BENNETT FOLDS TO SMETHURST - DONATION TO FIND MADELEINE FUND

bb1 wrote:But that's the whole point, Sabot...Bennett and co spread the lie that this was on Mr Smethurst's page; that is how it was being told on Twitter, Sky, etc.

I have no idea whether or not it was on supposed friends of friends; I suspect not, as no-one has seen it except Bennett and SWALK.

The very last thing Bennett is going to do is follow the eager suggestions of his fellow Hounders.

Even in a letter to CR Bennett could only describe the details as being too depraved (to type in his letter).

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:But that's the whole point, Sabot...Bennett and co spread the lie that this was on Mr Smethurst's page; that is how it was being told on Twitter, Sky, etc.

I have no idea whether or not it was on supposed friends of friends; I suspect not, as no-one has seen it except Bennett and SWALK.

The very last thing Bennett is going to do is follow the eager suggestions of his fellow Hounders.

Even in a letter to CR Bennett could only describe the details as being too depraved (to type in his letter).

He didn't have to type anything. All Bennett had to do was send/enclose, the screen-shots.

crazytony wrote:

lily wrote:

bb1 wrote:But that's the whole point, Sabot...Bennett and co spread the lie that this was on Mr Smethurst's page; that is how it was being told on Twitter, Sky, etc.

I have no idea whether or not it was on supposed friends of friends; I suspect not, as no-one has seen it except Bennett and SWALK.

The very last thing Bennett is going to do is follow the eager suggestions of his fellow Hounders.

Even in a letter to CR Bennett could only describe the details as being too depraved (to type in his letter).

He didn't have to type anything. All Bennett had to do was send/enclose, the screen-shots.

That's right, Tony. He was hoping to get by using his typical waffle but it would surely have been obvious, even to him, that he would have to provide evidence of said 'depraved' words at some point to CR?

And let us not forget his insinuations about drinks at the Elephant and Castle; his incitement to nutjobs to stalk the Smethurst family in Portugal; or what he said about Mr Smethurst's daughter and her friends.

bb1 wrote:Nice one, Tony.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/2011/12/why-didnt-tony-bennett-produce-his.html

And that looks like a direct allegation I see in those tweets?

Very nice one, Tony.

He couldn't send anything because Mr. Smethurst had nothing to do with it.
The posts came from the above mentioned in the screenshot not from Edward Smethurst's facebook at all.
ETA I have checked

The only assumption a reasonable person could make, Tony, is that Bennett set the whole thing up, whether to suit his own agenda, or because he has some kind of mental health issues.

His conduct suggests the latter. As pointed out here:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/topic1782.html

there is something deeply unpleasant about his obsessions; there's a phrase to describe men his age who behave like this.

bb1 wrote:The only assumption a reasonable person could make, Tony, is that Bennett set the whole thing up, whether to suit his own agenda, or because he has some kind of mental health issues.

His conduct suggests the latter. As pointed out here:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/topic1782.html

there is something deeply unpleasant about his obsessions; there's a phrase to describe men his age who behave like this.

Yes Bonny, the man is sick or evil. Perhaps both?

His followers are just as bad, Tony, who can forget the dribbling discussion about 'positions' and 'clothing'?

bb1 wrote:But that's the whole point, Sabot...Bennett and co spread the lie that this was on Mr Smethurst's page; that is how it was being told on Twitter, Sky, etc.

I have no idea whether or not it was on supposed friends of friends; I suspect not, as no-one has seen it except Bennett and SWALK.

The very last thing Bennett is going to do is follow the eager suggestions of his fellow Hounders.

Of course he won't, Bonny. He knows exactly what he did. "Oh, excuse me, Your Honour, it wuz the friend of a friend, and they've deleted it now." A bit like the boyfriend of my sister's lover's husband's best friend. It's a joke. if only it was funny.

zampos Anthony Bennett
I can't tweet any more re the Maddie #McCann case because McCanns have applied for me to be imprisoned for contempt: High Ct hearing 8 Feb
50 minutes ago


He just did - and as he well knows, imprisonment is merely ONE of the penalties the COURT can impose.

Duh.

Paying Smethursts costs. That is going to really hurt.

But not nearly as much as paying the £2500 damages agreed........

I'm sure that all of us would like for him to have to pay a load more into the Fund. The fat lady hasn't sung yet......

So, Bennett has gone totally and utterly round the bend and is now trying to drag people who win X Factor into one of his other vendettas?

The man's lost the plot totally.

her family background is of interest.

No, it isn't, actually - but it looks like Bennett is off on yet another stalk-a-thon. Disgusting creature - he isn't fit to be called a man.

bb1 wrote:So, Bennett has gone totally and utterly round the bend and is now trying to drag people who win X Factor into one of his other vendettas?

The man's lost the plot totally.

Huh

He is now targetting a young girl in some group that won X Factor or something, Tony - I don't watch reality TV, so don't ask me.

He is doing this because he claims some member of her family has something to do with the Balkwell matter....you remember, when the man's widow went on Raptors to beg Bennett to stop it - to protect their young son, apart from anything else.

Bennett's reponse was to sneer at the poor woman; and then he wonders why he is loathed.

bb1 wrote:He is now targetting a young girl in some group that won X Factor or something, Tony - I don't watch reality TV, so don't ask me.

He is doing this because he claims some member of her family has something to do with the Balkwell matter....you remember, when the man's widow went on Raptors to beg Bennett to stop it - to protect their young son, apart from anything else.

Bennett's reponse was to sneer at the poor woman; and then he wonders why he is loathed.

Oh for pity sake, someone please buy him a ticket for the North Pole!

Dirty old man; he just revolts me, personally, Tony.

Hmmm....Little Mix will have a lot of frenzied fans who do anything to protect their idols.

Hmm hashtag anyone

muratfan wrote:Hmmm....Little Mix will have a lot of frenzied fans who do anything to protect their idols.

Hmm hashtag anyone

How foolish! Bennett has mouthed off again!



For those who may find it of use

Bennett has been provoked into this act of self-destruction because he couldn't resist arguing across the internet with Bren over what Gerry said at the Leveson inquiry.

I find myself agreeing with Bren; the pitchforkers are YET AGAIN cherrypicking statements to suit themselves, and ignoring what comes after the word BUT.

Bennett and co are making up disgusting 'theories' with no foundation; that is not 'free speech', it is hate speech, end of.

As for his post...

REPLY: I am breaking my self-imposed silence on the McCann case to make one very specific point in answer to 'Me'. There are indeed a great many irrefutable facts in this case. One cannot e.g. refute the video of Martin Grimes' dogs, because we can all see what happened on a video of their presence in Praia da Luz. The interpretation of the dogs' reactions is another matter. Similarly, if A says: 'B knocked on my front door, I was only in a towel, I sent him away in 30 seconds', while B says: 'I strolled in through the unlocked patio door, sat down and stayed several minutes', it is an irrefutable fact that these two witnesses contradict each other's accounts in a number of signifcant respects. Now, Dr Gerald McCann has stated on oath to the Leveson enquiry that he has no objection to facts. He has also stated on oath to the same enquiry that he has no objection to 'people purporting theories based on facts'. Circumstantial facts are still facts; take Matthew Oldfield's changing statements about the events of 3 May as another example. It's also an irrefutable fact that the McCanns' leading investigator in 2007, Antonio Gimenez Riaz, is now in jail having been convicted of stealing, together with drug-dealers, £25 million of cocaine in 2004 whilst he was a top cop in the Catalonian Police Department in Barcelona. It's another irrefutable fact that the McCanns' leading investigator in 2008 was Kevin Halligen, who has now been in prison for over 2 years and is currently awaiting trial on a $2 million fraud charge.

Theories based on irrefutable facts are exactly what the committal to prison trial on 8 February and the libel trial of Amaral on 9 and 10 February are all about. How far are people allowed to go in 'purporting theories' based on irrefutable facts?

One cannot e.g. refute the video of Martin Grimes' dogs,

Oh yes one can. It passed through the hands of liar, fantasist and master of invention Duarte Levy, who sold it on for a hefty sum.

And even after the Man Mountain had edited it to suit his agenda, the gaping holes in it were obvious to everyone except Gonc and his pitchforker fans.

Circumstantial facts are still facts



Bennett can explain that one to the judge next year