts by tigerloaf here

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1020-tigerloaf-of-myths-on-the-twits-of-babblingboo

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6589&sid=295326400a49f330d35a7f9ad51d7104&start=275

Top
Re: They LIE when they say they are not haters!
Postby tigerloaf » Thu Oct 30, 2014 2:43 pm

The haters all seem to have gone stark, staring mad.

Contronumties boast about trolling Madeleine's FB page:

Pete A Nicholas Thanks for the link Margaret, but I cant post unless I join the poxy group.
1 hr · Like

Anthony Moriarty I joined it, posted a couple of simple questions about all the money & was hoofed out the door pronto! (truth hurts

Margaret Brady I've joined but can't post
47 mins · Like · 1

Margaret Brady Just as well cos I'd be letting rip and they wouldn't be best pleased

And then they wonder why they are despised, and called HATERS. Nothing says HATER better than trolling a support site for a missing child.

Just when you think the hounders can't get any dumber, they join in the swan-stalking and manage it.

Just a reminder for the haters that are still trying to rewrite history - it was LEYLAND who instigated direct contact with BRUNT, not the other way round:

516694464455528448|Mon Sep 29 21:02:14 +0000 2014|#mccann Just noticed @skymartinbrunt is following me, why Martin won't you investigate some of these facts and show neutrality ?


516694945034698752|Mon Sep 29 21:04:09 +0000 2014|@siamesey Mod is a total Fucktard, I despise him

516696005669289984|Mon Sep 29 21:08:22 +0000 2014|#mccann @skymartinbrunt Martin, any thoughts on the connection between *** ******, the witness and Basil ? how does that work ?


It really would be a good idea for them to STFU till the inquest. Unless they want to look even stupider than they do already when it turns out that they were then in communication by DM, and Leyland was semi-expecting Brunt? And that Brunt did everything by the book?

They might also like to consider this - Leyland was supposedly off out somewhere with a friend, but that clip was first shown early in the morning. Are they absolutely SURE it wasn't filmed a day or two before, and Leyland closed her twitter account because she thought she was going to be a telly star?

*******malicious falsehood redacted*******

516339051591643137|Sun Sep 28 21:29:57 +0000 2014|@RothleyPillow @PORTUGALONLINE #mccann I sometimes send their most outrageous ones direct to CM & Brunt

So, she had already been pestering both Brunt AND Clarence Mitchell? As well as Grange and the Portuguese tabloids, and was part of the group that organised the fake bad reviews of the S&S book.

The haters really should wait for the coroner's court - though I doubt if they are going to like much of what they will hear.

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 1 hr1 hour ago
@martin_liz @B_balou jayelles will probably be one to serve jail sentence, her powerful pals will abandon her and point finger. #mccann

Is Mutton suffering from weed-induced hallucinations and delusions?

Incidentally, when the hounders decide they are entitled to stick total strangers on their ghastly banners, they might at least have the decency to get the ages of said total strangers correct.

What with them being such fantastic armchair defectives and researchers, one would have thought they could tell a 30 year old bloke from a 20 year old by now, but seemingly not.

Even detecting legend dirtymac doesn't appear to have noticed.....

Strange that, isn't it?  He actually does look older than 20.  

When have the details stopped them from their obsessive agenda?

What is this they are trying to do with Phillomena McCann and some pond in Edinburgh ?

Besides talk sh*te and perv over women's ankles? I have absolutely NO idea, Sabot.

God knows what they think they're going to achieve, beyond make laughing stocks of themselves as usual. It's all completely irrelevant, anyway, just part of their campaign to rewrite history.

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1022-sykes-take-on-paranoia-and-what-fuels-it

SYKES' TAKE ON - PARANOIA AND WHAT FUELS IT

Excellent!

One wonders if the McCann-hating Amaral worshippers have the slightest idea of the sh*t-storm that is heading their way, courtesy of the UK media, once the inquest into Ms Leyland's death is out of the way?

The haters have spend years abusing and insulting anyone in the media that hasn't fallen in line with their sicko vendetta. Do they seriously imagine the tabloids won't take advantage of a golden opportunity to return the favour tenfold?

One shudders to think what the police have found on the deceased's computer/s; every obsessive rant, every contact with one of the other haters, is liable to be exposed in court.

Should be good!

Indeed it will. 

Hounder:

IF civil proceedings are brought after the inquest, I wonder who could be sued?

Why, the people that filled Leyland's head with nasty rubbish, of course, and egged her on continually to ever-worsening, obsessive, anti-social behaviour.

Hounder showing usual ignorance of the law.  

The hounders are in full screech over the suggestion that Jim Gamble is the perfect person to lead the government inquiry into historic child abuse. And coming out with gems of stupidity like:

Woofer wrote:
Remember David Blunkett is blind. Does this limit what he can read?

No, his guide dog reads it all to him - and dogs don't lie!

Jesus H. Christ, how STUPID are these people?

Incidentally, how on earth can the hounders describe the deceased Ms Leyland as a beloved and devoted mother?


She was estranged from one of her sons. The other one, the 30-year old (NOT 20) lived on the other side of the world.

They really are in for a reality check at the inquest.

Re: Read the files...

Post Hobs Today at 3:09 am
I had a fun convo on the bus coming back from kettering yesterday with a supoporter of their's (the bus was all ears) I was talking to mom about jodie arias and oscar pistorius and i mentioned the mccanns in passing.
The oldish dear sat in front of mom said oh but Maddie is alive blah blah blah. I went yay a bite (heheh i like to poke them with pointy sticks)
I said nope she is dead and explained why i knew she was dead which is the forensics plus kate and gerry have told us she is.
The old dear said she had a dream is there a place called melton park in melbourne OZ, I said i didn't know off the top of my head but i have a friend who lives there, why?
She said she was there once and saw a man that looked exactly like the one they described (i replied which one there are about 20?)
She said the first one.
I said tannerman? she said yes and he was with a tall guy, they were both dark haired and olive skinned and they were with a little girl who looked just like Maddie.
I was very good i didn't snort or snicker)
I said well dark people do have blonde kids, look at Malta etc.
I then explained why Maddie was dead and said ok you tell me why you think she is alive?
She said the parents were doctors, they would have sought help if she had an accident, I said clearly they didn't so why not?
She blathered on about her being alive and forced to wear glasses and this was a vision and she just knew etc.

I went through all the reasons why she wasn't, the whole downstairs getting a crash course in statement analysis 101 along the way.

She was adamant she was right and the parents were innocent.

I left her with "honey go google the mccannn files, read everything and once you have, get back to me and we will talk.

I bet more than a few passengers will now be looking at the files

__________________

OK - which one of you lot was winding "Hobs" up then?

You can just imagine the rant, the other passengers regretting not picking up a free newspaper, nodding nervously. Flecks of spittle flying as she got into her stride. How many got off the bus before their intended destination.......

Frankly, I don't believe a word of it - just another of her inventions. Most people would move as far away as possible from some fat nutjob that started ranting about the McCanns on public transport.

I went through all the reasons why she wasn't, the whole downstairs getting a crash course in statement analysis 101 along the way.



The nutter on the bus is a well-known hazard of public transport; one J. Carrott spoke about them at great length.