BENNETT CARRIES ON REGARDLESS

I'm not quite sure 'better' is the correct word, Lily - that is rather like having to choose between Ted Bundy and Jack the Ripper...

I see what you mean, Bonny.

Maybe, I should say that I would rather read smiffy over spudders if I were forced to choose.

I have no intention of giving Bennett's latest load of libel and harrassment oxygen...save for this one, hysterically funny remark of his about Ed Smethurst:

Smethurst was brought up largely by the Masons

What, is that like Romulus and Remus being brought up by wolves?

bb1 wrote:I have no intention of giving Bennett's latest load of libel and harrassment oxygen...save for this one, hysterically funny remark of his about Ed Smethurst:

Smethurst was brought up largely by the Masons

What, is that like Romulus and Remus being brought up by wolves?

That is past ridiculous, that is commitable! What does the moron think we are, an orphanage? Maybe his grandfather was a Mason, but I doubt the complete Lodge adopted him! I want to kick someone's head in .... What a stupid LL

They're barking mad, LL, the whole lot of them. Just sit back and marvel at the crazy people

bb1 wrote:They're barking mad, LL, the whole lot of them. Just sit back and marvel at the crazy people

You know, I am looking forward to my week away! No internet, no bennett and his morons, .... bliss! I will miss all of you, of course, but at the rate things are going I'm beginning to feel over-informed! LL

I know what you mean, LL, it's difficult to keep track of it.
But wasn't that a spectacular melt-down by GasparBrat last night

bb1 wrote:I know what you mean, LL, it's difficult to keep track of it.
But wasn't that a spectacular melt-down by GasparBrat last night

Sorry, haven't seen that. Have however just seen on Piers Morgan that Nancy Grace is going to be on Dancing with the Stars - I assume it's the one associated with Pat Brown???? The mind boggles if it is her!!!! Who's next - P Brown and Bret? P Brown and Bennett? Bennett and Bret (who will lead??)? Oh, me dicky ticker!! LL

It's in the members' area, LL - it was too disgusting to put in public

More from 'Me', the person responsible for the bore-a-thon, on the subject of Chicane's post:

Ha! Just had another look on that forum, and their unsavoury and slavish obsession with Bennett means they are utterly convinced I am Tony Bennett hiding and posting under an alternative sobriquet.

From reading the posts (I know not easy to do, but someone had to do it) here’s their theory:

Because Bennett’s under constant “libel watch” over there from the newly formed Carter Ruck Supporters Club, they are convinced that he has created an alter ego (me) on here simply to post items not under his own name so as not to alert the self-styled libel hunters over there.

Then, their mangy conspiracy theory goes, he / me pulls the article from this forum once it has been copied and posted onto their forum so as not to be accused of libel, and then somehow, inexplicably pinning the blame back on the pro forum itself for displaying an article that is no longer available here!

Still with me? And they think every anti is a conspiracy theory obsessed nutter!! Sweet baby Jesus! The level of neurotic paranoia apparently is unlimited.

Let’s not forget the other nugget from their thread about my post.

First some timelines. I originally wrote the post on Friday and uploaded it around midnight. On Saturday morning at around 10.00 am it was put into its own thread by the mods here.

I then asked the mods if they could take it down because I wanted to make some changes to it before it went in its own thread (it was originally written as a reply for another thread). It wa pulled around 10.20 am

These changes and other events on Saturday meant I couldn’t get it posted back up until midnight Saturday evening.
However according to the postings on that forum, those charming people at Carter Ruck, who appear to be doing for free speech and justice what the Boston strangler did for door to door salesmen , were aware of my post on Saturday morning as well!

So the article was up for no more than 10 hours, most of which were the dead of night, and still Carter Ruck were "aware of it"!

I’m now wondering if Carter Ruck are the new fourth emergency service, on call all hours, day or night and especially at weekends?

In relation to this lunatic theory that I am Tony Bennett, I have to say I feel a Spartacus moment coming on.

I’M TONY BENNETT (come on everybody, all join in)
==================================

What a Silly Billy Spudders is! Why is he trying to blame Bennett for that cure for insomnia? And if he doesn't know that 10 hours is a very long time in cyberspace, he really should stick to filming fish

Could someone introduce them both to Sharks? Whoops, sorry, they probably already know all of their relations.

Anyone know why the person guilty of the bore-a-thon has directed this remark at Chicane:

Whatever floats your boat, I couldn’t care less.

Whilst ranting at great lengths about his own talent and general wonderfulness?

Mind you, the rant was better than the bore-a-thon - much funnier

Oh, Lord spare us, the bore-a-thon person is now demonstrating how little he/she/it cares for Chicane's opinion by doing that shouting-across-the-internet thing at her

Carry on, do, it's a vast improvement on Now Is The Time To Be Brave2

I like this bit best:

the whole world can see who the idiot is

Yes, we sure can, it's the attention-seeking bore who threw a giant hissy fit because people laughed at the bore-a-thon

The little man is trying too hard to be a big man.

Epic FAILURE

I see Bennett is making a pillock of himself again, still apparently ignorant of the meaning of the phrase 'public interest'.

Though why he thinks any police force is going to tell a nosy, nasty, stalker like him anything is beyond me.

It isn't as if the police don't know all about him and his lunatic fans, the Rothley Stalking, etc.

Oh, and the Home Office were send screenshots of his posts authorizing his nutjobs to stalk women and children on the offchance they might have heard of muratfan.


And no doubt Scotland Yard are very well aware of the complaints against Bennett made by his current victims, and his targetting of children.

Dear me!

Re: MET POLICE: Can't answer your FOI Act questions yet because of the 'public interest' test
kikoraton
Thank you for this information, TonyBennett.
My view is that we need not consider it in any way time-wasting or obstructive.
Thanks for taking the trouble to write.

Sorry old bean, it's both - and a few other things as well.

Do they think that Scotland Yard don't know that lot will send info to Gonc, the convicted liar?

Any reasonable person could be forgiven for thinking that they are deliberately trying to interfere with, and obstruct, a UK police matter.

Not to mention wasting taxpayers' money yet again....

Oh my very dear! In order to show how little they care about criticism, the 'Me' person has gone LOOKAMEE!!!! LOOKAMEE!!!!! yet again, with a Five Star Yawner
Don't see many bothering to read it, they'll just measure it and decide they can't be ar@ed

I'm sure they thought everyone was going to be stupid enough to copy that load of waffle and libel, and hold earnest discussions about it, Lily.

Sadly for the haters, everyone could see it was just an interminably long way of saying, I hate them McCanns, they DONE IT.

Oh, you missed off a bit, Bonny.

'And look at me.'

Guess what? He's done it AGAIN
No, I didn't bother reading it, if you have to scroll down several times to read the whole thing, IT'S TOO LONG.

But 'Me' is still going



Oh, and how egotistical do you have to be to pick 'Me' for a nic, anyway

bb1 wrote:Guess what? He's done it AGAIN
No, I didn't bother reading it, if you have to scroll down several times to read the whole thing, IT'S TOO LONG.

But 'Me' is still going



Oh, and how egotistical do you have to be to pick 'Me' for a nic, anyway

You couldn't make it up.

You certainly couldn't...this hater liked it...

Very well written piece, outlining unequivocally the situation. If anyone reading that cannot grasp the differences between cleared and investigation shelved due to non-cooperation then they clearly don't know the difference between their @rse and a whole in the ground.



I suspect whale omelet to be on the menu for quite a while

Leaving aside the fact that they appear to be semi-illiterate.....are they seriously trying to spin the archiving dispatch by 180 degrees?

It does NOT say 'investigation shelved due to non-co-operation'.

It says:

b) The archiving of the Process concerning Arguidos Gerald Patrick McCann and Kate Marie Healy, because there are no indications of the practise of any crime under the dispositions of article 277 number 1 of the Penal Process Code.

That means

CLEARED

INNOCENT

It really is time the haters got it into their thick skulls that they are getting their kicks from persecuting the parents of a missing child, and the big wide world despises them for it.