Bennett's Turned Up

crazytony wrote:

honestbroker wrote:I have no idea who Dr. Roberts is but I would sure like to hear him cross-examine both McCanns.

So would I, actually.

I reckon the McCanns would make mincemeat of him ...

Oh, and Dr Roberts is actually Nigel Moore ...

Nigel Moore who owns the mccanfiles site?

Yup; just another wannabe fake, Tony. He's about as much a 'Doctor' of anything as I am an astronaut.

The one who has unearned income through begging. That Nigel. Gotcha!

Well Nigel has to earn the donations somehow, and if they don't keep his Site going then Dr Roberts will take his expertise elsewhere.

Hilarious - the forkers are now trying to spin the line that Bennett didn't intend to sell the leaflet.....


Tell it to the Judge

PS - I don't think



is really going to help his defence.

Stop, just stop it now. You are confusing me. How do you sell something you don't mean to sell?

You don't, Tony. I wonder if that is why the topic was very hastily removed from MM?

bb1 wrote:You don't, Tony. I wonder if that is why the topic was very hastily removed from MM?

Picture it, I put the leaflet in an envelope, by accident. I sealed the envelope, by accident. I then put a stamp on it after I had addressed it, by accident. It then accidentally fell into the mail box, your honor

After I had accidentally asked you to pay by a cheque made out to my mother, and you accidentally sent me a £5 note which I accidentally forgot to send back and accidentally pocketed instead

Nope, can't see that one working too well in court.

bb1 wrote:After I had accidentally asked you to pay by a cheque made out to my mother, and you accidentally sent me a £5 note which I accidentally forgot to send back and accidentally pocketed instead

Nope, can't see that one working too well in court.

Nope, not working for me neither

Didn't Bennett say something about managing to find a copy? Or did it turn up in his letter box by accident?

I have at last located a copy of ’60 Reasons’.

If you would like me to arrange to send it to you, please send a cheque for £5.00 made out to ‘Maria Bennett’

I really cannot see the judge being very impressed with that; it sounds pretty intentional to me - and wanting the cheque to be made out to his mother makes things WORSE, not better.

bb1 wrote:I have at last located a copy of ’60 Reasons’.

If you would like me to arrange to send it to you, please send a cheque for £5.00 made out to ‘Maria Bennett’

I really cannot see the judge being very impressed with that; it sounds pretty intentional to me - and wanting the cheque to be made out to his mother makes things WORSE, not better.

Mike Gunnill did not hold a gun to Bennett's headforcing him to sell him a copy.
All Bennett Had to say was,NO

"AT LAST LOCATED." Quite hard work then. And not very accidental.

Sabot wrote:
"AT LAST LOCATED." Quite hard work then. And not very accidental.

Didn't the ghastly SYM creature who lives in Barry, Glamorgan have loads of copies - wasn't there correspondence from her to bent tit about her having lots of copies of either the 10 reasons or the 60 reasons? LL

Lamplighter wrote:

Sabot wrote:
"AT LAST LOCATED." Quite hard work then. And not very accidental.

Didn't the ghastly SYM creature who lives in Barry, Glamorgan have loads of copies - wasn't there correspondence from her to bent tit about her having lots of copies of either the 10 reasons or the 60 reasons? LL

Yes. There are emails from Bennett advising her on how best to sell them and how to pay him for them.

so who dispatched the leaflet, Sym or Tone?

What was on the postmark on the envelope?

Is Tone hinting that someone sent him the leaflet and he then sent it on?

Sym had the booklets and the leaflets so it must have been her. Probably not illegal on her part at the time since she hadn't signed an undertaking.
But the point is that Bennett was telling her how best to sell them and how to let him have to money. That was against the terms of the undertaking he signed.
The Emails are on Tony's Blog.

Sabot wrote:
Sym had the booklets and the leaflets so it must have been her. Probably not illegal on her part at the time since she hadn't signed an undertaking.
But the point is that Bennett was telling her how best to sell them and how to let him have to money. That was against the terms of the undertaking he signed.
The Emails are on Tony's Blog.

I thought he might try and wriggle out of it by saying it was Sym, not him sending it out--but at the end of the day the stupid told the purchaser to send a cheque made out to his mother, sent to his address--he couldn't have made more of a perfect paper trail could he?

Who is this "Maria Bennett"?

That appears to be his very elderly mother, Pedro - which does rather show that Bennett knew perfectly well he was doing wrong.

Why else would he want the money put in a third party's bank account?

How stupid are these people?

Ive come to the conclusion that whatever happens with Tony he will except it, and the Mccanns will regrest persuing a pensioner

For the millionth time...

BENNETT IS NOT A PENSIONER

He was born in September 1947 - he is younger than that poor old soul David Bowie and much younger than the truly ancient Mick Jagger.

Bennett is supposed to be working for a living. That he apparently manages not to, and to finance several holidays a year, really ought to be telling them something.

As should the fact that he has TOO MUCH MONEY TO GET LEGAL AID.

On the other hand, do I actually care if these gullible fools hand over their cash - it might teach them a lesson when it finally dawns on them that they have been taken for a ride.

Now there's a thought. Several Holidays a Year. And he is unemployed. I wonder how he pays for those.

Quite, Sabot.

It is an ongoing wonder to me that the Truthseekers are so easily fooled by his 'poor old soul' act.

He may well go round looking like an elderly tramp, but he clearly has far more money squirrelled away somewhere than just about everyone else nowadays.

And - he should be in gainful employment at his age. That he doesn't have to work for a living really should be telling them something.