WHERE ARE THE PUBLIC APOLOGIES?

We all saw them do it; pitchforker after pitchforker accused two innocent men of murder because:

In the case of Greg Reardon because his mouth was the wrong shape

In the case of Christopher Jefferies because they didn't like his eyes and his hair stuck out.

So, where are the fulsome apologies to these two men for the vile remarks they all posted?

They will do a Bennett and say that whilst they are never wrong, it was a mistake?

Any chance of a public apology to Ms Yeats' grief-stricken family for remarks like this, made while the trial was ongoing?

Why would an educated guy with a girlfriend, good job etc lose his cool so quickly, Jo"s Parents said when Tabak was arrested that Jo had never mentioned him . Maybe he too had been drinking and when he tried it on with Jo, who also had been drinking and was lonely,she was originally compliant and he turned nasty when she tried to stop him.

======================

we must assume that Jo was willing initially which maybe throws a different light on this

============================

I wonder if she was in a huff bacause he [her boyfriend] was going away and maybe didn't invite her? Maybe when she saw Tabak, she may of thought, I'll show you! And invited him in then changed her mind?
=======================================



I"m not getting this at all. Here we have a well educated friendly guy with a live in girlfriend, who molests a neighbour after 10 minutes in her Company?
==================================


Do you think maybe he and Jo ended up on the Bed and she backed off which is when he got violent.I seem to remember that Tabak"s DNA was on her trousers........or have I got it wrong.LOL

===================================================
How dare they speculate in that disgusting fashion about a murder victim's last, fearful minutes on this earth!

I suppose it would be too much to hope that this would teach them to STFU and stop making up stories to entertain themselves and their fellow-ghouls?

As for...

have I got it wrong.LOL

yes. Horribly, cruelly wrong, in best pitchforker fashion - and pitchforking murder victims isn't 'LOL' - it's sick.

By the way, these are just the ones still in public; we all saw Bennett and others spouting their disgusting 'theories' and filthy speculations about a murder victim and her family till they removed their obscene imaginings from public view.

WE MUST ASSUME?

WE don't have to assume anything, and WE didn't.

Isn't it horrible? Yet they saw nothing wrong in victimizing a murder victim all over again.

Would they like Ms Yeates' family to see that? Because remarks like that have a habit of being hoovered up onto google.

Oh, why am I even asking - they wouldn't care. It never occurs to them that the people they are 'discussing' and 'debating' are real human beings.

It never occurs to them that there is anything in the slightest bit wrong with their disgusting speculations about people who are already suffering.

Oh look, here is one of the MM supersleuths commenting during the summer:

The information we have appears to rule out a sexual motive by an opportunist or random killer. Are there people around who get a kick out of strangling young women when the opportunity presents itself without the need to sexually assault them? Well, yes there probably are, but thankfully few and far between and, they don't usually go to all the trouble of removing a body, only to leave it where it can easily be found a few miles away.


Reality makes that supersleuth look a bit stupid, doesn't it?

I do like Google Bot. And he doesn't even need to Register.