Poulton admits she's been harrassing the McCann family

Poulton thinks she's one of these:



They whine a lot, and attach themselves to causes. Right on, sister!

No substance, in other words?

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&start=400


As for Gamble though, who she is clearly desperate to talk to - why is Poulton not doorstepping him? Very simple for her to just turn up and poke her microphone in his face as she does with others so frequently. Is she afraid of doing that to Jim Gamble? Did she deliberately target Kate when she would be alone at home? If there is no attempt to doorstep Jim Gamble then we can be sure that Poulton was just using the technique to bully someone she thought might be weaker than actually was the case. When will we see her doorstepping Mitchell, Gamble, senior Scotland Yard officers, etc,?

Pointy Shrieky may well have thought that her aggression, which is a matter of record, combined with the fat spot-squeezer and her pet thug, were sufficient to intimidate Kate McCann.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&start=400

Top
Re: Sonia Poulton - clearly not what most call a real journa
Postby Truthiness2 » Thu Feb 12, 2015 10:24 am

Indeed, TL, did she turn up with an ex policeman and a man with 90 convictions, who likes to intimidate with photos of himself holding guns, when Kate was on her own?

Did they wait somewhere and make sure GM had left before the 3 of them intimidated her on her own doorstep?

Good questions.

Three against one lone woman. Sounds about right.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&start=400


Re: Sonia Poulton - clearly not what most call a real journa
Postby Truthiness2 » Thu Feb 12, 2015 3:22 pm

Could Poulton calculate how much her boyfriend's convictions and stays in prison cost the taxpayer? Just in the interest of fairness and balance.

And transparency! We must always be Transparent!

Those are excellent points. After all, you cannot be taken seriously when being hypocritical can you?

For all her demands that other people are Transparent, Lily, Poulton hasn't even been Transparent enough to reveal who is bankrolling her Stalkumentary. Transparency requires that she makes it clear who commissioned her.

If she continues to fail to do so, she can't complain if people suspect it was the Murdoch media - especially after she fed BFF Hutton to the Sun sharks.

She does seem to be connected to Mr. M. for sure. She couldn't tell her 'fans' that she is though?

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 2 hrs 2 hours ago
TY for all lovely comments #Skydebate #50Shades Not my personal cup of tea but if a woman chooses to submit that's her prerogative, right!?

Poulton endorses soft-porn muck about young woman manipulated into 'enjoying' being abused.

Disgusting - some feminist she is.

Refuge ‏@RefugeCharity  14 mins14 minutes ago
Remember if your partner tries to control what you wear, who you see & where you go these are warning signs http://www.refuge.org.uk/get-help-now/help-for-women/recognising-abuse/ … #50Shades

Exactly. It's horrifying to see how easily some women are manipulated. It's probably no surprise that Ms Pointy Shrieker is one of them, considering her appalling, self-destructive taste in men.

Sonia Poulton
‏@SoniaPoulton
TY for all lovely comments #Skydebate  #50Shades Not my personal cup of tea but if a woman chooses to submit that's her prerogative, right!?

She's no feminist.

Sonia Poulton ‏@SoniaPoulton
@MrMRiley thank you Matt. Fair to say public have never seen this evidence-based version before from MSM. I think we're all sick of PR now.

Well, no, not if it's 'evidence' from Queen Hoho, Rees the multi-headed hydra troll, Butler the Thief, Hutton the attention-seeker, Kiki/McFadden and the rest of the wingnuts.

With very good reason.

It's shaping up to be a comedy classic, though.

Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton · 3h 3 hours ago
@JBLittlemore @JudeMcKew to be fair, I generally block the pro-abductor pack anyway because they are not here for Madeleine but to obfuscate

No danger of bias there, then.

S'okay, she's only here for herself and Little Big Man knight anyway.

bb1 wrote:
Sonia Poulton @SoniaPoulton  ·  3h 3 hours ago
@JBLittlemore @JudeMcKew to be fair, I generally block the pro-abductor pack anyway because they are not here for Madeleine but to obfuscate

No danger of bias there, then.

Her Documentary is going to be a humdinger of obfuscation. Really boring, and nothing to do with The Facts.

Don't worry, Sabot. No matter how boring it is, her screeching will jolt you awake.

lily wrote:Don't worry, Sabot.  No matter how boring it is, her screeching will jolt you awake.  

Squawker is beginning to look more appropriate, Lily. But of course we will all watch it. And then she can count the hits. Somewhat like Bennett does.

Personally, I think she is deluded enough to believe that she has a right to ask impertinent questions that even The Police wouldn't ask without a Lawyer present.
And I very much doubt that Kate even answered the door. Kate was probably cowering in the kitchen rather than confront this paragon of Justice and Truth, who seriously needs to look at her own hypocrisy.

I do wonder if it's the people she's got involved with, Sabot. In those old Mail pieces, she seems more or less normal, no suggestion that she was about to turn into a shrieking harpy slinging accusations and smears at people. She also looked a lot better, too.

She may be easily influenced by others?

bb1 wrote:I do wonder if it's the people she's got involved with, Sabot. In those old Mail pieces, she seems more or less normal, no suggestion that she was about to turn into a shrieking harpy slinging accusations and smears at people. She also looked a lot better, too.

She may be easily influenced by others?

Is it that easy, Bonny? It didn't work that way for me. I think she is seeing her hoped for career going down the pan, and she is getting a bit past it now, so shit or bust. She will never make it as a high flyer. How sad is that?

Sabot, I don't think she got anywhere with Kate either.

I also think that desperation for her hoped for career has set in. Oh well.....

The company she is currently keeping is, IMO, liable to be her downfall. It's rare to see a woman her age with such woefully bad judgement. Ah well, not our problem.

The stalkumentary should be hilarious.

bb1 wrote:The company she is currently keeping is, IMO, liable to be her downfall. It's rare to see a woman her age with such woefully bad judgement. Ah well, not our problem.

The stalkumentary should be hilarious.

Can't wait. But we are all going to be woefully disappointed. Or not.

Why isn't Poulton telling the truth about those vile tweets Bennett has posted? That she may not have penned them personally, but they were written by her very close associates to intimidate 'enemies'.

Just like that threatening post by her bedmate.



She can't complain if people judge her by the company she keeps.

Sure looks like Poulton endorses her ex-jailbird boyfriend's threat to other people. Still, it's up to her, she really has nothing to complain about if people judge her by her choice of friends. And boyfriends.

So she has cosy chats with Lee Ryan over a spliff about outing anonymous internet posters so he can threaten them.

Are we sure she isn't setting him up as well?