Feverish excitement in haterland over new conspiraloonacy

He does sound like a typical Amoral supporting no class idiot.  

This is from Myths too and in response to a request.......

Re: Hello Numptiz. Everyboddy iz laughin at youz.
Posted by Jayelles » Sun Aug 10, 2014 10:31 am



IsabelleMcFadden ‏@PORTUGALONLINE · 9 hrs
#mccann Driving and tweeting


 Huntington Beach, CA
Expand


I take it this is not yet illegal in California?

Only someone who would brag online about preferring a "sweet line of coke" to marijuana would brag about carrying out her online social networking activities whilst driving.

Hope it doesn't all end badly for her. There have been two cases in the news recently about young women who met their makers whilst FBing behind the wheel.

It is definitely illegal in California to do that while driving and I hope she gets caught before she causes injury to innocent people on the road.  

If she does really hurt or kill someone while doing that, she will be put in jail.  She would also be the subject of a large law suit.   The admission about her drug preference could be brought up by the prosecution too.

Clearly her addictive tendencies for substances is also showing in her addiction to other risky behavior.   Way to go McFadden!  Selfish jerk.

And I just remembered where I'd seen something about it in the US, Lily:

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/02/04/Shepard-Smith-Tweeting-And-Facebook-Messaging-Inebriated-Worse-Than-Driving-Drunk

SHEPARD SMITH: TWEETING AND FACEBOOK MESSAGING INEBRIATED WORSE THAN DRIVING DRUNK

Even more dangerous if you're stoned out of the few brains you possess, one would imagine...

Thanks Bonny.

DRIVING DRUNK: gonçalo amaral once did it.

I knew I'd seen something about it, somewhere, Lily, but as I'm never likely to be tweeting whilst driving in the States, I hadn't paid too much attention at the time...

I bet she's the kind who puts her makeup on while driving too.   

Bonny, I honestly believe that when driving then all of your attention should be on that alone. It's too important. Obviously McFadden doesn't think of consequences. She is an air head......

An over-the-hill bimbo that's taken one illegal chemical too many, judging from the garbage she spouts.

bb1 wrote:An over-the-hill bimbo that's taken one illegal chemical too many, judging from the garbage she spouts.

You nailed it.

haterland:

http://www.tarynhough.com/pictures/crazy%20gremlin.gif

More nonsense from the conspiraloon - as if this matter needed any more conspiraloon nutjobs:

http://www.richplanet.net/letters/MP023.php

I wonder if these whackjobs ever grasp how offensive they are to the victims of these terrorist attacks, when they turn the real deaths of real people into some kind of Cluedo for nutters?

Beams from space my backside.   

Fantastic isn't it.

But of course Angelo can see nowt wrong with it all.

Is this garbage from a numty typical of the contents of the DVD?

Can anyone tell me why Marcos Aragao Correia acted for the McCanns in criminal proceedings brought by Leanor against Dr Amaral? Its within the video's and I'm finding it very strange that the McCs would need to be acted for in a case that has nothing to do with them?


Probably because he didn't. Correia has NEVER represented the McCanns in any way, despite the lurid stories in the O Crime rag (curiously, also represented by Gonzo's last ex-lawyer).

That's an outright falsehood, and can only have come from one of the Gonzo-worshipping fangirlz.

JoleneJolene ‏@JoleneCSC 3h
@LHLNews Thankyou. Theres so much evidence out there to show what really happened but it's being heavily covered up - so frustrating.#mccann

Joseph O'Driscoll ‏@Josephodriscoll 3m
@JoleneCSC @LHLNews If it's "out there" how's the evidence being "covered up", Dimbo?

          

bb1 wrote:JoleneJolene ‏@JoleneCSC  3h
@LHLNews Thankyou. Theres so much evidence out there to show what really happened but it's being heavily covered up - so frustrating.#mccann

Joseph O'Driscoll ‏@Josephodriscoll  3m
@JoleneCSC @LHLNews If it's "out there" how's the evidence being "covered up", Dimbo?

          

Perfect   

I am seeing extracts from those DVDs being quoted all over the place, Jean-Pierre. And if the quotes are anything to go by, they're a load of p*sh, little more than Bennett's Eleventy-Nine Reasons in a digital format.

I have waded though a couple of them and they really are every bit as bad as you can imagine - think Bennett and hidehos dim offspring, with droning N. midlands whine.

Looking at his other "work" he owes a lot to Bennett -

"If you disagree with my conclusions, based on very selective reading of gossip and conspiraloon ramblings, then you must be in denial. "

A true revelation....

        

Ouch!          

Fascinating finds by Myths:

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/insights-into-the-personalities-conspiracy-theorists/?page=2

http://www.open.edu/openlearn/body-mind/psychology/psychological-studies/the-psychology-conspiracy-theories

Interesting comment on first link:

So are conspiracy theorists afflicted with a psychoses like paranoia or is it a personality flaw? Can we prevent conspiracy thinking with education or is it hardwired? Is there a way to approach a delusional person and present them with information that will help break them out of this type of thinking or are they lost causes? Sciam could contribute a great deal to this study as its comment section is plagued by conspiracy theorists of one type or other. The tend to rehash the same lines over and over even when presented evidence to the contrary, which is why I wonder if they can be reformed. I believe we need to add logic and critical thought to our school curriculum but wounder if that will be enough.

Some loony on Bushmeat's blog, of the Truthseeking DVDs.

one thing Rich D Hall's video will do is bring a circle of 9/11 truthers to the Mccann case and I think that will have some benefits.

'Benefits' isn't quite the word most people would use of association with those obsessive nutjobs.....

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/a-witness-in-active-criminal-case.html

Quote:

Surely this would challenge the credibility of the evidence the Irishman gave.....?

It sure would, Bennett in particular is already taking an interest in the 'Smith sighting', at great - indeed, interminal length.

Seconded.   

PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB 7 hrs
My final post on the Madeleine McCann case.#McCann http://patbrownprofiling.blogspot.com/2014/08/my-final-post-on-madeleine-mccann-case.html …

Thank fck for that.  

It echoes what was felt over at Fox after she was er.....let go.   

For nearly all "anti", the Maddie case is The case of their life. For Pat Brown, who is a profiler, it's a case among the numerous ones she deals with in her professional life and she devoted a lot of time and energy ( unpaid) to "our" case. She has not the same approach and her attitude is normal.

And that is exactly why they are such pathetic, deluded obsessives.