Cease and Desist?

bb1 wrote:

I knew someone would have screengrabbed the original:

http://regretsandramblings.com/2012/02/02/cease-and-desist/

Bren nabbed it:





You couldn't make it up.

Glory be. Give Bren a medal. She has finally totally exonerated herself for me.

Bennett may well have advised B$own on the letter, Bonny. Whoever wrote it it sounded embarrassingly unprofessional.

Well done Bren.

And just look at what Myths have nabbed:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post58985.html#p58985



Yes, I am sure Anorak would love to run a story about a pretendy profiler caught trying to drum up business with an idiotic scheme like this.

Said pretendy profiler not even managing to send stupid letter to the right person, and being caught red-handed trying to cover up her own blunder.

Sorry, I just can't resist it...

THE PROS ARE LAUGHING AT YOU

Is it Carly who is so fond of saying "the pros are laughing at us".

The term "Laughing" comes nowhere near....

We sure are.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/2012/02/pat-brown-is-idiot-in-my-opinion-of.html

Isabel, does not work for Carter And Ruck. She is a Portuguese Lawyer and works for the McCanns on Portuguese issues.
By accusing her of doing something she has not, don't be surprised Brown, if you are served with a writ of defamation, when you touch-down in Portugal.

Excellent point, Tony.

At the very least, the last shreds of the little reputation Brown had have just gone down the drain.

Can you get any more sloppy and unprofessional than accusing the wrong lawyer, in the wrong country?

Can we get something straight.

What purports to be a copy of a letter to Carter Ruck was dated 1st February 2012.

Today is the 2nd February.

So I assume the letter was sent yesterday. (if it actually exists, and actually was sent).

Could someone explain how it is now magically re-addressed to Adam Tudor. Did she pop down to the sorting office and amend it......?

Someone is playing games. And playing to her "audience". Rather sad, really.

lily wrote:We sure are.

Me? I am having a serious breathing attack. I might laugh later. For now, I can hardly believe that this has happened. There are no words to describe this abomination of crass stupidity.

I have to go shopping to recover my equilibrium.

sans_souci wrote:Can we get something straight.

What purports to be a copy of a letter to Carter Ruck was dated 1st February 2012.

Today is the 2nd February.

So I assume the letter was sent yesterday. (if it actually exists, and actually was sent).

Could someone explain how it is now magically re-addressed to Adam Tudor. Did she pop down to the sorting office and amend it......?

Someone is playing games. And playing to her "audience". Rather sad, really.

Could you pay some small attention to my Blood Pressure, Sans. I am so Gob Smacked that I am hyper ventilating, from the sheer audacity of this cretin. Just how stupid does she think we are?

I don't have time at the moment to read The Hate Sites. Back later.

Quite, sans, Brown has blown her own feet off spectacularly and publically.

I do hope her groupies are pestering the UK press about this - I swear I can hear gales of laughter coming from 6 St Andrew Street already.

After all, if Brown's 'research' is so poor, she can't even send a legal letter to the right lawyer, in the right country, then her 'research' on any subject at all is of no value whatsoever, is it?

And she can't blame anyone else for this spectacular b*ll's up, she did it to herself, even boasted, thinking she was being big and clever.

Good point here:

http://regretsandramblings.com/2012/02/02/cease-and-desist/

Now surely a lawyer would send an email, apologising for their error and send the corrected letter via attachment, wouldn’t they? And then you would expect Pat Brown to edit the post, explain the error and then post up the relevant email showing the apology and amended letter to Carter Ruck.

Oh well I expect before the day is out this post will increase in size even further…

Best thing Brown and Bremner could do after this is slink away and hide their blushes, before the mockery gets even worse.

And I do hope the many real profilers in the States who refuse to have anything to do with Brown are informed about this debacle.

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
Press Release: Cease and Desist Letter issued to Gerry and Kate McCann womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/2012/02/press-… #MadeleineMcCann #McCann #FreedomofSpeech
4 minutes ago

She really doesn't want to be drawing attention to that....best thing she could do is remove the post and forget all about issuing empty threats.

Seeing as how Bren nabbed the hilarious original.

ProfilerPatB PAT BROWN
Yes, I'm gong to LOOK for Maddie: Press Release: Cease and Desist Letter issued to Gerry and Kate McCann womenincrimeink.blogspot.com/2012/02/press-… #McCann

Obviously never heard of

WHEN IN A HOLE, STOP DIGGING

BrenR1958 Bren
@
@ProfilerPatB Is that Cease and Desist you are peddling version 1 or version 2? LOL #McCann

Can't wait to see the answer

bb1 wrote:BrenR1958 Bren
@
@ProfilerPatB Is that Cease and Desist you are peddling version 1 or version 2? LOL #McCann

Can't wait to see the answer

So, here's the thing.

Brown and Bremner have made a total b*lls-up before they have even started.

I assume Brown thought the sheeples wouldn't notice that she hastily altered her oh-so-important blogpost; there is certainly no sign of her issuing an apology.

Sadly for her, not everyone is as plain, well, thick as her fanclub, which is why Brown is now the laughing stock of this part of the internet.

There are only two possibilities for this 'letter'.

A. If it actually exists in the real world, the hard copy is now on its way to the wrong person, in the wrong country. If it arrives at CR, they don't even have to open it, they can Return it to Sender.

Or they can photocopy it and pass it round the office for everyone to laugh at. Then Return it to Sender.

B. It doesn't actually exist in the real world, which is why Brown thought she could get away with her hasty rewriting on the internet.

I vote for the latter.

bb1 wrote:So, here's the thing.

Brown and Bremner have made a total b*lls-up before they have even started.

I assume Brown thought the sheeples wouldn't notice that she hastily altered her oh-so-important blogpost; there is certainly no sign of her issuing an apology.

Sadly for her, not everyone is as plain, well, thick as her fanclub, which is why Brown is now the laughing stock of this part of the internet.

There are only two possibilities for this 'letter'.

A. If it actually exists in the real world, the hard copy is now on its way to the wrong person, in the wrong country. If it arrives at CR, they don't even have to open it, they can Return it to Sender.

Or they can photocopy it and pass it round the office for everyone to laugh at. Then Return it to Sender.

B. It doesn't actually exist in the real world, which is why Brown thought she could get away with her hasty rewriting on the internet.

Hell, I am going to ask the head honcho of Bremner's company!

sans_souci wrote:I vote for the latter.

Me too, as we have had past examples of supposed Press releases, haven't we? They are telling us golden oldies to keep warm as the temperature is plummeting - I am laughing so much I am lovely and warm!! LL

crazytony wrote:

bb1 wrote:So, here's the thing.

Brown and Bremner have made a total b*lls-up before they have even started.

I assume Brown thought the sheeples wouldn't notice that she hastily altered her oh-so-important blogpost; there is certainly no sign of her issuing an apology.

Sadly for her, not everyone is as plain, well, thick as her fanclub, which is why Brown is now the laughing stock of this part of the internet.

There are only two possibilities for this 'letter'.

A. If it actually exists in the real world, the hard copy is now on its way to the wrong person, in the wrong country. If it arrives at CR, they don't even have to open it, they can Return it to Sender.

Or they can photocopy it and pass it round the office for everyone to laugh at. Then Return it to Sender.

B. It doesn't actually exist in the real world, which is why Brown thought she could get away with her hasty rewriting on the internet.

Hell, I am going to ask the head honcho of Bremner's company!

Cheers Tony,

Was about to do the same

Tony, I back you 100% on doing that. You too Maggs.

That should be interesting.

Comment on Women in Crime blog - from Pat Brown

FYI, there was an error in the originally posted WCI blog due to accidental cut-and-paste. The recipient of the letter at Carter-Ruck IS Adam Tudor.

February 2, 2012 9:19 AM

_________________________________________

Er - right........

Seriously, if that is best that Pat can manage......

So, where did 'Isobel Duarte' come from, that her name could have been 'accidentally' C & P-ed in the middle of the letter to CR? Very poor quality spinning, indeed -

crazytony wrote:donsager@staffordfrey.com

Thanks Tony,

Hope David replies