Bennett playing stupid games with Carter Ruck

bb1 wrote:Wonder if he will work out the difference between a pursuer and a defendant before he's in the dock? I do hope not.

He already knows the difference, Bonny. He just thinks that we don't. Mr. Bennett is basing his whole campaign on what he sees as the ignorance of the common people. But The Judges at The Court of Human Rights are stupid either.

Because the Hounders have no clue about what goes on in the court, Bennett is feeding off that. He is convincing them that the McCanns have to be there, they don't.

Bennett is on trial here, not the McCanns...The evidence comes from Bennett himself and what he has been doing all this time. He could have saved himself money by stopping it all..

When the Hounders actually learn to read for themselves and the whole bits of evidence, not the snippets they get, then they may just realise.

They never will realise, MF, because they don't want to, although I don't know why this is.
But there is nothing mysterious about it all. A nasty little man seeking fame and glory, picked on another victim in extremity without a thought for the misery he might cause. I can only assume that the people who aid him are sad shadows of what he is.
The Law is also not mysterious. You just need access to a small amount of logic to understand the process. To listen and to hear. And then all is explained.

Nice of Bennett to confirm the source of his muckraking is the Lizards.

Yoyo's latest gem:

Far as I know, it was the Mccanns' idea to make Maddie 'Ward of Court' so that they could lay their hands on info which otherwise was refused to them by LP.

Which demonstrates yet again how little it knows.

No, Madeleine was made a WOC in 2007 because that meant she was under Crown protection, wherever she was found in the world, and would be put on the first BA flight back to the UK by the local embassy.

That morons like Gonc and the haters still cannot grasp something so simple is their problem, and no-one else's.

That is why Bennett drops things like 'pursuer' into the posts.

He is manipulating in his favor what he wants his unquestioning sheep to think. It does make it seem like he is the one with the law on his side, doesn't it?

Except we know different.

The 'pursuer' business came about because someone used it in a post - it's a Scots legal term. Bennett demonstrated his usual stunning ignorance by thinking it meant 'defender' - ie, him.

Did he really? Oh my, I was reading too quickly all those posts I've been hoping to catch up on. I thought he was being his usual sneaky manipulative self and attempting to fool his followers.

More dissent:

aiyoyo. Are you condoning the attempt to get Gerry McCann struck off the medical register then? Tony Bennett has been given sound legal advice from forum peeps and also professionals (Kirwans, Liverpool) yet he has continued.



It might just be that the McCanns are pissed off about the leaflet campaign, the nasty letters to the GMC, the attempted prosecution neglect ... and have decided to take action.



Tony Bennett is not doing this forum any favours.

Oh dear. This, from the dissenter, on MM:

Re: Tony Bennett - court case CONFIRMED
ShabbyTiger Today

I've just been banned from the Jill Havern forum for challenging the Rothley leaflet drop and the nasty letter to the GMC as a bridge too far.

Seems like there is no freedom of speech on the Jill Havern board. So why are they promoting Tony Bennett as some kind of free speech champion?

It's Free Speach But Only For Them, is why.

Bet the bannee's name stays on the memberlist with all the other hundreds and hundreds who have been banned, though. The hounders can't even tell the truth about how few members they really have.

Oh my.....

This has been appearing on twitter with various captions about what Bennett needs....

Well I think that we know what he needs, but is that on Twitter?

lily wrote:Well I think that we know what he needs, but is that on Twitter?

Is this what you want, Lily?

How did you guess, Sabot?

http://exposingthemyths.blogspot.co.uk/2013/01/calling-all-anti-mccanns-mr-bennett.html?m=1



It's simpler than that, actually. Bennett claims his home roost has.....

2092 loyal members.

All his problems would be solved with a tenner from each of them, wouldn't it?

But we all know why that isn't going to happen, don't we? It's because 90% of them are banned for 'disruption' or are socks. The post rate tells its own story - there are only some 200 GENUINE members on that site, and the number of active members struggles to reach a tenth of that.

Proof:

Bennett's home site:

Our users have posted a total of 108893 messages
We have 2092 registered users

And it's been in existence for nearly four years.

Myths:

Total members 91

Total posts 138057

And it's been in existence for three years. Yet there are 30,000 more posts on Myths.

Stats speak for themselves as to the number of REAL members on CMOMM.

On the subject of banned dissenters, we have this gem from 'admin':


Why do some people go running off to various forums bleating about freedom of speech when they know Tony is facing prison and Carter Ruck are breathing down our necks?

Oh, the irony! Remind me, what is it Bennett is bleating about? Oh yes, Free Speach.

Free Speach but only for them. They wouldn't understand Free Speech if it smacked them in the gob. This is why most ordinary people don't actually have a need for Free Speech.

Is this Brian Kennedy's son Patrick seen following him in Praia da Luz?
sharonl Today at 8:24 pm

A 2008 video which has a bloke walking down the street in Praia da Luz (or Portimao?) hiding his face with maps (early on in the video) and then right at the end of this 1 min 36 sec video we see Brian Kennedy, followed by his son, Patrick?

Do they never, ever, stop stalking people?

It's surfaced, finally.

Anthony Bennett ‏@zampos
@Bishop_Basher Is there evidence #McCann s have caved in? But no doubt judge in McCanns v Benentt will want update on Portuguese libel case

1. There is 'no evidence' because they haven't - smiffy and Morais, two of the biggest fibbers on the internet, demanding people believe them, is not evidence.

2. Straw-clutching, are we? What has the state of play in Portugal got to do with contempt of court in the UK?

Sounds like he needs to borrow Creepy Gonc's white flag.

Even Bennett knows that The McCanns haven't caved in.

And why would a British Judge be interested in a Portuguese Libel Case?

"But Yer Honour, I only said it because he said it." and "Can we wait six months to see what they say?"

I bet he tries something like that, Sabot. My own opinion is that we may never know the exact terms Gonc settles for - but surely even his deluded worshippers must have noticed the deepening silence from him?

Does this look like a man with anything to celebrate?

We probably won't know the terms, Bonny. But The Lisbon Court will give some indication of what motivated it.

And then there is always The Accounts next year.

He is sitting staring straight ahead and not interacting with the people around him.

Look at the man (to our left) pulling away from him. The woman looks disgusted.

Oh and the man to Gonc's left......just look at his fingers.

This body language stuff is fun, isn't it?