Sun: Ripper's vile slur

Some forker:

My thoughts too PeterMac, I read the comments this morning on Candyfloss's link, the majority of them were more or less stating a guilty person can suss others or words to that effect. Have been watching Wimbledon most of the day, and now it seems the comments are continuing. This has to be good news surely.

What does it say about your cause when you think that Britain's most depraved, disgusting serial killer espousing your beliefs is 'good news'?

Sick in the head, the whole lot of them. No wonder they idolize gangsters, perjurers and torturers!

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7890

Spudgun is as thick as mince

What does it say about your cause when you think that Britain's most depraved, disgusting serial killer espousing your beliefs is 'good news'?


Normal people would't think that but hey, he's famous isn't he?  So, that must be great......

Between their idiocy over the Wayback business, and their newfound fondness for serial killers, I think we should congratulate the McCann-haters on completely wrecking their own sicko crusade.

Who actually cares when the likes of them think about anything?

Only fellow haters care, Bonny.  

How they can think of themselves as researchers, amateur detectives or any other pseudo thing, I don't know.

Sutcliffe writes under the name Peter Coonan, adopting his mum’s maiden name, and puts his ward and Broadmoor address at the top of each note.


xxxhttp://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/mccanns-are-lying-daily-express.html



Looks like Coonan/Sutcliffe may be hanging around the hate sites?

...And still no sign of outrage from the McCann-haters about any of this. Tells its own story, really.

Prominent hounder:

Re: The Sun - Rippers vile Maddie slur
Post jeanmonroe Today

Snipped from the updated Daily Mail version:

A spokesman for the McCanns told MailOnline: 'We are not going to comment on the word of a psychopathic serial killer. He knows nothing about the case. We will not dignify his views with any comment.'
----------------------------------------------

"He KNOWS 'NOTHING' about the case'
-------------------------

Really, REALLY? *******hate speech redacted*******


......And right now, it's looking like he got it from at the very least reading the blog which carries a translation from French of The Truth - I'm A Liar.

I am sure others are taking an interest in just who Sutcliffe/Coonan has been chatting to on his FB page. And yes, he does have one.

The McCann-haters would do well to wake up and see the giant chasm which is opening under their feet.

I agree with:

"A spokesman for the McCanns told MailOnline: 'We are not going to comment on the word of a psychopathic serial killer. He knows nothing about the case. We will not dignify his views with any comment."

bb1 wrote:
Sutcliffe writes under the name Peter Coonan, adopting his mum’s maiden name, and puts his ward and Broadmoor address at the top of each note.


xxxhttp://frommybigdesk.blogspot.co.uk/2010/03/mccanns-are-lying-daily-express.html



Looks like Coonan/Sutcliffe may be hanging around the hate sites?

Well he found that in 2010.

Another hounder happy that a vile serial killer shares its opinion:


He probably knows what's in the files like anyone who has read them and that's enough!

According to The Telegraph, Sutcliffe got internet access in 2009

They really do need to take a long, hard look at themselves....

That was in April; translations of Gonzo's book appeared on the blog in January 2010.

I hasten to add, I am not blaming anyone for letting 'Peter Coonan' comment on their blog, no-one then would have associated that name with the Yorkshire Ripper.

But these stupid b*tches that have been phoning him, writing to him, showering him with gifts, etc., are entirely another matter.

Absolutely, Bonny.

Still nothing from the haters about this:

Peter Coonan said...
I wish I didn't have a conscience.
Damn that lucky 4%.
1 April 2010 at 00:49

Being on the blog that carries the translation of Gonzo's 'book'?

A fuller copy - just for the record.

Are they discussing it anywhere to your knowledge, Bonny?

Dead silence on the hate sites, Lily - in public, at least.

Can't think why.....

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=7887&start=25

Top
Re: Yorkshire Ripper writes to Penpals about Madeleine
Postby scoobydoo » Fri Jul 10, 2015 11:54 am

I don't know why petermac is acting as if its good a seriel killer supports him. Peter Sutcliffe thought there was something wrong with women walking alone at night or working as prostitutes so he battered them to death. One victim was a much loved only child, sixteen years old, walking home. Her widowed father grieved to death. But petermac thinks peter Sutcliffe has good judgement.

I wonder if peter Sutcliffe is just corresponding with some mad sad old bat who is also an anti, or whether he actually is an anti. If he can get access to a mobile then he can get access to the internet.

Ah, but we know from various press reports that Sutcliffe has virtually unfettered access to the internet - it's his Human Right, or something.

Let's not kid ourselves that he's locked in a concrete cell 24/7; he's in Broadmoor, not a prison proper.

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1265-sykes-take-on-by-your-friends-shall-ye-be-judged

Sutcliffe had plenty of chums years ago:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1318641.stm

Wednesday, 9 May, 2001, 10:28 GMT 11:28 UK
What do women see in Peter Sutcliffe?

And no doubt he has even more now, thanks to the internet.

Quite a read. LL
http://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/11/24/charles-manson-is-getting-hitched-meet-the-women-who-marry-prisoners/

Looking at the way the haters have reacted to their cause being endorsed by the Yorkshire Ripper, it's easy to see how it happens, LL. Some of them are more than stupid enough to contact him asking him for his unique insight, what with him being a deranged, sadistic serial killer.

Indeed, some of them - Stucky, for instance - seem to be taking all this rather personally. Touched a nerve, has it?

Indeed, some of them - Stucky, for instance - seem to be taking all this rather personally. Touched a nerve, has it?


Certainly appears so.  


They can't wait to tell their co-haters that members of the public agree with them.  This is another one.  

Just a reminder of what poor judges of character McCann-haters are:



Chucky singing the praises of a couple that had just killed six of their children.