amaral and the media

I don't know who that is, Pedro, but I suggest it's way past time they stopped defending Gonc.

Which reminded me of something else I saw in his Book of Pies.

In chapter five, Gonc is whinging because there was a mistaken sighting in North Africa, in September:

Leaping forward in time and in the chronology of the investigation, we come to the end of September, a few days after the McCanns' return to Great Britain. Repeated statements from clan McCann, who are not budging from the Moroccan trail - will we ever know why? - encourage a young Spanish woman to examine more closely photos she had taken during her holiday in Morocco. Before leaving, she had not been aware, she said, of this Moroccan lead. In one of her photos, taken from a vehicle, a North African family is seen, walking along a road. A woman is carrying a little girl on her back: it can only be Madeleine. Someone tells me about this witness statement and wants to know what I think. I have obviously still not seen the photo and even so I respond, convinced: "Unfortunately, it's got to be a mistake."

Just look at that - all his prejudices laid bare. And look at the scathing reference to 'clan McCann' - straight from the Pitchforkers' Handbook.

But more importantly, the last sentence.

Why, pray tell, does it have to be a mistake? It did indeed turn out to be a well-intentioned mistake, as recently happened in India.

BUT WHY DID GONC INSIST IT WAS A MISTAKE WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE ACTUAL SITUATION?

The UK police did not instantly write it off:


We ask the chief of Leicestershire police, Stuart Prior, where he is up to with it. He explains that the English police, after having seen the photo, immediately submitted it to the McCanns, asking them if they recognised their daughter. To which they replied with a, "perhaps." Incomprehensible to say the least. We are shocked by the behaviour of the English, who took that initiative, without consulting us, us, the people responsible for the investigation, which is all the more ludicrous given that the McCanns were already considered as suspects. That way of doing things disrupts the strategy adopted for the investigation, which the Portuguese and English police agreed on

Disgusting; Gonc could not even be bothered to check it out; the UK police did. Gonc had already written Madeleine off - the UK police hadn't, and still haven't to this day.

And he has the nerve to describe the UK police speaking to the McCanns about the photo as 'incomprehensible'?

To describe it as 'ludicrous'?

Why? What is 'ludicrous' about a responsible police force letting the parents of a missing child know that a child has been seen which could, just possibly, be their daughter?

Was Gonc scared his 'thesis' was about to be wrecked by Madeleine being found? Because it sure sounds like it.

I agree with you bb1.

About:

!BUT WHY DID GONC INSIST IT WAS A MISTAKE WITH NO KNOWLEDGE OF THE ACTUAL SITUATION?"

the answer is simple: because for amaral his lies, smears, defamation written in his disgusting book of lies are what really matters for him, also to act as a celebrity, which he is not, except of course in his sick brain

About:

"The UK police did not instantly write it off:

We ask the chief of Leicestershire police, Stuart Prior, where he is up to with it. He explains that the English police, after having seen the photo, immediately submitted it to the McCanns, asking them if they recognised their daughter. To which they replied with a, "perhaps." Incomprehensible to say the least. We are shocked by the behaviour of the English, who took that initiative, without consulting us, us, the people responsible for the investigation, which is all the more ludicrous given that the McCanns were already considered as suspects. That way of doing things disrupts the strategy adopted for the investigation, which the Portuguese and English police agreed on

Disgusting; Gonc could not even be bothered to check it out; the UK police did. Gonc had already written Madeleine off - the UK police hadn't, and still haven't to this day.

And he has the nerve to describe the UK police speaking to the McCanns about the photo as 'incomprehensible'?

To describe it as 'ludicrous'?

Why? What is 'ludicrous' about a responsible police force letting the parents of a missing child know that a child has been seen which could, just possibly, be their daughter?

Was Gonc scared his 'thesis' was about to be wrecked by Madeleine being found? Because it sure sounds like it.."

The fact of UK police showed the McCanns the photo, is the proper behaviour, because, as parents, they know her very well, so the UK police did what should be expected.

amaral told about the disrupt. I´m glad that the UK police acted like that, besides, the only one who disrupted everything in the PJ´s investigation was gonçalo amaral.

The UK police showed the photo because the McCanns are the true parents of the child, they were in the UK.

suspects only in amaral´s sick brain

about: "Incomprehensible to say the least. We are shocked by the behaviour", this applies only to amaral´s disgusting behaviour.

Thinking about what Gonc did from a logical perspective doesn't seem to help as much as thinking about him from the perspective that he is an alcoholic. His thesis/es could only make sense if your brain is addled by something. Addicts do not take responsibility for their problems or own up to their lies. It's always someone else's fault.

Look at this - it's from Gonc's own book:



Friday May 4th

This morning I am worried; something isn't right in the account of the events:

Less than twelve hours since Madeleine went missing.

Is Gonc interested in finding the child?

NO

Is he interested in stitching up her family?

YES

Oh, and you will note that he fails to mention that that is the day he was made an arguido for his role in the forced confession of the mother of another missing child.........

Oh, that also makes more sense as to why he was glued to the bar stool on the evening of May 3rd. Drowning his sorrows as to what would await him the following day when he was made arguido.

How convenient that he had one stock thesis for both cases.

I agree with you lily, bb1.

Thank you Pedro.

you welcome lily.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither the Portuguese investigators nor Scotland Yard think that the parents are involved in her disappearance in any way whatsoever. Mr Amaral's book is considered of little help in Portugal , most of his allegations are unfounded. - German journalist in email to hater
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------