FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

**bb1** Wed Oct 26, 2011 5:26 pm

As the hounders are now occupying themselves making up stories about yet another individual, clearly having learned NOTHING from the stories Bennett made up about Murat's stepson, the stories Bennett made up about Kennedy, the stories Bennett made up about Smethurst - perhaps they should read this.

Oh, and please note - the grown ups sorted it out THREE AND A HALF YEARS AGO.

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t20-photograph-of-madeleine-especially-for-stevo-of-the-3-a-s

Photograph of Madeleine/Especially For Stevo of the 3 A's!!!
by christabel on Tue Apr 29, 2008 8:27 pm

Just to let you all know about that photo Pratonthebeam and vile find so provocative, and they say was done by a professional photographer WAS NOT.
I have emailed Paul Grover this morning and his reply came back

Hello Chris,

yes i did copy it from the family in Glasgow but i dont
know why it has my name on it I work for the Telegraph so it might
have someting to do with that i hope this helps you.

Paul

Oh dear, wrong again no homework done.
I must put this on Supertroll site for them to see FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS 245193

FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS 245193

But if the Hounders feel like making yet another public apology, and yet another donation to the Find Madeleine find, who are we to stop them?

Good comments here, too -

http://justice4mccannfam.5forum.biz/t20-photograph-of-madeleine-especially-for-stevo-of-the-3-a-s

**lily** Wed Oct 26, 2011 6:08 pm

They certainly know how to make themselves sound reasonable and intelligent to the media, don't they?

rofl

**bb1** Wed Oct 26, 2011 11:28 pm

Someone did indeed email Mr Glover, and got this irate reply:

Re: Paul Grover - photographer to the stars
Willo Today
I also emailed Mr Grover through his business website last night asking why, where and for whom these photos were taken and were they photoshopped and this morning had five replies from an iphone.

1/ To answer your questions I Sid not photograph Madeleine I copies the photos from her grandmothers album when she went missing

2/ Also the the pics are not Lolita pics they are family pics taken by members of the family if you think they are Lolita pics your problem

3/ And no they are not altered in phot shop

4/ I kind of get fed up with people thinking that I take pics of young girls there was nothing sinister they are not my pictures! So let that be the end of it

5/ Hello Willo, Not sure what you are implying but I did not have ever photographed Madeleine McCann I copied her grandmothers phot album I am not sure why people (you are not the first) think they are "Lolita" style pics I never thought that when I saw them if you have a problem with the style of the photos have a word with the family because THEY ARE NOT MINE!

So the photos were taken by a family member!!! Mr.Grover it seems has become innocently involved. Another outsider dragged into the mire.

What a *&^**^%*** cheek!

Innocently involved? Dragged into the mire?

IT'S THEM WHO HAVE DRAGGED THE PHOTOGRAPHER INTO THE MIRE, WITH THEIR FILTHY MINDS AND FILTHIER IMAGININGS, WHICH THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF KEEPING TO THEMSELVES.

Personally, I hope Mr Glover slaps yet another lawsuit on them for this.

**Maggs** Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:39 am

bb1 wrote:Someone did indeed email Mr Glover, and got this irate reply:

Re: Paul Grover - photographer to the stars
Willo Today
I also emailed Mr Grover through his business website last night asking why, where and for whom these photos were taken and were they photoshopped and this morning had five replies from an iphone.

1/ To answer your questions I Sid not photograph Madeleine I copies the photos from her grandmothers album when she went missing

2/ Also the the pics are not Lolita pics they are family pics taken by members of the family if you think they are Lolita pics your problem

3/ And no they are not altered in phot shop

4/ I kind of get fed up with people thinking that I take pics of young girls there was nothing sinister they are not my pictures! So let that be the end of it

5/ Hello Willo, Not sure what you are implying but I did not have ever photographed Madeleine McCann I copied her grandmothers phot album I am not sure why people (you are not the first) think they are "Lolita" style pics I never thought that when I saw them if you have a problem with the style of the photos have a word with the family because THEY ARE NOT MINE!

So the photos were taken by a family member!!! Mr.Grover it seems has become innocently involved. Another outsider dragged into the mire.

What a *&^**^%*** cheek!

Innocently involved? Dragged into the mire?

IT'S THEM WHO HAVE DRAGGED THE PHOTOGRAPHER INTO THE MIRE, WITH THEIR FILTHY MINDS AND FILTHIER IMAGININGS, WHICH THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF KEEPING TO THEMSELVES.

Personally, I hope Mr Glover slaps yet another lawsuit on them for this.

Why would Mr Grover write in foreign when he's English.
Looks like old Willo's wilted a bit
Is that Emily at the bottle again? yaydance

**bb1** Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:41 am

Yes, she was hurling foul-mouthed abuse on a couple of sites earlier. I think she should be encouraged, really, she is doing a splendid job of showing up the pitchforkers Pcorneater

**Sabot** Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:13 am

bb1 wrote:Someone did indeed email Mr Glover, and got this irate reply:

Re: Paul Grover - photographer to the stars
Willo Today
I also emailed Mr Grover through his business website last night asking why, where and for whom these photos were taken and were they photoshopped and this morning had five replies from an iphone.

1/ To answer your questions I Sid not photograph Madeleine I copies the photos from her grandmothers album when she went missing

2/ Also the the pics are not Lolita pics they are family pics taken by members of the family if you think they are Lolita pics your problem

3/ And no they are not altered in phot shop

4/ I kind of get fed up with people thinking that I take pics of young girls there was nothing sinister they are not my pictures! So let that be the end of it

5/ Hello Willo, Not sure what you are implying but I did not have ever photographed Madeleine McCann I copied her grandmothers phot album I am not sure why people (you are not the first) think they are "Lolita" style pics I never thought that when I saw them if you have a problem with the style of the photos have a word with the family because THEY ARE NOT MINE!

So the photos were taken by a family member!!! Mr.Grover it seems has become innocently involved. Another outsider dragged into the mire.

What a *&^**^%*** cheek!

Innocently involved? Dragged into the mire?

IT'S THEM WHO HAVE DRAGGED THE PHOTOGRAPHER INTO THE MIRE, WITH THEIR FILTHY MINDS AND FILTHIER IMAGININGS, WHICH THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF KEEPING TO THEMSELVES.

Personally, I hope Mr Glover slaps yet another lawsuit on them for this.

I read that late last night and couldn't think of what to say. Their dirty minds are the fault of The McCanns?

You can't argue with this logic about photos from a Grandmother's Photo Album. So I suppose Granny is a pervert now.
Must take a look at the photos of my grandchildren. There's one of me with a bottle stuck in the mouth of one of mine. Eek

**Lamplighter** Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:45 am

Would it be this? www.virtualglobaltaskforce.com LL

Police from the UK, Canada, Australia and the US have launched a "one-stop shop" website for children to report online paedophilia.

Police said that virtualglobaltaskforce.com has been designed to make the internet safer for children.

The UK's National Crime Squad has led the initiative with Interpol and its counterparts in Australia, Canada and the US. Technology companies MSN, Vodafone, AOL and BT have backed the scheme.

Home Office minister Paul Goggins said: "It is only through building partnerships like these that we can be effective in protecting children and making the internet safe for children. Child protection on the internet is an issue where the UK has consistently led the world in our commitment to tackling the problem, in our readiness to work in partnership with all those who have a role to play and in our ability to think innovatively about solutions."

The website provides information for children on how to use the internet safely and links to a range of support agencies. It also offers a confidential channel for users to report online child abuse.

**bb1** Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:54 am

We know that paedophiles frequent forums discussing children whether they are missing, murdered or otherwise. At least one was exposed and dealt with by police on the Ramsey forums. He regularly made posts about JonBenet Ramsey which were startling similar to those being made on havern's forum by these disgusting individuals.

Indeed, Jay - and it is especially disturbing as 'tigger' is the one who uses Mein Kampf as a source of information about children's hair color.

**bb1** Thu Oct 27, 2011 12:21 pm

The photograph on the floor says: 'come and get me' - I'm not making this up, if a woman lies like this in front of a man it's a clear signal. Try and lie in that pose, you'll see what I mean.

What??? I do hope CEOPS are keeping an eye on these sickos.

**Maggs** Thu Oct 27, 2011 2:09 pm

Jayelles wrote:This is the organisation I was reading about:-

http://www.iwf.org.uk/

They might be able to advise if nothing else.

Seems like they have IT professionals Jay, just what is needed.

The Internet Watch Foundation is the UK hotline for the public and IT professionals to report online criminal content in a secure and confidential way. Our remit covers three areas:
•child sexual abuse images* hosted anywhere in the world
•criminally obscene adult content hosted in the UK
•non-photographic child sexual abuse images hosted in the UK.

Removal of Criminal Online Content UK

‘Notice and takedown’ service

The IWF’s ‘notice and takedown’ service is central to our existence and concerns the systematic removal of content within our remit from UK networks. Any content assessed by our Internet Content Analysts as child sexual abuse, non-photographic child sexual abuse images or criminally obscene adult content which is hosted in the UK is swiftly removed at source following a notice from the IWF to the hosting provider. This process is carried out in partnership with the relevant police agency to ensure any relevant evidence is preserved.

This process has operated since 1996 and is UK-wide. As a result the volume of UK-hosted child sexual abuse content has reduced from 18% of the total known to the IWF in 1997 to less than 1% since 2003.

**bb1** Thu Oct 27, 2011 4:46 pm

I see they are up to their old tricks again, cloning members of 'pro' sites. The only people they are fooling are themselves Pcorneater

**lily** Thu Oct 27, 2011 6:56 pm

bb1 wrote:The photograph on the floor says: 'come and get me' - I'm not making this up, if a woman lies like this in front of a man it's a clear signal. Try and lie in that pose, you'll see what I mean.

What??? I do hope CEOPS are keeping an eye on these sickos.

I hope they are too. That comment surely comes from a dark sick place. mad

With a bit of luck, SY are keeping an eye on them following Bennett and his Hounders' badgering of them with their so called 'evidence'?

**sans_souci** Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:04 pm

I just hope that none of them have children of their own. Or come into contact with children.

**lily** Thu Oct 27, 2011 7:23 pm

sans_souci wrote:I just hope that none of them have children of their own. Or come into contact with children.

Sans, I agree as that is a very real and worrying danger.

**Maggs** Sat Oct 29, 2011 3:01 pm

lily wrote:
sans_souci wrote:I just hope that none of them have children of their own. Or come into contact with children.

Sans, I agree as that is a very real and worrying danger.

I wouldn't worry Lily, don't forget Paul Grover works for the Telegraph. Might be a nice little story for them to print.
As usual the perv's got the wrong person, but he's been informed wave

**lily** Sat Oct 29, 2011 5:40 pm

Jayelles wrote:The only thing disturbing about that "Paul Grover" thread are the comments of JD, Tigger, Marian & co who salivate over a photo of a three year old little girl and discuss in vivid imaginative detail how she is being sexually provocative in it.

Their comments and thoughts are stomach turning.

I have read accounts of interviews with paedophiles and this is exactly the way they interpret childrens' behaviour.

We know that paedophiles frequent forums discussing children whether they are missing, murdered or otherwise. At least one was exposed and dealt with by police on the Ramsey forums. He regularly made posts about JonBenet Ramsey which were startling similar to those being made on havern's forum by these disgusting individuals.

Some of these creeps are claiming to be grandmothers. I don't buy it. How perfect a cover for a filthy old paedo would that be?

The topic has been dragged out once more but the posters' names have changed. Same comments........ mad

Maggs, in my complete disgust I forgot that. I also hope Mr Grover is saving all of this for an edition of the Telegraph.

**lily** Sat Oct 29, 2011 11:37 pm

Jay, the Hounders keep trotting that photo out in new threads just so they can discuss it all over again. Bennett and Peter Mac have made some horrible posts about it before, using the same expressions and on and on. I know that some of those posts were on our old forum and Tony also has some screen shots.

**lily** Sun Oct 30, 2011 5:59 pm

No worries, Jay.

Sponsored content

FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS

Re: FOR THE BENEFIT OF PITCHFORKERS WITH GRUBBY MINDS