'Torrent of hate for new Madeleine book'

bb1 wrote:http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.co.uk/2014/09/looking-for-madeleine-bookit-has-arrived.html

Tony spots a couple of the reasons the haters are screeching at S&S.

Great post Tony.   Have they ever got anything right?

Lord spare us, the hounders are still having one of those tedious 'debates' about what it means if the Daily Bugle said Blah Blah and the Daily Trumpet said Bleh Bleh, which one of them is lying?

They've been doing this for SEVEN YEARS now. They've never once got anything right, and there's no sign of that changing...

Believe it or not, some of the hounders are so THICK they can't tell a genuine interview from some tedious, pretentious sh*te written by Bennett, and are so OUTRAGED by the garbage they are posting things like:

Re: Summers and Swan reply to criticisms of their book - and explain the David Payne/Kate McCann 6.30pm visit contradictions
Post The Rooster Yesterday at 10:31 pm

Are these two for real? They come across as very unprofessional.


No wonder they couldn't Research their way out of a paper bag.

Another one rants:

Re: Summers and Swan reply to criticisms of their book - and explain the David Payne/Kate McCann 6.30pm visit contradictions
Post TMH Yesterday at 10:33 pm

Hmm so it's ok that mistakes were made in the statements then is it? Everyone is to blame for these mistakes except for the Tapas lot? Try telling that to the Police when crims give their statements "tsk".

And who cares if they ban people from their FB page? Who do they think they are? They're nobody as far as I'm concerned, just two bit "authors" who have written an untrue, rubbish book! But there you go JMO

Imbeciles.

You can definitely judge the quality of that site by looking at the posts.   

It rather demonstrates that their shoe size is greater than their age, that they actually thought that carp like this, written in pure Bennettese, was actually said by S&S:

To prove just how ludicrous the haters’ allegations of contradictions are, we will now tackle the spurious claims made by one of the most notorious haters, one Anthony Bennett. In one of his latest fabled ‘lists’, he sets out what he claims are 20 separate inconsistencies about a visit that was made by Dr David Payne’s visit to the McCanns’ apartment at around 6.30pm on the day Madeleine was reported missing.


Complete and utter morons.

Meanwhile, 'ex-policeman' Dirtymac has invented a whole new conspiracy theory because Gerry McCann bought sunglasses in the course of his holiday in Hell.

And there wasn't even blazing sunshine every single day.

Don't ask me what the significance of sunglass-buying is, but it seems awfully important to them.

Don't ask me what the significance of sunglass-buying is, but it seems awfully important to them.

You have got to be teasing?  This from the one who stated he is an ex-cop?

I was losing the will to live looking at the nonsense, complete with weather tables to demonstrate that sunglasses were unneccessary, and that therefore Evil Gerry didn't buy them.

I have NO idea what it was all about. Though I am curious to know when this Stalinist law was introduced that people can't buy sunglasses when they choose to - has anyone told Boots?

I do hope they send their research to the Met.   

Personally, I think this proves that many of their members must be suffering from dementia over there.

I wonder if they realise that the things they get so worked-up about - now one of them thinks Gerry's sunglasses look 'too cheap' to really be his - are completely, totally irrelevant? And the reason they get blocked by EVERYONE is that no-one can be ar@ed with them and their bigoted ignorance, and obsession with meaningless trivia?

On a happier note, I see Myths are moving into their new home:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/index.php?sid=1735e62d62732960e5a6556944b250d7

all antis are suffering from dementia, which was a vírus originated from amaral´s insane behaviour.

bb1 wrote:I wonder if they realise that the things they get so worked-up about - now one of them thinks Gerry's sunglasses look 'too cheap' to really be his - are completely, totally irrelevant? And the reason they get blocked by EVERYONE is that no-one can be ar@ed with them and their bigoted ignorance, and obsession with meaningless trivia?

On a happier note, I see Myths are moving into their new home:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/index.php?sid=1735e62d62732960e5a6556944b250d7

That's really good news.  Pleased for them.

Jealousy, more like. The book they all hate so much makes them all look like nasty fools - which they are, of course. Which is why they're reduced to reassuring each other with fake 'reviews' and fake sales figures.

And it also makes Gonzo look like a blundering fool. Which he is, of course.

Civil discussion or exchange of views will be welcomed, but those with no respect for that principle must expect their posts to be deleted. Repeat offenders will be banned. There are plenty of other places on the Net that will allow them to shout distortions of the facts and spread black propaganda.

It's astounding, really, that the thicko haters can't, or won't, understand that, and that it means THEM. 'Black propaganda' is exactly what they spew and spread everywhere they can.

Oh the poor dears.  They can do all the reassuring in the world, it still won't change the reality of what they are and as stated in the book.

They are in complete denial if they cannot accept that normal people don't have to deal with them if they don't want to.

Of course, it won't help that the book is very readable, unlike their endless, repetitive drivel and, well, black propaganda.

bb1 wrote:Of course, it won't help that the book is very readable, unlike their endless, repetitive drivel and, well, black propaganda.

That is the best word ever to describe what the black hearted ones write.

Oh Lord, now the haters and hounders are now dribbling with excitement over some p*sh from a WUM with a blog that claims it's seen 'Scotland Yard documents' about the Yard meeting S&S.

Yes, of course it has.

This notorious McCann-hater was mentioned in the book:



The prisoner who won the original Euro court ruling was John Hirst, who killed his landlady with an axe in Burghfield, Berkshire, in 1979. Hirst, who served 25 years behind bars, has continued his campaign despite being freed in 2004. But the judges said there would be no compensation payment for any of the ten Scottish prisoners who lodged test cases.
They said the satisfaction of knowing the court had upheld their complaint was enough.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2770227/UK-s-threat-quit-led-Euro-court-votes-prisoners-Strasbourg-runs-scared-puts-issue-September.html#ixzz3EPwWLPFI
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

...And now the hounders have regurgitated that ancient garbage from the notorious WUM 'Vera' about non-existent trips to Chaplins.

Anyone seen Coldwater or Beachy lately?  

Hounder:

Dear Mods please delete this if inappropriate: Or if it has an existing place on the forum. Please BUMP?

I took a look on line and can see that there are many petitions ref the McCann case/couple.

Is it worth starting a new petition to insist as a matter of public concern that the T9 are forced to sit lie detector examinations without them setting the questions?

The questions to be asked should be of the utmost relevance to Madeleine Beth McCann's disappearance and for that I would ask members to help me out
No tongue in cheek questions, just STRAIGHT forward YES or NO questions, that would establish them to be lying or telling the truth.

Regards


The Petition would be presented to Prime Minister/house etc

And then they cry and whine when they are correctly described as HATERS and VIGILANTES.

They do fantasize about their wannabe importance don't they?

lily wrote:Anyone seen Coldwater or Beachy lately?  

I assume you dont mean Coldwater Bay or Beachy Head?

No J-P.  Am speaking about those great forum legends.  

Another of those WUM frauds is some character that calls itself 'Vera' - I believe it hangs around assorted numties now, entrancing them with tales of what its hairdresser said.