..So, just who is Soya Pouter?

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton  
@Syn0nymph @B_balou I thought what you all did was masterful. It's vital to expose people like that. Couldn't happen to nicer person.

As observers know, their Cunning Plan was anything but 'masterful'; it was actually rank, total stupidity, as is explained here:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6589&start=725


Re: They LIE when they say they are not haters!
Postby Randomleigh » Wed Dec 31, 2014 10:30 am

And the only thing 'exposed' is what a muppet Soya is for taking these morons at their word, and walking right into it. People would be forgiven for deciding she simply doesn't have the smarts to get involved with anything more complicated than talking about shoes, something simple like that, or b*tching about her media twin Hopkins.

I simply cannot understand why anyone coming late to the case would take the word of the likes of Bennett and PeterMac. If these idiots are correct, why weren't The McCanns banged up yonks ago?
Or does she seriously believe that the whole World and his wife, and two Police Forces are conspiring to protect two very ordinary Doctors?

Oh, it's got far worse than Bennett and co, Sabot - he seems to be trying to put clear, blue water between himself and the even-more-lunatic fringe.

Soya now seems to be getting her 'research' from any multi-headed hydra troll that tells her she's wonderful, mwah mwah, and not checking ANYTHING. And personally, I think this is excellent, and should be encouraged; she was already on course for disaster, but now?

WITH FRIENDS LIKE THOSE, WHO NEEDS ENEMIES?

The sad thing is that Sonia will probably just fade away into oblivion like all those other wannabes before her. All failed. Although I have forgotten who and how many now.
One might think she would see it coming. But since her fan club will accept any old shite, then perhaps not.

But she is never going to make a career on this one, or any other one. Look at what happened to The People's Voice. How big an audience did that have? Before it made a right tit of itself, when of course, we all joined in for a laugh.

And I mean, Wembley? Have you ever been to Wembley? Next door to Neasden.

Thankfully, I have never been to Wembley. Or Neasden.

Always a good idea when getting involved in controversial, high-profile matters to fact-check for yourself, then double check, and recheck - not just take the word of any half-crazy multi-headed Arthur or Martha. Just because it's what you want to hear, it doesn't make it true.

I've lost count of the number of these wannabees that are finally going to Crack the Case, Sabot - and oh, how we laughed at their very predictable downfall. It was obvious to any sane person that 2&2 were yet more chancers, with their promises of great Revelations and Case-cracking, but did the haters see that? No, not for a minute, they only saw what they wanted to see.

'Rowena Tarot'? That's the best one yet.

The thing is that the people who seriously doubt the innocence of The McCanns are such a small minority of the minority of people who are actively interested in The Affair McCann.
And if she is going for the people who aren't interested then she is wasting her time because they aren't interested.

This is a specialised subject which attracts obsessives like me who have time on their hands, some of whom know what they are talking about, and some who clearly don't. Nothing much is going to change the already established balance, beyond a few nutters who are already obsessing about something else, and getting bored with it.

I would guess that there is an audience of about 2,000, including Socks, mostly on the negative side, because people like me can't be bothered to create a Sock. So I am not seeing a great boost to Sonia's career coming up.
She would do better to stick to chasing after politicians and screeching libellous abuse, although I don't see any of them paying her the courtesy of suing her.

The perpetual failure of their endless petitions would suggest there are actually far fewer than even 2,000, Sabot, bearing in mind that their petitions rarely get above the 1,200 mark, and that includes sigs by made-up names, socks and hydras.

The haters see EVERYTHING through McCann-blinkers, so fail to grasp that it simply is not of that great importance, or of great interest to the general population. The reaction of most people is to think it was stupid to leave the children alone, but there but for the grace of God.... and to hope that the Yard can still pull off the miracle and find Madeleine, and reunite her with her family.

They are NOT interested in endless, recycled sh*te about shutters, dogs, etc, and would no more pester the Yard, the BBC, the Home Office, Uncle Tom Cobley and all, with deranged Theories than they would grow wings and fly.

Hatebloggers and manufacturers of fake Truthtelling 'documentaries' are only ever preaching to the choir - and a pretty small choir it is, too.

We know that, Bonny, but they don't seem to. What with Bennett and his thousands of hits per day. Who are actually people like me going there for a laugh.

I see the haters are getting their panties in a bunch about this:



Apparently, this is a Terrible Threat to Soya, and not, as any sane non-conspiraloon would understand it, a reference to criminal and civil law.

After all, no-one is fantasising about slapping faces or kicking teeth in, as Leyland did about the McCann family. As she was also given to hanging around Rothley ranting, it's odd that none of the haters seemed to be in the least bit bothered about Leyland's threats of real violence.

Haters always were hypocrites.

I expect Brenda was joking or being ironic

Sabot wrote:I expect Brenda was joking or being ironic

What, like that special Portuguese irony they have in court rooms? Or maybe it was said satirically - haters love satire. But generally only if it's obscene.

bb1 wrote:

Sabot wrote:I expect Brenda was joking or being ironic

What, like that special Portuguese irony they have in court rooms? Or maybe it was said satirically - haters love satire. But generally only if it's obscene.

That's the word I wuz looking for. Satirical. But the spelling escaped my mind for a minute.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2014/jul/16/cannabis-paranoia-psychoactive-thc-mood

A good few of the haters would do well to inform themselves of the links between cannabis use and paranoia.

I believe we have discussed this many times before about some of their membership?

Sonia Poulton
‏@SoniaPoulton
@w_nicht @portugalpress incidentally PP, thought that was good piece you did about doc, TY, except you used a quote from one of my trolls!

Soya wants to censor media if they fail to worship at her feet.

So, Soya has done what Soya does best - causes trouble and incites people to take 'sides' and join her middle-aged girly gang, the latest group to get the treatment being the Hounders.

Due to failure of Senior Hounders to be overwhelmed with enthusiasm for her latest doolally project, the girly gang has been shrieking and pointing at them.

It's a very familiar pattern; it has happened in every single group she's decided to manipulate. You're either with Soya or you're against her, as many have found out.

Just wait, the Hounders will be accused of:

1. Not being 'transparent'.

2. Having 'something to hide'.

3. Being 'trolls'.

4. Being involved in covering up child abuse.

And finally, she will threaten to send her spot-squeezing cameraman and her ex-jailbird, gun fan boyfriend to their homes.

The evidence of her MO is all over the internet.

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1082p30-sonia-poulton-exposed-part-2

Oh dear, yoyo sounds a bit annoyed with the girlies.


What IS your problem? Oh.......ummm.....btw..I'm not interested...don't bother to formulate a reply. I don't need another sharp as a marble utterance from you - it will just be more of the same old same old ...moaning and whinging.
Spit out your dummy all you want (I already know you will), I won't give a monkey arse.

Wonder if he's ever considered taking up diplomacy? He'd be a real asset at the conference table.

Gawd, her pal Mutton doesn't half talk some bollox.

Those two, and the rest of the girlie giggles gang, really should stick to diets, polka-dot diaries, shoes, that sort of thing, and not do anything difficult like thinking.

And a pitchfork with fluffy pink ribbons is still a pitchfork.

Another Free Speach but only for me Merchant. They all tumble down the same road in the end.

Quite. Soya can make any allegations that come into her head, accuse anyone she feels like accusing of anything she feels like accusing them of, but God forbid anyone should dare point out she is somewhat less than perfect herself!

All dissidents must be silenced!

If her Documentary actually gets off the ground, she might discover what Free Speech is really all about.

She has put herself out there so she must accept that other people have a right to criticise. Libel is only an opinion after all.

I personally think Soya should be given every possible encouragement to make her 'documentary', Sabot, as there are only going to be two possible outcomes.

1. She's going to make a complete dog's breakfast of it, like all her other 'documentaries' and be an even bigger laughing stock. It's most interesting to see how little support she has in 'alternative media' world.

OR:

2. Post-inquest, she's going to shaft the girlie gigglers and do an expose of the hate squad and how they fooled her, which would bring in mega-bucks.

Either way, she chose to insert herself into the McCann case for her own ends, so the girlie squeaks about 'trolls' are little more than play-acting.

As ever, time will tell.

Personally, I think she is going to obfuscate, and say nothing much at all. This won't go down well with her supporters, who want blood.
But who really cares, beyond a laugh? This one has already been done to death.

I think she is going to play it to see which way she can get the most out of it.

She doesn't need all that time to make a third rate so called documentary. Heck, you could make a prime time TV show during the amount of time she has......

lily wrote:I think she is going to play it to see which way she can get the most out of it.  

She doesn't need all that time to make a third rate so called documentary.   Heck, you could make a prime time TV show during the amount of time she has......

She is probably hoping that The Coroner will make some reference to Brenda being hounded to her death. This is extremely unlikely. Any more than I think The Coroner will make any in-depth reference to Brenda's Tweets.

In my opinion, Brenda committed suicide while the balance of her mind was disturbed. And that is what I think we will get.

Play that one, Sonia.