BENNETT CLUTCHES AT LEGAL AID STRAWS

Don't really know, LL. But I think it has gone a bit beyond accusing The McCanns. Although Mr. Bennett seems to have missed this point.. He still thinks that he has a right to accuse them, despite having absolutely no proof. But he is now calling on his right to an Opinion, no matter what.

I think that he should have this right. I think that he should have the right to call The McCanns into Court to answer his spurious questions, but always with regard to The Law. And there is no Law that says that The McCanns have to answer the questions of anyone. But I do think that Mr, Bennett should pay for this.

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:This business of him playing the victim disgusts me, Lily.

He's gone out of his way to hurt Madeleine McCann and her family, he's smeared innocent people, he has made up disgusting lies about people, he has stalking and harrassed, well, anyone he felt like...

AND HE'S THE VICTIM?

I think not.

The Victim?

He can't take responsibility. He will never grow up to be a mature man, will he?

It's not actually like that, Lily

I wonder which of his personas Bennett is going to grace the High Court as?

Seamus McGuigan of the Real-Hounders? Timothy Trevelyan, the gay Cornish hairdresser? Ray Stevens, the roadsign thief? Or maybe his feminine side will be to the fore as Barbara Nottage?

Yes. i don't actually always explain myself very well but then I often don't because I don't actually have to, any more than The McCanns have to. I don't have to explain to these Cretins for any reason whatsoever. There is nothing to say. Why would I want to debate with them when there is nothing to debate?

That's the heart of the matter, isn't it, Sabot? What is there to 'debate'? They've had FOUR YEARS to read and understand the police files, and still haven't bothered, preferring instead to believe forum myths and all the lies that cost the tabloids so much money.

Oh, and what their hairdresser's neice's neighbour's fiance says. And what WUMs on police dating sites say.

That's all the excuse they need to happily join in their internet lynch mobs.

Who can be bothered 'debating' with the likes of them?

You know, there is one thing I really, really hope haunts Bennett when he is finally forced to attend the High Court. And that is his sadistic taunting of Lee Balkwell's widow.

That was wicked. No real Christian could have behaved like that, enjoying sneering at a grieving woman.

Yes, well, I was never going to get my head around that one. I don't even know what to call him because he is beyond my comprehension. Nothing ever to do with me.

That was wicked. No real Christian could have behaved like that, enjoying sneering at a grieving woman.

This goes to show how weak Bennett has to be on the inside if it takes this to show this to the outside world in order to make him feel powerful.