HUTTON TELLS A COMPLETE, OUTRIGHT LIE IN PUBLIC.

Vile, disgusting baggage.

She truly is inappropriate in all directions.

OMG, does Mutton really imagine her self-obsessed, hysterical, attention-seeking drivel is 'empowering' anyone?

While reading that it made me think of Victoria Beckham who wants to empower women.  

So.......is Hutton going to design a line of clothes for assorted haters next?  For instance, the stalking range, the marching in London range and the lounging range for those who hate at home?  

lily wrote:While reading that it made me think of Victoria Beckham who wants to empower women.  

So.......is Hutton going to design a line of clothes for assorted haters next?  For instance, the stalking range, the marching in London range and the lounging range for those who hate at home?  

Hoodies are looking good. Oh, and sun glasses.

So long as she doesn't come out with her version of the Kanye West range. What with her penchant for attention seeking.

lily wrote:So long as she doesn't come out with her version of the Kanye West range.  What with her penchant for attention seeking.

The horror! Oh, the humanity! Strong men would weep in the streets!

I know, Bonny. It would be cruel and unusual punishment.

lily wrote:So long as she doesn't come out with her version of the Kanye West range.  What with her penchant for attention seeking.

A Bullet Proof Vest might be a good idea. And that is not a threat because I haven't got a gun.

You don't normally find genuine humour on the hounders, but this is funny.


Re: An amazing piece of trivia
Post aquila Today

ultimaThule wrote:
Have you tried the Trite Tripe Diet, aquila? It puts me off my food

I'm thinking of not eating until nettles become seasonably available and I might even write a book about it....the joy of soup.


Whatever could they mean?

Hutton knows....

Compulsive liar and maker of false, malicious allegations Hutton thinks she should get money just, cos, well, she's speshul:

I estimate that my case must have cost a minimum of 500K, that money could have settled the claims of 50 survivors at £10,000 each and prevented 50 further trials at a cost of £500k a time.

That's the danger about making false allegations and telling lies in the here and now; it makes people suspect you've been telling lies about a great deal else.

This, remember, is the woman that accused Bennett of taking out a hit on her - why should any sane person believe a word she shrieks?

ETA, it has to be asked - did she latch onto the hounders to flog her mis-mem because she read up on Bennett's rather odd ideas about the Catholic church? And knew she'd get a sympathetic audience?

BTW, doesn't she think it's rather tasteless to be stealing lines from Bill Clinton, of all people, when ranting about 'abuse'? What next, health tips from Harold Shipman?

bb1 wrote:Compulsive liar and maker of false, malicious allegations Hutton thinks she should get money just, cos, well, she's speshul:

I estimate that my case must have cost a minimum of 500K, that money could have settled the claims of 50 survivors at £10,000 each and prevented 50 further trials at a cost of £500k a time.

That's the danger about making false allegations and telling lies in the here and now; it makes people suspect you've been telling lies about a great deal else.

This, remember, is the woman that accused Bennett of taking out a hit on her - why should any sane person believe a word she shrieks?

ETA, it has to be asked - did she latch onto the hounders to flog her mis-mem because she read up on Bennett's rather odd ideas about the Catholic church? And knew she'd get a sympathetic audience?

Not to mention the innocent victims that she Libelled, who probably had to pay to defend themselves.

She's told outright lies about people here, made endless false accusations, she maliciously cloned our members, she's made deranged accusations about Bennett and co - can you seriously imagine Bennett taking out a hit on her?

Yet she demands some mysterious right to be automatically believed and given money? No, I don't think so. It's noticeable that even those of her own kind that previously supported her are edging away as the attention-seeking becomes more strident and the rantings more deranged.

You never can tell with Bennett. Although personally, I don't think he would be prepared to pay the price of a hit. But I can think of some who might do it for a tenner.

Thing is, Hutton imagines she's important, when she's actually more like an irritating, yappy little dog. She seems to be obsessed with Bennett, but isn't getting much reaction from him, so she's getting ever more outrageous and ridiculous.

She's also shedding supporters like dandruff.

She also sounds desperate for money to me.

I hope she isn't going to e-mail people pretending to be a Nigerian prince or something....

Oh....IMO

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1130p15-cristobell-hutton-s-latest-hate-filled-ramblings

Hutton's lost the plot.

OMG So she has.

How funny! She seems to think that slavery ended in America because Laws were Passed (probably by LBJ ) and Lessons were Learned. And doubtless she imagines everyone got compo.....

How can a supposedly grown adult be so totally ignorant? Who can forget her claiming that Portugal was still annoyed with 'Britain' (which didn't even exist at the time) because the Spanish Armada was defeated.....

bb1 wrote:How funny! She seems to think that slavery ended in America because Laws were Passed (probably by LBJ ) and Lessons were Learned. And doubtless she imagines everyone got compo.....

How can a supposedly grown adult be so totally ignorant? Who can forget her claiming that Portugal was still annoyed with 'Britain' (which didn't even exist at the time) because the Spanish Armada was defeated.....

Well Spain, Portugal - all the same innit. All foreign.

It's rare to come across an adult so grossly ignorant, Jean-Pierre. I don't know whether she thinks Portugal is part of Spain, didn't know that the Portuguese were more likely to be cheering the defeat of the Armada or what - she didn't even know that there was no such entity as 'Britain' then, so anything is possible.

Look at this gem, on the end of slavery in the US:


At some point the USA had to acknowledge that slavery was evil and cruel, but they had to introduce laws to bring it to an end. Such is human nature, there was a whole lobby of sadistic creeps who wanted it to carry on. They didn't abolish slavery on a one to one basis, judging each case on its merits, as an ideology it was abolished universally, if it hadn't been, the super rich cotton farmers would have gone to the ends of the earth legally and otherwise, to keep their stock of free labour. Lessons were learned and civilised countries now actively work to prevent slavery in any form

States' Rights? Civil War? John Brown? Fort Sumter? Gettysburg? Sherman's march to the sea? Carpet-bagging? Nothing seems to ring any bells....But hey, Lessons were Learned, so it's all good. I swear she thinks LBJ 'introduced laws' as part of the Civil Rights movement.

Though maybe it isn't so surprising that someone so completely self-obsessed should also be pig-ignorant about anything that doesn't concern herself.

No, Bonny.  It was enacted in l936 after this movie came out in the cinemas.  It made the whole of the US feel guilty....

Mutton probably thinks that's a documentary.....