Bennett already going back on promise he made on BBC Television

Pity it never occurs to the Troofseekers to do some actual truth-seeking, instead of basing everything on regurgitated media stories.

No wonder they never get anything right.

It's ironic, actually, the way Bennett squeals if the press gets the least little thing wrong in some story about him. Does it never, ever occur to them that media stories about the McCanns are equally wrong?

Hence the media have had to pay out so much money to the McCanns, Murat and others?

It doesn't matter what Bennett thinks he has the right to say or do in regards to the McCann case. The Portuguese Attorney General's final report nullifies all that came before his ruling.

What I would like to see is Enid O'Dowd's forensic accounting report. I simply do not believe that The McCanns would be so stupid as to have done anything criminal with the money, none of which has been public funds anyway. Donations are not Public Funds, and nor are the profits from Kate's book, or the Damages from newspapers.
So Enid O'Dowd's comments can only be a mish mash of her opinion of what The McCanns should have done.

crazytony wrote:It doesn't matter what Bennett thinks he has the right to say or do in regards to the McCann case. The Portuguese Attorney General's final report nullifies all that came before his ruling.

Bennett leaving out that Report was a colossal clanger, Tony. That was done with intention to deceive.

Sabot wrote:

crazytony wrote:It doesn't matter what Bennett thinks he has the right to say or do in regards to the McCann case. The Portuguese Attorney General's final report nullifies all that came before his ruling.

Bennett leaving out that Report was a colossal clanger, Tony. That was done with intention to deceive.

And that will be his downfall Sabot.

Sabot wrote:

crazytony wrote:It doesn't matter what Bennett thinks he has the right to say or do in regards to the McCann case. The Portuguese Attorney General's final report nullifies all that came before his ruling.

Bennett leaving out that Report was a colossal clanger, Tony. That was done with intention to deceive.

Absolutely so, Sabot. Since we know that, Judge Tugendhat must know that too.

Have you read Ena O' Forker's much-vaunted 'forensic accounting reports'? They're so bigoted and pointless, they are a comedy genre of their own - pitchforking by numbers.

They're no more proper 'forensic accounting reports' than I'm an astronaut - she waves her pitchfork at every opportunity.

No genuine forensic accountant would make remarks like:

It's surely very strange that someone updating a LinkedIn page in December 2012 could make an error about their current work status. While people may be creative with their CVs to hide a gap in employment for example, it's hard to explain these date discrepancies.

- O' Forker continually attacks a woman by the name of McCalman.

After my report was published on www.mccannfiles.com several people contacted the website suggesting that the Fund Administrator might be Ms Karen McCalman.

What she means is, the 8rs did rather a lot of googlestalking and concocted a Hypothesis to suit their bigotry.

She ends the whole diatribe with:

Transparent is not a word I would use to describe the 2012 accounts.

Yes, well, who cares what she thinks? By even venturing an opinion - never mind posting her opinion all the way through the pretendy 'forensic accounting report' she does what NO professional would ever do.

It's the usual bullsh*t, in other words, of no legal value whatsoever. It's full of big words and important-sounding phrases, though, so just the kind of bullsh*t that impresses the none-too-bright 8rs.

It's still just pitchforking by numbers.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id429.html

That is a professional audit?

Totally as an aside, have you noticed how many of them are doing things like this after their posts, or names

Enid O'Dowd 29 January 2013

The Complete Mystery of Madeleine McCann TM

Rothley Pillow TM and others?

Yes, pretentious, isn't it? And deluded.

lily wrote:

Sabot wrote:

crazytony wrote:It doesn't matter what Bennett thinks he has the right to say or do in regards to the McCann case. The Portuguese Attorney General's final report nullifies all that came before his ruling.

Bennett leaving out that Report was a colossal clanger, Tony. That was done with intention to deceive.

Absolutely so, Sabot. Since we know that, Judge Tugendhat must know that too.

He could hardly have missed it, could he. Or perhaps Bennett thought that he wouldn't know about it. That was actually a massive insult to the intelligence of Judge Tugendhat.

Sabot wrote:

lily wrote:

Sabot wrote:

crazytony wrote:It doesn't matter what Bennett thinks he has the right to say or do in regards to the McCann case. The Portuguese Attorney General's final report nullifies all that came before his ruling.

Bennett leaving out that Report was a colossal clanger, Tony. That was done with intention to deceive.

Absolutely so, Sabot. Since we know that, Judge Tugendhat must know that too.

He could hardly have missed it, could he. Or perhaps Bennett thought that he wouldn't know about it. That was actually a massive insult to the intelligence of Judge Tugendhat.

All I can say about your last sentence, Sabot, is "Oh dear".....

bb1 wrote:Yes, pretentious, isn't it? And deluded.

I'll say, Bonny. They needn't worry. It's not as though they are the equivalent of JK Rowling, or Tolstoy or James Cameron (for Ho Ho ).

bb1 wrote:Have you read Ena O' Forker's much-vaunted 'forensic accounting reports'? They're so bigoted and pointless, they are a comedy genre of their own - pitchforking by numbers.

They're no more proper 'forensic accounting reports' than I'm an astronaut - she waves her pitchfork at every opportunity.

No genuine forensic accountant would make remarks like:

It's surely very strange that someone updating a LinkedIn page in December 2012 could make an error about their current work status. While people may be creative with their CVs to hide a gap in employment for example, it's hard to explain these date discrepancies.

- O' Forker continually attacks a woman by the name of McCalman.

After my report was published on www.mccannfiles.com several people contacted the website suggesting that the Fund Administrator might be Ms Karen McCalman.

What she means is, the 8rs did rather a lot of googlestalking and concocted a Hypothesis to suit their bigotry.

She ends the whole diatribe with:

Transparent is not a word I would use to describe the 2012 accounts.

Yes, well, who cares what she thinks? By even venturing an opinion - never mind posting her opinion all the way through the pretendy 'forensic accounting report' she does what NO professional would ever do.

It's the usual bullsh*t, in other words, of no legal value whatsoever. It's full of big words and important-sounding phrases, though, so just the kind of bullsh*t that impresses the none-too-bright 8rs.

It's still just pitchforking by numbers.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id429.html

So I was right then. It's just her PitchForking Opinion. The Judge will have loved that. And so will I, especially if Bennett tries to produce it as evidence of wrongdoing on the part of The McCanns.

Down hill without a brake, springs to mind. with a bloody great chasm at the bottom.

Down hill without a brake, springs to mind. with a bloody great chasm at the bottom.

It's times like these when Bonny posts the photo of the train wreck?

6RB isn't half showing them up as a bunch of ignoramuses.


Colin ‏@Colin54637641
@OlwynMassey He or she won't last long, however much knowledge they have. Absolutely no chance of TB listening either #mccann

Nope, can't be long before they get banned for daring to tell the truth.

ShuBob Today
After nearly six years of following this case, I find out today that it was the PJ who started the "Coloboma campaign". A CAMPAIGN no less!

You learn something new everyday

She must have been reading very selectively, or she would have known long ago that it was the PJ who started it.

Just as the 'egg' photofit was the PJ's doing - it's all a matter of legal record. So why do the 8rs keep twisting the truth? Twisting isn't going to help Bennett one bit in court.

e: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Jean Today
Who would have thought that those sardine-munchers would even have known what a coloboma was!!!

That's no way to talk about Gonc.....

bb1 wrote:e: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Jean Today
Who would have thought that those sardine-munchers would even have known what a coloboma was!!!

That's no way to talk about Gonc.....

She must be about due to call 6RB a TROLL!!!! and demand he be banned for daring to point out a few inconvenient truths to them.

I can hardly believe what I have just read in that Forensic Accounting Report. Sheesh, I could have done better than that if I wanted to publish a pile of shite. There is not one provable discrepancy in it. Exactly the opposite, I would say. Pure waffle.
Silly bitch. Miss Page would make a right fool of her. But then so could I.

bb1 wrote:She must be about due to call 6RB a TROLL!!!! and demand he be banned for daring to point out a few inconvenient truths to them.

So far, the Super Duper Moderator has suggested that 6RB stop being so pompous.

Sabot wrote:
I can hardly believe what I have just read in that Forensic Accounting Report. Sheesh, I could have done better than that if I wanted to publish a pile of shite. There is not one provable discrepancy in it. Exactly the opposite, I would say. Pure waffle.
Silly bitch. Miss Page would make a right fool of her. But then so could I.

Sabot, I am of the opinion that that is why Judge Tugendhat specifically said he had taken the trouble to read it.
Who says that unless they feel negatively about something?

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:She must be about due to call 6RB a TROLL!!!! and demand he be banned for daring to point out a few inconvenient truths to them.

So far, the Super Duper Moderator has suggested that 6RB stop being so pompous.

So Truth is Pompous now, is it? Silly old Judge. That's him done and dusted. Bennett Rules, Okay.

I am sure Judge T. is used to reading professional reports; what he was thinking when he read that pile of poo I do not know.

Anyone with half a brain cell can see it is valueless, legally.

Isn't it hilarious, Sabot? Yet they claim they aren't a cult.

So Truth is Pompous now, is it? Silly old Judge. That's him done and dusted. Bennett Rules, Okay.

On Hellhole? Always has.. always will. No wonder he gets called a cult leader.