BROWN FINALLY BLOGS - AND IT IS AWFUL

No, they will fall back on their old favorite - But they left them alone.

They do like wailing that, because they cannot separate their unreasoning hatred of the McCanns from the need to find Madeleine McCann.

They pretend to care about Madeleine, but they don't really. If they did, they would not make her the subject of their obscene speculations.

If they cared a jot about the child, they would realise that there is not one word they can say to, or about the McCanns, than is worse than the nightmare they have to live with every day. If they cared a jot about the child, they would know that finding her, hopefully alive and well, is more important than wailing, But they left them alone, a dozen times a day.

Yes, thank you, we all know the children were alone when Madeleine was abducted. So what happens now? No effort should be made to find her? No harsh words for the scum that abducted her?

Is beating up her parents more important to them than anything else? Because it sure looks like that is where the forkers' priorities lie.

Shame on them.

Lots of photos of lights in PDL:

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/STREET_LIGHTING.htm

And:



That was taken in October 2007.

Makes Brown look a bit of an idiot, doesn't it?

Read the "Hope" Thread on MM. That will tell you how much they want that poor child dead. They savaged Snowflake for saying she hopes Madeleine is alive. It is a sickening display.

I saw that - she got accused of being a member of Madeleine's family, didn't she?

Their lives will be ruined if and when Madeleine is found and returned to her family, the McCanns seem to have become the focus for every little bit of resentment and jealousy in their lives.

You only have to look at the revolting 'theories' they invent to see there is something wrong with them.

Deleted

I can't begin to imagine what they will do if Madeleine is found alive and well, but they will be incandescent with rage, that I do know.

Ah, is that where it came from? I just got it from google. How stupid can Brown get, though, having whoever Jane Tanner saw crossing the beach road

ETA, think we are at cross purposes, Maggs, that's an old photo I dug out; Brown's are all taken in the dark to show how light it is.

It may be light now, but it sure wasn't then.

bb1 wrote:No, they will fall back on their old favorite - But they left them alone.

They do like wailing that, because they cannot separate their unreasoning hatred of the McCanns from the need to find Madeleine McCann.

They pretend to care about Madeleine, but they don't really. If they did, they would not make her the subject of their obscene speculations.

If they cared a jot about the child, they would realise that there is not one word they can say to, or about the McCanns, than is worse than the nightmare they have to live with every day. If they cared a jot about the child, they would know that finding her, hopefully alive and well, is more important than wailing, But they left them alone, a dozen times a day.

Yes, thank you, we all know the children were alone when Madeleine was abducted. So what happens now? No effort should be made to find her? No harsh words for the scum that abducted her?

Is beating up her parents more important to them than anything else? Because it sure looks like that is where the forkers' priorities lie.

Shame on them.

Do you remember the old "If I left my car running with the keys in the ignition and it got stolen whose stupid fault would it be?" scenario? It's been cold, icy, how else could I get to work but run the car on the drive while I fed and dressed the kids? Whose fault would it be if a scumbag stole my car?

Logic is with them, humanity aint!

Oh look, from the exact same balcony as Brown,$

Brown sez:

A Picture Worth a Thousand Words



No, only five, actually

BROWN, YOU ARE AN IDIOT


jean-luc laffineur @johnjll Close
@ProfilerPatB Sorry, but this photograph is totally deceptive, Pat. On the 3rd of May 07, this was the real situation. img1.imagilive.com/0212/View_of_A…

And now an overview from GE, so that you can see where Pat Brown took some of her photos from. She was positioned slightly off the image, more or less above the "C" of "Front Car Park"



Thanks to Tony for all his hard work in helping me produce this GE image. It was produced for another purpose but it shows most of what is needed

The second photograph from this position shows the appartments across the north south road that bundleman crossed. Appartments car park are under the word door (in pale blue). From Jane Tanners observations, we know that Bundleman did NOT enter the car park there. There was no other entrance to that car park, so he walked east past that apartment block towards, but not necessarily to, Robert Murats villa.

That's very clear, Sadie - what a mess Brown has made of this!

More from that person Myths have been following:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/topic2024-600.html


jean-luc laffineur @johnjll Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
@ProfilerPatB This photograph is maybe more explicit, Pat. This flat was a perfect mousetrap, actually ! i40.servimg.com/u/f40/12/00/06…




Brown really should go home now, and hopefully LEARN something from this debacle.

She's a God Damned embarrassment, is what she is!

I cannot believe what a fool she has made of herself already, Tony - if she had bothered to even LOOK AT THE PICTURES in the police files, she wouldn't have come out with that load of utter rubbish.

And as for inventing 'fictional scenarios' - very professional, not.

What she has succeeded in doing is proving all over again how simple it would have been to abduct a child from 5a, which I don't think was the object of the exercise...

bb1 wrote:I cannot believe what a fool she has made of herself already, Tony - if she had bothered to even LOOK AT THE PICTURES in the police files, she wouldn't have come out with that load of utter rubbish.

And as for inventing 'fictional scenarios' - very professional, not.

What she has succeeded in doing is proving all over again how simple it would have been to abduct a child from 5a, which I don't think was the object of the exercise...

She is also making a fool of the PJ. In fact, she is doing a better job than any UK media could ever do.

Maggs wrote:Oh look, from the exact same balcony as Brown,$

Hmm . Are you sure?

Looks to me like it is taken from the Apartment block shown in the second Pat Brown PdL photo. The block that on the GE image is under the pale blue lettering, saying "door" (from "Front door")

Pat Brown has managed to confuse us all. She talks about the back of 5A when she means the front and gets it all wrong. She insists that the abductor went in via the patio doors, despite the fact that Amaral himself is on record as saying that no abductor would risk it when so close to the parents ... and at that stage he admitted that the patio was only 50 metres away from the parents. [That was when he was trying to prove that Madeleine must have died in 5A]

I have only read the first couple of paragraphs yet!

Jeez, so many errors. Makes you wonder, "Is she cahoots with others over there". Was it all typed up by different peeps for weeks before? Then all that time in Lisboa spent splicing the tale together?. Surely not. Surely such a good investigator as Pat Brown would be above board? After all she is on TV , isn't she?

It was the business of her 'discovering' the apartment block facing 5a that floored me, Tony. If she had bothered to read the files, she would know there were statements from people staying there.

Now, I know Gonc was bad, but even he noticed there was a damn great block of flats on the other side of the road.

Prat Brown has managed to confuse us all

I sat with pages of photos open to try to make sense of her post, and then realised there is no sense to be made.

It's nonsensical rubbish from start to finish.

If she wishes to make an ass of herself Bonny, who are we to stop her?
I am just going to sit back and watch her comedy show.

crazytony wrote:She's a God Damned embarrassment, is what she is!

I agree. Being American, she's looking like a complete jack-ass to the rest of the world. She couldn't even do the basic reading of the files and her pictures are woefully wrong. This is someone that's supposed to be a "professional". I would say she's a professional bs'er.

Oh, I can't wait for tomorrow, she is going to tell us what route the abductor should have taken.

I cannot get my head around the mess she made today. By her reasoning, 9/11 couldn't have happened because there are no pictures of those tall buildings in current photos of New York.

And she clearly didn't take a minute to look at the PJ photos in the files.

Zenny wrote:

crazytony wrote:She's a God Damned embarrassment, is what she is!

I agree. Being American, she's looking like a complete jack-ass to the rest of the world. She couldn't even do the basic reading of the files and her pictures are woefully wrong. This is someone that's supposed to be a "professional". I would say she's a professional bs'er.

Zenny, you and I both know, she cannot spell the word professional without a spell checker; never mind know how act it.

You know she's going to say that The Abductor should or would have taken Madeleine down that Main Road because it's easier. Probably the only road in the whole of PdL that was actually properly lighted with nowhere to hide and at least some traffic.

Oh dear! I gather someone was rather norty....

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post62828.html#p62828





And after Brown had taken that as confirmation that 'pattyodor' was the real deal, and the lighting in 2007 was the same as in 2012, the 'pattyodor' account was deleted.

You wouldn't expect an Awesome, hotshot 'profiler' to walk into a trap like that. Dayle Hinman certainly wouldn't