Bizarre statements from Gonc witnesses courtesy of Mail

Too funny!

http://www.gerrymccannsblogs.co.uk/press/77sep13/AnneGuedes_12_09_2013.htm#ltd8ml

Libel trial Day 08 Witness 01 Mario Sena Lopes text from PDF 05-11-2013




Please note: This is the unofficial unedited version,
the Official Edited version to follow when made available.


Posted with kind permission of Anne Guedes'


Guedes and John not finished 'editing' the Approved Version yet? Goebells would be proud of them!     

      

How pompous can you get?  With kind permission.......wants to sound like the Queen or something? 

This is the unofficial unedited version,
the Official Edited version to follow when made available.


If the Truthseekers really can't see the irony of that statement......     

In other words, the propaganda will be posted in due course. 

      

It's worthy of the old Pravda.

yes bb1: "that's a fairly lethal cocktail involving mixing whisky with liqueur whisky....

Too expensive for him anyway, and a bit out of his league - it's for gentlemen, not oafs."

bb1 wrote:

      

AnneGuedes
Executive Member


Re: Anything and everything
« Reply #172 on: Today at 10:00:48 PM »

Quote from: Opposing Pat on Today at 09:59:19 PM
There's just one more to go !


Yes. Just a little effort more..

A very unseemly display over on inJustice - pretendy court reporter Guedes and some other hater openly boasting about their efforts to get people banned.

May as well throw her reports, officially edited or not, in the bin, for all anything from such a biased source is worth,

She is probably so far up her own backside that she really thinks she is something.

We all know differently.  

Guedes cackling with another hater about driving people who support the McCann family off the inJustice site:

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t215p195-no-justice-on-the-justice-forum-nor-will-there-ever-be




Why they are being allowed to call anyone who supports Madeleine and her family 'cockroaches' escapes me, but it was nice of Guedes to reveal her true agenda.

Thereby making her 'officially edited court reports' utterly valueless.

Sheesh. And John wonders why we get uptight sometimes.

It's damning, Sabot. Has she been plotting with the other haters by pm to provoke people with her passive-aggressive act? I wouldn't be surprised.

She mangles the English language, anyway. A recent gem:

The Rachel Charles case, commented on this forum, has nothing to do with a strange perpetrator introducing himself in a child's bedroom. She was the victim of a familiar.

A familiar?????? OMG!!!! Who knew there was a coven of black witches in the Algarve???? It all makes sense now!!!!!

Can't wait for her reaction when Gonc loses.  

The reaction of the dimwits who have been believing every word of the Officially Edited Court Reports is going to be even better, Sabot. They have a totally false picture of events.

No doubt the McCann-haters will then decide the judge is IN IT; they've already started on the PJ at Gonc's behest.

They are never going to believe anything that doesn't condemn The McCanns, Bonny. They are a lost cause, but only unto themselves. No one of any importance takes any notice of them anymore.

Love to see them Spam The Judge.

They'll stalk her, Sabot. They will be desperate to find out her granny's blood group, or if her uncle was a mason - you know what they're like.  

Any idea how old she is?

Beyond she's female, I know nothing about the judge, Sabot. But the very fact of being female decreases the risk of Cristovao and his 'dossiers'......

Quote from: AnneGuedes on Today at 08:08:19 PM
Do you really think that a police officer would assault a murderer in order to find where she buried the murdered one ? Haven't you read Barra da Costa's opinion in a link you sent saying a part hadn't been translated ?

Yes, actually, I think dirty cops would do it without thinking twice, especially if they thought they could get away with it.

Odd, isn't it, that it doesn't bother the McCann-haters that despite being tortured, neither of the Ciprianos appeared to know where Joana was.

Odd, isn't it, that it doesn't bother the McCann-haters that despite being tortured, neither of the Ciprianos appeared to know where Joana was.

In that case, anyone would think that they could not possibly have killed her.  

They were hardly likely to admit that they killed her and then refuse to say where the body was. It doesn't make sense.

I noticed that, in the discussion elsewhere about the matter, that the Gonzo fans failed to mention who wrote the 'forensic psychology' report on the evils of red trousers.

Wonder why Guedes and co didn't make it plain that it was Gonc Stooge Sargento - yes, one of his libel trial witnesses - who wrote it?

Or rather, I don't.

Ten days on, and still no sign of the Officially Edited Court Report of Antonio Paulo dos Santos' disastrous witness testimony from Guedes.

What's the problem? No way of rewriting, sorry, Officially Editing, this one to make Gonzo look good, especially as its already made headlines in the Mail?

Not that her Officially Edited Court Reports are worth a light, anyway, not after she was merrily boasting about scheming to get people who support the McCann family - or 'cockroaches', as her chums were calling them - banned from the inJustice site:



Acting on orders from Gonzo, is she?

Of course Amoral has organized them. We should be laughing at him since that is the best that he can do.

Desperate Dan the Amoral Man.