More hater drama as tabloids allegedly visit them

Odd that this story hasn't been published yet - maybe the Mail are waiting for the right moment? Who can forget the hatchet job the Mail did on those obese trolls that attacked the family whose children were attacked by an urban fox? Must try to find it.....

bb1 wrote:Odd that this story hasn't been published yet - maybe the Mail are waiting for the right moment? Who can forget the hatchet job the Mail did on those obese trolls that attacked the family whose children were attacked by an urban fox? Must try to find it.....

This one? LL http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/parents-blamed-fox-to-save-family-pet-from-being-put-down-online-trolls-false-claims-about-attack-on-8491508.html

Thanks LL - I don't think that's the one, it's in my mind that twins were involved in the incident I'm thinking of. But notice that poor family were abused by trolls, too?

There seems to be a section of society that is so sick in the head, its beyond rescue.

Found them!

Who are the real animals?

UPDATED: 08:54, 2 July 2010

446
View comments

The animal rights fanatics who waged a hate campaign against the fox attack family can be revealed today by the Daily Mail (and, oh yes, they're almost all on benefits). PAUL BRACCHI investigates

The slur is particularly loathsome in the circumstances. For it is aimed at Pauline Koupparis, the mother of the twin girls mauled by a fox in their cots.
'What an attention-seeking wh**e this stupid woman is,' declares the poison pen author, an animal rights activist.
'If she is getting threats GOOD! I have no sympathy for her. I still think she is lying.'
'Stupid'... 'wh**e' ... 'liar' - this brutal vocabulary is part of a hate campaign being waged against Mrs Koupparis and is there, in black and white, for anyone to read on the internet.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1291353/The-animal-rights-fanatics-benefits-left-fox-attack-family-needing-police-protection.html#ixzz47brWqSAC
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook



Annabella Laws, left, and Maria Bartlett, posted vile abuse about the family on a website, including 'I wonder how much she was paid by the fox hunters?' in a reference to a perceived campaign by the pro-hunt lobby


Sounds familiar, doesn't it? And I doubt if anyone was surprised when the trolls involved turned out to have hit every branch of the Ugly Tree on the way down - and were obese with it.



Lisa Gwyther is another animal rights extremist behind the vile internet abuse and wrote how she believed the attack was a trick

Imagine such lovelies being bitter and nasty!

It's no wonder that we get visuals of people just like them when we read their stupid online rants.  

Bushmeat Brown:

(snipped)


So, you can't have it both ways. Unless the political tide has massively turned and the McCanns are now being hung out to dry (which I find extremely unlikely), Scotland Yard can only be one of two things: a farce and the McCanns are guilty and are never go to be convicted of a crime or legitimate and the McCanns have been innocent all along.

Criminal Profiler Pat Brown
May 3, 2016

Starting to get it, is she? So, what does that make her, and the rest of the pitchforking shower of McCann-haters? Besides a lynch mob?

PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB 3h3 hours ago
If you are posting nasty tweets, you are one of the trolls that is giving us a bad name in the media. #McCann

Oh, the irony!

And who encouraged them, pray tell? Does the Brown household not have mirrors?

bb1 wrote:PAT BROWN ‏@ProfilerPatB  3h3 hours ago
If you are posting nasty tweets, you are one of the trolls that is giving us a bad name in the media. #McCann

Oh, the irony!

And who encouraged them, pray tell? Does the Brown household not have mirrors?

I doubt it. Not much point really - no reflection..........

Changed her tune, has she? Tis a bit late. Her damage has already been done.

Oh, maybe that's why Dirtymac demonstrated how EASY it is to open the shutters of 5A from the outside, when he and Bushmeat were on their Ghoul Tour?

" alt="" />

The pair of them were IN IT all along!!!!!!!!!!!!

Why did PeterMac leave Havern's?

He vanished a few months ago, about the same time as questions were being asked about the Gonzo Scrounge Fund - yoyo 'donations' in particular.

Not accusing, just saying.

But he's posting elsewhere, isn't he?

No idea, Sabot.

bb1 wrote:No idea, Sabot.

I thought he was on that MMM place. Havern's do quote him from time to time.

Oh, maybe - I just haven't noticed him anywhere.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6589&start=1725

Doborah Butler's very quiet about her court appearance tomorrow.

Wonder what she's done this time - allegedly, of course!

Some hounder:


I don't take Pat Brown seriously any more. Another choosing the money on the TV $ofa.

What, like Gonzo, who appeared to be living on Dear Julia's daytime telly sofa for a while?

They really are as thick as pig.........

ann-kristine ‏@fiorifan 16m16 minutes ago
@1matthewwright1 Chinagirl's icy demeanour and 'Queen' status on certain forums gives me the heebies. Is it Kate? #mccann

ann-kristine ‏@fiorifan 36m36 minutes ago
So Paranoia central now doesn't believe I was doorstepped. I was.Jill Havern, please stop it. It happened. #mccann

Yeah, whatever you say.

Also in the Sonz thread, but.....an MM member wrote to Poulton, and got this reply:

Hello Anne,

Thank you for getting in touch. We are still struggling with reluctant broadcasters who are unwilling to commit to anything until Operation Grange approaches the end. It's like juggling fire!

I had a word with the Daily Mail journalist behind the doorstepping, tried to put him straight about the story, have no idea if it has done any good!

Wishing you all the best, Anne, I can't wait to be in a position to say 'Yes! We have a broadcast date' that will be a moment to cherish for me, the obstacles have been far greater than any of our team imagined. Take care,

Sonia

Here's the thing.

The person that claimed she was 'doorstepped' is also a close ally of Sonz. And now Sonz claims to have contacted the Mail on said person's behalf.

Nope, nothing at all suspicious about any of this. Perish the thought!

Where do these complete and utter NUTJOBS come from? Care in the community has a lot to answer for.

Are you sure they are serious?