BROWN FINALLY BLOGS - AND IT IS AWFUL

crazytony wrote:How many read the ex pat local rag?
Hell, I didn't know it existed until Pedro started posting it up.
And I imagine none of my fellow citizens have heard of it either. In my opinion, the school girl babbling in an ex pat rag achieves nothing for writer or Brown.

The whole thing has been...just woeful, Tony. After all that noise and melodrama, it comes down to this.

Has the woman no shame? People made not-very-funny jokes about her taking a spade, but no-one ever thought she would actually do it.

As for soil samples and metal detectors - she's been watching too much CSI.

She ar­rived in Lis­bon from Wash­ing­ton, D.C

Oh yes, it was Baltimore via London, wasn't it? Nothing like getting off to a good start.

bb1 wrote:

crazytony wrote:How many read the ex pat local rag?
Hell, I didn't know it existed until Pedro started posting it up.
And I imagine none of my fellow citizens have heard of it either. In my opinion, the school girl babbling in an ex pat rag achieves nothing for writer or Brown.

The whole thing has been...just woeful, Tony. After all that noise and melodrama, it comes down to this.

Has the woman no shame? People made not-very-funny jokes about her taking a spade, but no-one ever thought she would actually do it.

As for soil samples and metal detectors - she's been watching too much CSI.

Metal detector, means she was searching for a, Robot?
Soil samples, means checking for oil.
Spade, for making sand castles.
There, no big mystery at all

I dread to think what she is going to be churning out once she is over the 'jet lag', Tony.

this pat brown stinks.

crazytony wrote: She was cut off in mid sentence for the commercials

So what did the "professional" profiler actually discover from her visit to the crime scene then?

Well according to Natasha Donn (and don't forget this journalist didn't even get the simple fact of where Brown came from right) she learned how the locks operate, that the shutter and window CANNOT be opened from the outside and a bit about the terrain. Yep, that's it folks.

Beyond that Natasha tells us that Pat Brown's thinking hasn't changed at all.

So what happened with the metal detector, the spade and the soil sampler? Just silly gimmicks? Just examples of how Brown's basic research about PDL was so badly flawed?

Oh, that is nice: "She was cut off in mid sentence for the commercials"".

From that dire interview...

she found herself having rented a room for four weeks to a man she believed should have been “a person-of-interest” in a brutal sexual homicide. This unsettling experience was the start of her interest in profiling and how homicide cases are handled. It took six years for the police to bring the man in for questioning and declare him a suspect in the murder – and it led to Brown specialising in a profession that invariably finds itself called in way too late.

Yes, and what did the real police tell her? That the man was innocent, had nothing to do with anything.

They also told her to get a life, and a good few people have suggested she seek psychological counselling.


I honestly don’t know what the Metropolitan Police are doing with their current review of the case - which is costing millions of pounds. As far as I can see, they haven’t started where they should have started – with crime scene reconstruction.


MWHAHAHAHAHAH

So the untrained, unqualified, housewife turned crime gossip knows more about it than thirty officers from one of the world's oldest police forces?

I think not

And no explanation of what the 'soil probe' and metal detector was for?

Been training to be a forensic scientist by watching CSI, has she?

“If it could be proved that Gerry McCann was at the dinner table in the Tapas restaurant between 9.15 and 9.55........

That's all that needs to be said, really, as it has been proven over, and over, and over, again....best Brown sticks to gossiping about crime on blogradio, as she simply cannot cut it.

I wonder when the report of her searching the beach for the mummification site will be posted? Some of those pictures seem to suggest PDL has such a little beach that she probably thought the metal detector would find lots of bodies hidden there.

Oh, what's that you say? Its a big beach really. And metal detectors don't detect bodies? Oh dear. Well that would have made it tough to find the site then but "professional" Pat Brown would have worked day and night (when the doggies let her) to ensure she covered the whole beach wouldn't she? And she did have a spade and soil probe as well as the detector to help her. And that nice ex-policeman who was seen messing with other people's shutters proving they can't be opened by opening them.

I'm sure the report will emerge soon, once she has got over the effort of being on that gossip show last night talking about current events that she was so clear she wasn't up to speed about in that tweet. I await the beach search report with eager anticipation.

I think Myths are on the trail.....

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post65757.html#p65757

Tell me she didn't use the metal detector to try to find the non-existent fridge

Any lawyers out there? It would seem to me that the fourth paragraph "We have a situation..." contains potential serious libel.

As it appears to be a direct quote from Brown, would it be her or Natasha Donn or 123 Algarve who face any possible action? Or might it even be all three of them?

I wonder if Natasha Donn passed this article in front of the company lawyers?

I really don't know which of them may well be held responsible for that, greenink.

It is untrue and defamatory, like so much else of Brown's utterances.

MM reaction to that article:

Brilliant article by Pat!
If only we could read it in the British press!!

Oh, I think the UK press have learned, to their cost, that it really is not a good idea to publish outright lies, falsehoods and libel. So why on earth would they repeat any of that?

Brown claims she learned..

............ how the shutter and window would be impossible to open from the outside..........

D'uh?



This is ridiculous; her fan club may be unable to see what a load of nonsense this is, but the rest of the world is not so gullible.

Message for Brown:

http://regretsandramblings.com/2012/02/23/pattie-dear-they-never-fled/

Look - there is the paperwork for the rental agreement; there is the discussion with Paiva about their return to the UK.

At 4.30pm Ricardo arrived with a female colleague and the forms Gerry needed to complete. After his colleague left with the paperwork, Ricardo asked if we had any queries he could answer. ’Do you have any information for us?’ I inquried.

He clarified with us the date of our planned departure back to the UK and told us that the PJ wanted to ‘interrogate’ me on Wednesday and Gerry on Thursday. We’d waited almost four weeks for these interviews and it was obvious they had been hastily arranged once Bob Small notified the PJ that we would be leaving the country.

Gonc's spitefulness in making the McCanns arguidos, in full knowledge that:

a. Arrangements had been made for the family's return to the UK.

b. Portuguese law was only days off changing, AND WHEN IT DID, HE WOULD HAVE HAD NO GROUNDS OR REASON FOR HIS ACTION

has been well-documented and discussed elsewhere.

Suffice to say, the McCanns did NOT 'flee jurisdiction' as falsely claimed by Brown.

They would hardly have returned to Portugal so frequently if they had anything to fear, would they?

Brown really should stick to tittle-tattle and gossip about 'teenmoms' for her trailer park fanbase, though I shudder to think how much damage and pain she is responsible for in the states.

I think she means the noise the shutters would make, but since PeterMac went out of his way to make it as noisy as possible I don't think it counts.

It doesn't matter what she means, Sabot - that isn't what she said.

She has stated that it is impossible to open them from the outside, despite her sidekick having done precisely that.

They are her own words; she wrote them. And if she cannot write precisely and accurately, then she should not be writing about anything more important than flower-arranging.

Oy! Patsy!

http://regretsandramblings.com/2012/02/23/pattie-dear-gerry-was-at-the-table/

Quote:

THE PJ CONFIRMED (AS PER THE FINAL REPORT) THAT THE MAN THE SMITH FAMILY SAW WAS NOT GERRY MCCANN BECAUSE HE WAS SITTING IN THE TAPAS RESTAURANT AT THE TIME THE SMITH FAMILY SAW THIS MAN.

Sabot wrote:I think she means the noise the shutters would make, but since PeterMac went out of his way to make it as noisy as possible I don't think it counts.

Yep he certainly seemed to, but let's not forget that the sound could have been beefed up or even the sound of another shutter been substituted for the real sound. After that search light photo with all the trees butchered, sorry, but I dont trust them.

Deleted

Not important

sadie wrote:

Sabot wrote:I think she means the noise the shutters would make, but since PeterMac went out of his way to make it as noisy as possible I don't think it counts.

Yep he certainly seemed to, but let's not forget that the sound could have been beefed up or even the sound of another shutter been substituted for the real sound. After that search light photo with all the trees butchered, sorry, but I dont trust them.

I just can't see Pat Brown posting up that Video if she doesn't have something to say to poo hoo the idea that the Abductor could have got in that way. It could be the noise which was grossly exaggerated, or it could be that the shutter wouldn't stay up, but we have already proved how easily that could be accomplished.

about noise in the shutters:

I have the same shutters in my room, I can also move up and down the shutters without noise if I want.

It just goes to show you, Pedro. They are so manipulative.