Sky - searching for Madeleine

https://stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=115&p=329840&sid=daa6df4cee2c37c1795b7e571d91c142#p329840


I always thought that was so dodgy, dog filmed constantly, dog plays with toy with indicating, dog ignored toy running past it on floor, dog runs round near cupboard, dog indicates at a foot or so past cupboard barking facing the rest of room, dog and cameraman leave room, camera man comes back in, someone goes to the part of the cupboard furthest from where dog indicates and where dog had in fact run past ignoring it, person then opens this part of cupboard and pulls out the toy with a deadly serious face and then reports dog indicates to the toy.

The haters always ignore that, even though senior PJ officers wondered what on earth Eddie was doing in that segment, filmed in the property the McCanns rented.

Hilariously, this dumbo hounder didn't even know where it was filmed and thought it was 'faked':

At 14:24 we see the first set of patio doors and at 14:38 we see a second set in the same room where the action is taking part.
The narration tries to give the impression that its the original same room 5a shown in the first scene.
THE MCCANNS APARTMENT 5a ONLY HAD ONE SET OF PATIO DOORS ?
Also we see in the footage of the fake room that it has very dark floor tiles with no pattern only a granite mottle effect, the sofa is striped and has wooden arm rests and the curtains are white with coloured squares THIS SCENE IS FABRICATED.
This second dog scene is shot in a modern format and very carefully edited to show only certain details.
We may also assume that the dog and dog handler are also fabricated.


I HAVE BEEN INVOLVED IN PROFESSIONAL EDITING AND SUGGEST THAT THIS FOOTAGE HAS BEEN SHOT,EDITED AND NARRATED IN SUCH A WAY AS TO DECEIVE AND TO DISCREDIT THE DOG EVIDENCE.
SO THE QUESTION IS WHO INSTIGATED THIS AND WHY.

It's a different property, you half-wit. Though it does rather demonstrate how little haters actually know about the case, and that they haven't read the police files.

What senior PJ officers said about Eddie playing with Cuddlecat:


http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/OUSTROS_APENSOS_11_VOLUMES.htm

If the dog is trained to react when he detects what he is looking for, why, in most of the cases, we see the dog passing more than once by that place in an uninterested way, until he finally signals the place where he had already passed several times'

On one of the films, it's possible to see that 'Eddie' sniffs Madeleine's cuddle cat, more than once, bites it, throws it into the air and only after the toy is hidden does he 'mark' it (page 2099). Whys didn't he signal it when he sniffs it on the first time'

http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/latest-news/611674/madeleine-mccann-tour-praia-da-luz-maddie-portugal-missing

ShininginLuz stars in the Star.

Thank you Bonny.  I will pass......

Lord Spencer‏ @lordspencer 12h12 hours ago
More
wow, a reply, thankyou sir - there are still many q for you on CMOMM forum (Jill Haverns one) / interesting - and thx

Colin Sutton‏
@colinsutton

Follow
More
Replying to @lordspencer
Many as no doubt - but last time I looked a good deal of abuse too. Sorry but I only do reasonable discussion with reasonable people.

And that's the Hounders telt!

My friends, this was taken from The Portugal News newspaper:

http://www.theportugalnews.com/news/madeleine-mccann-went-missing-ten-years-ago/41830

https://stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&p=330171#p330171

Quote:

Colin Sutton has gotten himself into a right mess. That blog post he made last night is just an attempt to distance himself from all of his comments over the past week or so. He is even retracting his comments on Sky when he said he felt he was being told he wouldn't be able to investigate the Mccanns. Now he is saying that the 'senior officer' didn't actually say that and that he didn't ask if this is what he meant.

The guy has opened his big gob, said some pretty sensational stuff that he now admits he has absolutely zero basis for saying so and he is backpeddling faster than McFadden can retweet an anti Mccann troll comment.

He didn't object to the false claims that he 'refused' to head up OG until it was pointed out that he had retired long before it even started.
He also doesn't correct claims that he worked on the Milly Dowler case. Yes he was in charge of the team that caught Levi Bellfield, who later confessed to Milly Dowler, but he was caught on an unrelated case that Sutton headed up.

His big post is essentially saying that he knows nothing, that his senior officer tipster told him nothing other than that he would encounter obstacles (and he didn't ask what they were), that he has no opinion about the Mccanns case, that he isn't even terribly familiar with the Mccann case and that he was never at any time involved in Operation Grange or in discussions about it. So why the hell is he touting himself as a spokesman on the subject?

Every time this man opens his mouth, he later revises what he meant or claims he is misinterpreted/misquoted. He is all over the fecking place and the only people he has impressed are the scum of social media, people who make fun of victims anonymously, people with mental issues and zero levels of human compassion. He has joined a very dark group online and his fellow group members include the likes of Marco Pierre White, Jodie Marsh, some bondage madam, the Yorkshire Ripper, Katie Hopkins, Jodie Marsh, a whole bunch of anarchists, Richard Hall, Tony Bennett, Isabelle Mcfadden (mentioned in two books about social media trolls), Ros Hutton...

The names themselves should be telling anyone with an ounce of intelligence what is going on here.


Well said. Mr Sutton was, IMO, an utter fool to go trotting off to the Hounders, of all people, looking for sympathy - or something.

Didn't he bother reading the conspiraloon rubbish that makes up so much of the nonsensical clutter on that site? He can't have been much of a detective if he failed to notice the revolting speculation they enjoy so much - or the socks.

https://stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&p=330425#p330425

BLOG POST REGARDING Mr.Sutton.

Well worth reading.