Bennett already going back on promise he made on BBC Television

This is getting ridiculous.

Oh my very dear, now whoever's admin is having a fit of Blue Ink Rage.

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
8RB Today at 12:02 pm

Post deleted.

8RB



Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
8RB Today at 12:04 pm

Post deleted.

Now bugger off.

Don't they know EVERYONE is watching this meltdown, and wondering why whoever is admin today doesn't want the members to see posts like:

Your banning of me just exposes your utter hypocrisy with regard to your claim to be a supporter of freedom of speech/expression.

Before I was submitted to your pathetic censorship I was about to commence the lengthy process of responding to all the posts directed at me in the preceding seven or eight pages.

Your actions have of course prevented that. I am sure that the forum members who show no interest in anything which may jar their firmly held views or which may demand thought from them will be applauding your censorship. I suspect there are others who are interested in discussion and debate and views which don't always match their own who will be less inclined to support your actions. When a "leader" (admin whoever you may be) has to hide information from those who are being led (forum members in this case) there is good reason to wonder why.

There is no justification in your decision to ban me for posting the facts I had posted. They were not malicious in any way. They were truthful. Had I been allowed to post I would have challenged Tony over his claim that there was no list of names. He knows that he is hiding the true facts in that statement as do those who matter such as Judge Tugendhat.

Now, why do they want to censor that?

The meltdown and censorship continues:

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Exasperated Today at 12:10 pm

Post deleted.

No wonder this corner of the internet is in stitches, watching their much-vaunted 'Free Speach' go out the window.

Now who would use blue ink? That's a tough one.

I LOVE how everyone looking in (CR, media etc) can see his version of free speech in action.

Censorship at this level is completely self-defeating. It just shows everyone that they have something to hide.

I am in hysterics watching them. They cannot even come up with decent reasons for banning people.

And to delete posts is even worse.

I wonder if 9RB will turn up soon or can they ban names in advance? I can imagine Bennett or whoever is playing at admin spending the afternoon banning 9RB up to 10000RB.

Blue ink? Now, that rings a bell - I know I've seen someone using blue ink a lot in edits, etc., but I can't quite recall the name...

Oh wait, it wasn't Alan Marc Lagoa, was it? Or was it Ray Stevens....

lily wrote:Now who would use blue ink? That's a tough one.

I LOVE how everyone looking in (CR, media etc) can see his version of free speech in action.

lily wrote:Now who would use blue ink? That's a tough one.

I LOVE how everyone looking in (CR, media etc) can see his version of free speech in action.

Excellent point. The recent farce in court where Bennett was completely humiliated and didn't even seem to know why he was there brought a great deal of media attention to that forum. It was mentioned in court a few times I believe.

It certainly was not the kind of media attention they were expecting.

They are the laughing stock of the Internet and especially I suspect the legal beagles looking in. And Bennett himself is the focus of all that laughter. You don't need to make it up. They make themselves look complete fools.

And now this is happening there for all those media people to see.

I see they have censored Exasperated too, for posting the most sensible post that forum has seen in months.

Censorship at this level is completely self-defeating. It just shows everyone that they have something to hide.

This is looneytunes behaviour, IMO. Are the Bennett Cult the only people not allowed to know what the Dear Leader actually said in court?

The behaviour of whoever is admin today suggests they are hiding a great deal indeed from their members.

And no doubt the various incarnations of 'RB' will continue to show on the memberlist, as they play the numbers game.

I see they have censored Exasperated too, for posting the most sensible post that forum has seen in months.

They seemed unaware that an awful lot of people were watching, and taking copies of the posts 'admin' didn't want the members to read:

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Exasperated Today at 12:10 pm

I am really exasperated. I watch from outside the fray normally and I was pleased to see some real debate happening yesterday. I was looking forward to more today, but as usual someone slightly off message is removed and banned for a minor infraction.

It is because no alternate views are ever expressed here that so much error happens. Before Tony went to court, most people here truly believed that he would play a blinder and win over the heart and mind of Tugenhadt. People who knew the law knew that he was on a loser from the start. This unrealistic expectation about Tony's chances arose because no one is ever exposed to real debate. The same argument is now being applied to the chances of Tony being allowed to petition for the lifting of the undertaking and starting a libel case.

When someone like 6RB comes along and starts describing the reality of the situation (and most of us well versed in the law know he is speaking the truth) then real debate can start. But becasue of the ban button, people will remain in ignorance of the law and will be continually surprised when the entirely predictable happens.

Using the ban button like this just cuts down the likelihood of understanding the true situation. You are not alone as all forums on this issue have polarised, all claim the high ground, and all are misleading themselves y not allowing any debate- this goes for pros and antis alike. The situation is as tribal as football- my team right or wrong and no quarter given.

Rational and educated people do not act like this- they seek out discussion and exchange of views in order to understand the reality of the world.

It is, of course, your choice to ensure such a narrow world view, but it will lead to continuous disappointments when reality bites as it has done over the investigation, the archiving, the current position of the McCanns, and in the recent Tony Bennett fiasco.

Listening is the only way to learn.

----------

Shocking that they should feel the need to censor that.

The hounders are in total denial:

Tony doesn't need us to tell him anything. Tony is the one facing the "dangers" in all of this.

I feel we are here to try and offer him support in the only way we know how. At least I am, but of course sometimes someone will post and it seems to me that we do not all feel the same here.

I think it was smoke and mirrors who posted not long ago asking for lurkers to come and show support and I feel that is what we did yesterday.


But how does insisting that black is white help matters? The very LAST thing Bennett needs is blind loyalty and unthinking obedience - look where that has got him so far.

He was within a whisker of a jail cell yesterday because of idiots like yoyo, who are determined to stifle the truth and make everyone toe the party line.

It's yoyo and co Bennett should be blaming for his woes, not people who are telling the truth about his situation.

bb1 wrote:The hounders are in total denial:

Tony doesn't need us to tell him anything. Tony is the one facing the "dangers" in all of this.

I feel we are here to try and offer him support in the only way we know how. At least I am, but of course sometimes someone will post and it seems to me that we do not all feel the same here.

I think it was smoke and mirrors who posted not long ago asking for lurkers to come and show support and I feel that is what we did yesterday.


But how does insisting that black is white help matters? The very LAST thing Bennett needs is blind loyalty and unthinking obedience - look where that has got him so far.

He was within a whisker of a jail cell yesterday because of idiots like yoyo, who are determined to stifle the truth and make everyone toe the party line.

It's yoyo and co Bennett should be blaming for his woes, not people who are telling the truth about his situation.

To say that Bennett does not need help when the man looked a total prat in front of Mr Justice Tugendhat recently, not even understanding what the charges he was there for, is about as daft a comment as they can make.

They really are muppets aren't they?

His version of free speach but only for himself sure looks more ridiculous when you read how he is planning to go to the EU Court for his equal rights under Article 10.

I'm sure that won't be lost on CR and the media.......

bb1 wrote:Blue ink? Now, that rings a bell - I know I've seen someone using blue ink a lot in edits, etc., but I can't quite recall the name...

Oh wait, it wasn't Alan Marc Lagoa, was it? Or was it Ray Stevens....

There are those two and might even be Bob Southgate the way things are going, Bonny.

This reminds me of nothing as much as the occasion when sans-souci was driven from not-Bennett's site, with finger-pointing, shrieks and cries of TROLL!!!! For the unforgiveable sin of attempting to give Bennett sensible legal advice for free.

That's worked out well for Bennett, hasn't it?

That's worked out well for Bennett, hasn't it?

Oh yes. Sans was ever the gentleman throughout the whole thing.

The only thing that Bennett has gained is that his hounders think he is a victim. Is that what he wanted in all of this? To not listen to those who could give him the best advice?

It's fascinating to watch the paranoia in action, isn't it?

If anyone dares to point out the trapdoor right under Bennett's feet, well, they must be a TROLL!!!!, or Evil Clarrie, or an employee of Carter Ruck, or that PR company that is their latest fixation.

They cannot grasp that it is possible for people to point out where they are going wrong without an ulterior motive, but simply because it's obvious to everyone but them.

All these outbursts of censorship, paranoia and downright rudeness reveal is how badly rattled and scared they all are, and how incapable they are of grasping reality, IMO.

....And here comes yoyo, proving exactly what I mean:


Call it different perspective or whatever. I dont think it is down to that. I, too, agree dissent yet simultaneously constructive views can be invaluable, and good for sake of debates.

However, when someone harps on incessantly about more doom and gloom for TB citing technical details of the law to the letter it is never simply a case of wanting to impart that knowledge in good faith. And, BTW dont assume people here are totally ignorant of the technical aspects of the law, people just don't brag about it, then get offended when others refused to read their posts "diligently" or take them as gospels.
As a matter of interest, she did not deny or refute claims she was here to spy, and largely to act as propaganda machine for the mclibels. In a nutshell she was an activist for the other side. Anyone who knows of this forum and its significance would not have come onto it, select this particular thread, then harp on incessantly about the technicalities of the law only from mcnasties perspectives. It just does not make sense or add up.

Apart from noting he was very au fait with the legal aspects of this recent verdict, have you missed out how she made a snide remark about PM in her sniggering cunning little voice about him being "ex-copper" and all that?

And on and on and on the rant goes, before ending with:

And BTW the "9RB" is not lost on me.

I think it will be on anyone not in the grip of rampant paranoia......

PS:

have you missed out how she made a snide remark about PM in her sniggering cunning little voice

Since when did forum posts have a sound track? No-one else could hear this 'voice'......

bb1 wrote:PS:

have you missed out how she made a snide remark about PM in her sniggering cunning little voice

Since when did forum posts have a sound track? No-one else could hear this 'voice'......

Oh, that's not good. In fact it is very bad. They iz now hearing voices on their forum

crazytony wrote:

bb1 wrote:PS:

have you missed out how she made a snide remark about PM in her sniggering cunning little voice

Since when did forum posts have a sound track? No-one else could hear this 'voice'......

Oh, that's not good. In fact it is very bad. They iz now hearing voices on their forum

Iz that schizophrenia, Tony, or what?

Don't they know they get more Hits when there is some interesting debate going on? And it makes them look more credible.
Any newcomer seeking information is going to have a fit when they see all that Banning in action.
Or do they just want a Forum totally devoted to Hating and Hounding The McCanns? And if so, isn't that Unconstitutional?

Meanwhile, I do not believe that Bennett doesn't understand. He is endeavouring to broadcast as much Libel as he possible can, under the protection of The Court, in the vain hope that some Tabloid will be stupid enough to print what he says. They won't. They are not protected by anything, and The Judge knows what Bennett is up to anyway.

lily wrote:

crazytony wrote:

bb1 wrote:PS:

have you missed out how she made a snide remark about PM in her sniggering cunning little voice

Since when did forum posts have a sound track? No-one else could hear this 'voice'......

Oh, that's not good. In fact it is very bad. They iz now hearing voices on their forum

Iz that schizophrenia, Tony, or what?

It's definitely some form of Madness. I don't even hear my own voice when I am posting. Probably due to the fact that I don't feel motivated to talk to myself.

I'll say it is, Sabot. So schizoid it is.....

Look at Sangfroid forum, which allowed both parties on there. At the time, it went well, then obviously the ego maniacs went off on there own to form Haverns. Then Haverns lot came over to attack the Sangfroid members.
Since then it is still the same old Havern members on that site, despite the numbers, which are socks.