WHY DON'T FORKERS READ THE PJ FILES?

I ask, because of the discussion going on on MM about babies and 'heelstick' tests.

This gem has appeared:

Re: Needham vs. Healy
Autumn Today
cass wrote:
all my children had this test i think its called a guthrey test SPELLING i think they are saved but not sure tbh


Its still a routine test I think cass and, if you don't want your baby to have it, the onus is on the parent to say so. I can't find anything to say whether the blood is stored on a DNA data base but if its not, then its something the government should be considering.

If Madeleine was given this test and her blood stored then there would have been no question about her DNA profile. As it is we only have Gerry's word for it that the pillowcase was Madeleine's. Still puzzled why they couldn't get any DNA from the apartment or her belongings, given that she had been there for nearly a week.

What? What on earth does she think this is?

http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic10.html

quote:

The Forensic Science Service(R) received the [above] objects on 7 August 2007, in sealed, secure packages.

On 8 August 2007, the Forensic Science Service(R) received a piece of cloth/cotton wool (object MJN994) from Leicestershire Constabulary. That object was inside a sealed package.

On 12 October 2007, the Forensic Science Service(R) received a blood spot in a cardboard frame (object JRB/1) from Leicestershire Constabulary. That object was inside a sealed package.

Objective

Th objective of the laboratory examination was to examine the presented objects with respect to the presence of blood, cellular material and hair that may prove to be [have been] from Madeleine McCann or one or other member of her family, or from any of the Portuguese police who had been active [working/present] at the crime scene.

and:


Reference sample of blood

JRB/1 Madeleine McCann
From this sample was obtained a DNA reference sample that was different from those of her immediate family, described above. This DNA profile was the same as that obtained from possible spots of saliva existing on the pillowcase (SJM/1)

What on earth do they think JRB/1 was, if not a 'heelstick' sample?

And why are they still repeating the rubbish about 'none of Madeleine's DNA being found'? Can they still not grasp that UNCONTAMINATED samples were needed? Mind you, they still can't grasp that only 15 markers associated with Madeleine, out of 37, were found...

Iris Today
Autumn wrote:

Do we know where the control Madeleine DNA came from?


Probably from the policeman who spent a lot of time with the McCanns at the villa, and had meals with them. If that had been me I am sure I could have sneeked something away, even a little thing, like hairs off a hairbrush left lying around.

So, a bit of cast-off hair that could have come from anyone, and was purloined by a PJ officer, with no chain of custody, nothing, would have been preferable...

TO A HEELSTICK SAMPLE OF MADELEINE'S BLOOD DELIVERED PROPERLY BY THE UK POLICE?

bb1, I think I know the answer to the title of this topic:

because forkers´s sick brain can´t allow or understand things that are against their sick fantasies.

They do this all the time, Pedro, churn out absolute nonsense which proves, over and over again, that they have been so busy pouring hatred at the McCanns, they haven't actually bothered to read and understand the official PJ files.

Yes bb1, you´re right.

This really pisses me off. Just how thick are they? Of course there was DNA from Madeleine in 5A, but it will have been contaminated by ordinary, everyday use by the rest of The Family.
And what does it prove anyway?
When Madeleine is found it will be very easy to prove that she is a child of The Family, even if they don't have specific DNA from her. Unless The Forkers think that The World is litter with McCann children.

Textuseless says:
Very interesting - and I imagine that is the sort of stuff that will be contained in some of the unreleased PJ files, which include:

"Analysis of first round of witness statements"
"Analysis of second round of witness statements"
"Analysis of events described by McCann parents"

*sigh*

Why do they never ever bother to read ALL the files, instead of just cherry-picking parts of them?

IT'S BEEN DONE - YEARS AGO


http://themaddiecasefiles.com/topic1170.html

ANALYSIS REPORT OF THE FIRST 11 VOLUMES OF THE INQUIRY (pages 1-3004) Central Department of Criminal Investigation, February, 5th, 2008

Bonny, illiterate people can't read.

I find it stunning that they swallow down all this codswallop from the likes of smiffy and his Sauces, totally unaware that they are being played for fools.

BECAUSE THE PJ HAVE ALREADY DONE ALL THIS

The senior officers raised eyebrows about the children being unattended- but that was it.

The phone records were meticulously re-checked - No smoking gun.

The statements were meticulously re-checked - No smoking gun.

The wonderwoofs were re-checked - No smoking gun, just a lot of doubts being raised about the behaviour of Eddiewoof.

They really need to take their hategoggles off and deal with reality, not guff from the likes of smiffy and Morais.

Because it is much easier for a bunch of sick morons to continue with their madness, than read to is written at the files.

http://arpitk.files.wordpress.com/2010/10/crazy_man1.gif

Oh, that's a good one, Pedro:

bb1 wrote:Oh, that's a good one, Pedro:

They seem incapable of grasping this part:


From the analysis no noticeable discrepancies can be found from the depositions made by the intervenients, and also between those statements and other elements to which they were compared, namely, the registries of the crèches entrances and exits of the children, registries of the tennis classes and phone calls.

These 'inconsistencies' and 'discrepancies' they are so obsessed with exist only in their heads; unless they think they know better than the senior PJ officers who carried out the review?

Why they insist on claiming that the PJ agree with Gonc and his Fridge Theory is a mystery to me, because it simply is not true.

Yes bb1, crazytony, that shows how crazy antis truly are.