Bennett's Turned Up

Can you imagine the impact it will have on their employment? Boss finds out, and they are out.

Oh, I see he's added a bit to his replies to his fan club:

Jay 2001 wrote: Mrs M told Aled Jones that she could forgive the 'abductor', but she and the team have pursued TB and GA with ruthless zeal.

REPLY: Forgiveness is of course a fundamental Christian principle. When Peter enquired: 'Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive hm? Till seven times? - Christ answered: 'I say not unto thee until seven times, but, until seventy times seven'. [That's 490 by the way].

aiyoyo wrote: It is a breach against TB's right to freedom of free speech. Besides GM himself claimed he believes in free speech and people are free to purport theories.

REPLY: Dr Gerald McCann told Lord Leveson on oath that he was a strong believer in freedom of speech.

Jay2001 wrote: Tony appealed for 'legal' type help and I hope that he gets it - there must be some brains out there who could help

REPLY: You don't have to be a legal eagle to help look over my statement, just an eye for things I might have missed, or not put as well as I should

==================

Yes, that's really impressive, snivelling and quoting the Bible in the vain hope that the McCanns will forgive you for what you did, Bennett.

And I think it's time to remind the hounders and forkers of what Gerry McCann ACTUALLY said, not what they are trying to twist it into.

I would like to emphasise that I strongly believe in freedom of speech, but where you have people who are repeatedly carrying out inaccuracies and have been shown to do so, then they should be held to account. That is the issue. I don’t have a problem with somebody purporting a theory, writing fiction, suggestions, but clearly we’ve got to a stage where substandard reporting and sources, unnamed, made-up, non-verifiable, are a daily occurrence.

Stop missing out the bits you don't like - the only people you are fooling are yourselves.

As for that pathetic plea to get someone to check his statement - looks like he's out of luck, doesn't it? With the mighty brainpower the forkers are famous for, one has decided this is governed by Australian law, the feng shui fortune teller thinks Portuguese law is relevant, and another one thinks it will help by withholding its council tax.

And that is what comes of insulting people just to get your ego stroked by stupid forkers, isn't it?

REPLY: Forgiveness is of course a fundamental Christian principle. When Peter enquired: 'Lord, how oft shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive hm? Till seven times? - Christ answered: 'I say not unto thee until seven times, but, until seventy times seven'. [That's 490 by the way].
And the Lord sayeth, do unto others as you would have done unto you.

Well they do only know how to conduct a Kangaroo Court, so some of it could be pertinent.

DON'T GET MAD, GET EVEN - Steve Tyler

Another genius forker:

Cerebralis Cerebralis
Does similar happen in Portugal?courts.sa.gov.au/community/goin… Have Amaral & #Mccann had 1 of these hearings?Has this given rise to change of lawyer



Here's a clue, Einstein:

bb1 wrote:Oh, stop it, my sides hurt!

TheToon1892 NUFC 1892
@
@BacardiKid @spudgun01 You should start a campaign, everyone in support of Bennett refuses to pay council tax until #McCann´s investigated

Fantastic idea! You can all get your goods siezed and join Bennett in jail, that'll really show those McCanns who's boss

NUFC 1892

@TheToon1892 view full profile →

Mallorca
Like he is going to suffer if they don't pay the tax.

MWHAHAHAHAHAHA

So, the one inciting them all to dodge paying their council tax lives in Spain? You couldn't make it up

Plaintiff cry from a hounder:

There must be something that can be done, I don't know what but surely we can do something!!

All too, too late now. Bennett had chance after chance to stop his vile behaviour, and just escalated his abuse and harrassment. He was offered good advice, and repaid that by sneering at the person giving it, and encouraged the rest of his rabble to do likewise.

He topped that display of atrocious manners by posting emails - he's no gentleman, that's for sure.

There is also the small matter of his giving his solemn oath to Her Majesty, in the person of the High Court, to behave himself.

He then proceeded to drive a coach and horses through that agreement. He has no honor, he is, to use old-fashioned words, a bounder and a cad, whose word simply cannot be trusted.

There's no way out of this jam for him.

And with any luck, Middle England is going to be treated to headlines about him that will make VILE SICKOS look like a compliment.

All of which is entirely his own fault.

bb1 wrote:Plaintiff cry from a hounder:

There must be something that can be done, I don't know what but surely we can do something!!

All too, too late now. Bennett had chance after chance to stop his vile behaviour, and just escalated his abuse and harrassment. He was offered good advice, and repaid that by sneering at the person giving it, and encouraged the rest of his rabble to do likewise.

He topped that display of atrocious manners by posting emails - he's no gentleman, that's for sure.

There is also the small matter of his giving his solemn oath to Her Majesty, in the person of the High Court, to behave himself.

He then proceeded to drive a coach and horses through that agreement. He has no honor, he is, to use old-fashioned words, a bounder and a cad, whose word simply cannot be trusted.

There's no way out of this jam for him.

And with any luck, Middle England is going to be treated to headlines about him that will make VILE SICKOS look like a compliment.

All of which is entirely his own fault.

Hare today, gone tomorrow You have seen who has visited my blog, haven't you Bonny

You get the most interesting visitors, Tony

Bennett's quote from when he agreed to the terms.
On Friday 13 November I sent the following letter to Carter-Ruck:

"Further to my e-mail of yesterday’s date, and your most recent letter of 10 November, I confirm that I will accept the requirements your clients seek to impose on me. I therefore herewith sign and return the undertaking with a penal notice that you require me to sign and I will pay the £440.00 your clients require. Please find my cheque in the sum of £440.00 enclosed.

Is Bennett going to say to the judge, "excuse me your honor but, I found out the order I signed was too sweeping. It took me over two years to find out, that's why I haven't complained before" ?

If he tries that one, then clearly, he is not fit to appear in court or anywhere else, and should be sectioned to protect him from himself, Tony.

And- remember the carry-on he had, because CR refunded him £40? He didn't think that was too sweeping, he was positively crowing about it.

Does anyone else get the impression that reality, and panic, is settling in with the hounders?

Tony I do hope that you can and will have someone who will attend the hearing with you. There must be someone who can go over your statement, so I hope someone does come forward to help. More than anything I wish you success.

There isn't anyone - none of the forkers and hounders are bright enough. They've proved that with their efforts at 'helping' today.

Looks like Bennett will just have to get on with it, doesn't it? It's his own fault, no-one else's.

bb1 wrote:If he tries that one, then clearly, he is not fit to appear in court or anywhere else, and should be sectioned to protect him from himself, Tony.

And- remember the carry-on he had, because CR refunded him £40? He didn't think that was too sweeping, he was positively crowing about it.

Does anyone else get the impression that reality, and panic, is settling in with the hounders?

Tony I do hope that you can and will have someone who will attend the hearing with you. There must be someone who can go over your statement, so I hope someone does come forward to help. More than anything I wish you success.

There isn't anyone - none of the forkers and hounders are bright enough. They've proved that with their efforts at 'helping' today.

Looks like Bennett will just have to get on with it, doesn't it? It's his own fault, no-one else's.

What about is buddy Sharon or even Peter Macloud?

Look now, Bennett knows that he is a dead duck. He is just after sympathy and money, both of which he will get because they are intellectually challenged. He also knows this, which is why he was waiting for someone to suggest Donations, as he knew they would.
I don't know how much he can raise, but it will be better than a kick in the teeth. And no doubt some of them are offering up money making schemes as we speak.
When is their next Konference, by the way? Tombola might be quite good fun, and he could always raffle off his shopping trolly.

He could ask Gonc for the foundation's money back?

crazytony wrote:He could ask Gonc for the foundation's money back?

That's a good one, Tony - I don't think they are ever going to see that again

crazytony wrote:He could ask Gonc for the foundation's money back?

I've got a good idea. I think The Justice for Gonc Fund should make a donation to The Justice for Bennett Fund. No?

Yes, if Morais ever gets around to doing the accounts.

Sabot wrote:

crazytony wrote:He could ask Gonc for the foundation's money back?

I've got a good idea. I think The Justice for Gonc Fund should make a donation to The Justice for Bennett Fund. No?

Yes, and I second that.

Motion Carried. Someone inform the Parties.

Next.

I am genuinely flabbergasted that anyone would think of giving Bennett a penny, when the reason he can't get legal aid is that

HE HAS TOO MUCH MONEY

Wonder how many of his fans have considerably more than £8,000 in the bank?

bb1 wrote:I am genuinely flabbergasted that anyone would think of giving Bennett a penny, when the reason he can't get legal aid is that

HE HAS TOO MUCH MONEY

Wonder how many of his fans have considerably more than £8,000 in the bank?

I am surprised he hasn't gone crawling to mommy.

It's an absolute piece of nonsense, Tony - and Bennett must know he hasn't a snowball's in Hell chance, or he would happily pay the bill for his own defence.

That he won't, says all that is needed about his case.