Thought the Hounders liked Free Speach?

So, from only a handful of insomniac, obsessive haters seeing it, it is now on the internet forever more, thanks to Bennett's 'friends'.

It was kind of our Tony to black his face out, though the result is rather remininscent of the Zodiac Killer.....

One good thing - this incident might disabuse the hounders and forkers of the bizarre notion that the press just can't wait to publish material about the McCanns.

Though there is a group of people the press have bulging 'dossiers' on. Here's a hint to the hounders and forkers - take a look in the mirror if you want to see who it is.

The Butler Done It on FaceBook is desperately trying to talk her way out of it on Twitter. Threats of Slander. We never done Slandered Bennett. They done that.

Methinks they still don't understand Google Bots. Doncha just love The Bots.

http://www.annaraccoon.com/madeleine-mccann/the-star-of-the-libel-courts/

:

Hilarious!

deborah butler ‏@IWILLNOTGOAWAY
@Colin54637641 @AnnaEsse @warlen7 @zampos that does not make sense at all - its on sky and twitter !!! fgs #mccann

1. So, how many people were obsessively watching Sky News late night paper review, two inches from the screen so they could identify the pics? Damned few, I should think.

2. The only reason is on Twitter - is that she and her fellow haters put it there.

If they had used a bit of common sense, no-one would ever have seen it.

kim ‏@zante03
so, when one googles tony bennett and cyril smith a page of pitchforking sites appears. silly peeps spreading pic like that round.

Yup, I just tried it. That's exactly what happens.

You really have to hand it to the forkers and hounders, they have succeeded in getting Bennett google-bound to Cyril Smith.

I like that phrase google-bound

so I've just tweeted it incase they forget what they have done

deborah butler ‏@IWILLNOTGOAWAY
kim ‏@zante03 thick thick thick. daily star printed tony bennetts picture against story of cyril smith - their fault their mess SUE #mccann

No, the Star very quickly corrected their mistake. Butler and co then spread it everywhere.

Their fault, their mess.

Now, do they really think the Dear Leader is going to thank them for that?

Now I am left in no doubt whatsoever that Bennett knew how simple his hounders were when he had to tell them about how to behave re: toilets and the Court.

He left them alone, and this is what they got up to.

Just how delusional are these people?

MOM OF TWO ‏@GILLYSPOT
@julygirl3210 I have a screenshot too. Daily Star are shown to be #trolls IMO that is unless THEY apologise & donate to TB's costs #McCann

Why on earth should the Star give Bennett money for a mistake, quickly rectified?

Why can't they grasp that it is THEM who have spread it everywhere and exposed Bennett to such ridicule?

Hasn't it even dawned on them that Bennett wasn't named? The few people who actually saw it will have thought, Who on earth is that? I thought Cyril Smith was fat?

THEY are the ones who have spread it, seemingly unaware of the fact that the busy little bots have been hoovering it up for posterity.

I thought this was the funniest thing that has happened in the whole time I've been following this case. For Bennett's photo to have been used like that is the sweetest karma going.

And now to see his own supposed friends and followers making sure that his name is forever linked with a story about sex rings and paedophiles is even funnier.

The two funniest moments for me in what is such a sad case. And Bennett is the butt of the joke and his morons cannot even see what they are doing.

You think they can't get any worse, and then they do. But they won't half have to go some to beat this one.
However, I seem to remember saying that before.

Re: Somebody had better explain this!
Not Born Yesterday Today at 10:21 am

Would it be possible for someone with hacking skills - but with no connection to the Daily Star - to switch the photos?

If it is possible, we won't need to look far for the number one suspect.



Paranoid loony.

Where's muratfan? YesterdayJeanTroll thinks he's been hacking the Star website.

When is it going to dawn on these lunatics that it was a quickly-rectified mistake, that Bennett wasn't named, and that it's THEM who have turned him into a laughing stock?

Re: SUE their butts off TONY!
Jean Today
Okay, it was just a possibility. There certainly are some McCann trolls stupid enough not to realise what the consequences of such an action might be though.
--------

Someone around here's stupid, and I think we can all see who it is.

They are increasingly nicking our "lines" and our "grammar" in some failed attempt to redress their abysmal lack of ideas and imagination.
But this is just more proof of how much time they spend reading JATYK.

Sabot, I can see why Bennett had to tell them to wash and behave, and how to go to the toilet.

Judging by their use of Lavatory Emoticoms, and their knowledge of Immodium their toilet habits are obviously vastly different from the rest of the human race, so no wonder they needed telling.

Very true, Sabot - I did see pretendypete post a 'hilarious' pic of faeces a few days ago.

They do all seem obsessed with toilets and Immodium; I'd rather not think about what says about them and their 'issues'.

Oh dear...

e: SUE their butts off TONY!
jeanmonroe Today
Think you're right!
Maybe she phoned The Star to make sure there was no 'paper trail'
IF it is THE Ms Butler WHY would she be so concerned and spend time phoning the paper?
Leopards? Spots?
With 'friends' like that, who needs....etc.


Re: SUE their butts off TONY!
ShuBob Today

I'm not at all liking the change of direction on this thread . I also think the screenshot of the Star article should be deleted.

There is absolutely NO point in deleting it. It's been saved, repeated, reposted EVERYWHERE.

Now, if Butler and co hadn't made such a fuss about it, most of us would never have seen it. Discretion sometimes is a very good idea..

Members List
hippywippywoo Today
I am a bit confused.

If C.Edwards was banned why is he/she still listed on the members list as a member?

Doesn't he/she automatically get removed from the list or is the number of members wrong?

That list of members is about as genuine as a frozen Findus lasagne. If all the banned members and socks were removed, the truth would be revealed - that there are only a couple of hundred of them, and even less active members.

e: SUE their butts off TONY!
jeanmonroe Today at 5:40 pm

bristow wrote:
Best to get it removed asap as Google bots will pick it up and it will be on the interweb for eternity.


won't take a defamation trial judge too long to find it then!

Yes, and ask who spread it all over the internet, when the Star removed it as soon as the paper realised its mistake.

Blame Butler and co, they're the ones who have immortalised it.