BENNETT CARRIES ON REGARDLESS

I think he wanted to join and they rejected him as he was not of good enough character.

The Buffs probably showed him the door too, it's hard to imagine Bennett doing anything for the good of others.

lily wrote:I think he wanted to join and they rejected him as he was not of good enough character.

Really, anyone know who his sponsor was?

I doubt if he had one, Tony - he probably battered on the door demanding to be allowed in

bb1 wrote:I doubt if he had one, Tony - he probably battered on the door demanding to be allowed in

Well, he would have to be of good character to start with.
Lying, graffiti and stalking, do not a good character makes.

However, this gent might help him out?

Them Masons is Evil, them is. According to Bennett, anyway:


TTW4
Tony Bennett Today at 6:55 pm

aiyoyo wrote:
I remember ttw4. He wrote extensively about freemasons involvement and no one took him seriously. He was very knowledgeable about it and he even asked about a bag Gerry was carrying.

I spoke to TTW4 and met him on a couple of meetings to discuss the case in depth, he probed me about my stance on Freemasonry and I told him I would have nothing to do with it and regarded it as having great potential for doing evil, though I recognise that at the junior level it may be a cosy meeting-place for businessmen and the like. He seemed satisfied. I think he was right to probe into the Masonic aspects of the Madeleine McCann case and he made some good observations IIRC. He was a bit of a tecchie with a talent for graphics. I lost touch with him and don't know if his blog is still going?

I think he meant to say,

Harlow Lodge told me they would have nothing to do with me, as they regarded me as having great potential for evil

Frankly, Bennett's disgusting conduct, from persecuting innocent people onwards, culminating with his attempt to intimidate Ed Smethurst via his family, would get him blackballed from any club, drummed out of any regiment.

ETA:



Nope, he would be thrown into one of the Bedrock tarpits, Tony.

Getting a proverbial slap down by the Solicitors' Regulating Authority would not have helped had his attempt been post that........

Photos of Freemasons in their full regalia are relatively rare - and ones of Edward Swethurst in his apron are even rarer, but thanks to a kind Freemason (not in the East Lancashire Branch I hasten to add), one has become available, you'll see Edward Smethurst in Photo No. 9 running down this link, the tall chap on the back row just to the left (as you look at it) of the large portrait hanging on the wall.


It would appear not all Masons are bad, where Bennett is concerned
Taken from the above paragraph but thanks to a kind Freemason

They are not in the SLIGHTEST bit rare - what a bl**dy fool Bennett is!

Just type masonic lodge into google image, and there are countless photos of local businessmen in Lodge regalia.

They wouldn't let Bennett in, pound to a penny.

DCB on pfa:

http://www.pfa2.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=8362

A message to havern
by dcb2 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:01 pm

Approximately 90% of the posts on your forum (using the bennett theory of applying percentages), are providing proof that the pending court cases against Wbro bennett (application pending) are valid.

A defamation case has to be proved by showing that defamation and damage actually existed - you forum proves that without a shadow of doubt. The speed it spread around the internet - hey - even to luzlady and luz from Portugal, proves the case against bennett. Don't forget that the compassionate luzlady from Portugal had only taken an interest in the case before she read the stuff that bennett posted. The bennett information kick started her into action and she started posting information from her personal experiences from Portugal.

Of course, bennett himself with his posts on your forum has proved that he breached the agreement that he gave to the Mccanns and the Court.

Are you providing a platform or a diving board for bennett?

Quite - and Bennett had better bear in mind, the spread of his invented filth over the internet was all duly recorded.
He needn't bother squealing, it is entirely his fault that the likes of StinkyTDH was merrily posting disgusting material dreamed up by T. Bennett anywhere he could.

The buck stops at Bennett.

And if he thought he could get in by saying who his dad was, even if he wasn't a Mason (I wonder if he was and that's why bennett hates them so??) it doesn't work that way, at least it didn't when I became one. I got into the Masons by being nominated by my peers; I was given the choice to join or not; I decided, after a chat with my dad on the pros and cons of taking up the offer, to accept. You do NOT automatically become eligible because of who your father/grandfather is/was, or whether they were a member or not, at least not in my Lodge. LL

Lamplighter wrote:And if he thought he could get in by saying who his dad was, even if he wasn't a Mason (I wonder if he was and that's why bennett hates them so??) it doesn't work that way, at least it didn't when I became one. I got into the Masons by being nominated by my peers; I was given the choice to join or not; I decided, after a chat with my dad on the pros and cons of taking up the offer, to accept. You do NOT automatically become eligible because of who your father/grandfather is/was, or whether they were a member or not, at least not in my Lodge. LL

You do NOT automatically become eligible because of who your father/grandfather is/was, or whether they were a member or not, at least not in my Lodge.
Indeed you don't, LL.

honestbroker wrote:Is that him in the picture?

Looks to me as though he has a beard?

This is definitely Edward Smethurst and he doesn't have a beard.

Beards can be grown and shaved off, of course ..,

http://www.thisislancashire.co.uk/news/1857924.east_lancs_solicitor_leads_madeleine_hunt/

He is in the 9th picture down second from the left at the back. No beard.

honestbroker wrote:I was looking at the right picture, Tony. I would say he has a beard, or at the very least is unshaven.

I wasn't looking at the chap to his right (our left as we look at the picture) who definitely has a beard.

Yes I am speaking second left as we look at it. I isolated cut and enlarged. I found it is merely a shadow on his face.

Bennett could never be a Mason, he is dishonest, untrustworthy, deceitful, and he enjoys tormenting vulnerable people - no-one who saw it will ever forget him sneering at the widow who wished to protect her son from him.

And as for what he did at the weekend, trying to intimidate Smethurst by stalking his family - especially women and children - shameful! Not the mark of any kind of a man at all.

Of course they don't want him, who would?

He was at least truthful when he said that some people call him evil and perverted - on TV.

bb1 wrote:Bennett could never be a Mason, he is dishonest, untrustworthy, deceitful, and he enjoys tormenting vulnerable people - no-one who saw it will ever forget him sneering at the widow who wished to protect her son from him.

And as for what he did at the weekend, trying to intimidate Smethurst by stalking his family - especially women and children - shameful! Not the mark of any kind of a man at all.

If he had been a Mason, just the things you have listed above would result in him being expelled. Members have been expelled for far less. LL

Oh FFS, the sickos on Havern are starting on the twins now - and I am not repeating it in public.

ETA, the sick barsteward thinks it is clever to refer to a little girl as having been 'created'

Bennett arrested

Maggs,

Maggs wrote:Bennett arrested

Maggs wrote:Bennett arrested

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=bcb355153838b833

That's a very good point, Tony - last night's Luz was instructed to stalk a woman round PLD.


Oh, and I will stick the paper in Satire too, Maggs