Bennett already going back on promise he made on BBC Television

muratfan wrote:If you go on my members only blog, you will fund all the recent postings by Bennett in his Admin area... Quite libelous as well. We ate collecting them all ready in time to send to people in the know

Good bit of work, MF!

Careful in the admin area though. Apparently it is being closely watched at the moment . Not closely enough though

muratfan wrote:Look at Sangfroid forum, which allowed both parties on there. At the time, it went well, then obviously the ego maniacs went off on there own to form Haverns. Then Haverns lot came over to attack the Sangfroid members.
Since then it is still the same old Havern members on that site, despite the numbers, which are socks.

Think your timeline's a bit off, mf - sangfroid was well before not-Bennett's site.

MM was founded by the Sky lot, when 3A folded they went to MM, then MM threw Bennett out, and not-Bennett's site was born....

Maggs wrote:

muratfan wrote:If you go on my members only blog, you will fund all the recent postings by Bennett in his Admin area... Quite libelous as well. We ate collecting them all ready in time to send to people in the know

Good bit of work, MF!

Careful in the admin area though. Apparently it is being closely watched at the moment . Not closely enough though

No, they are not being careful enough.. I am even giving them clues as to who I am.. And in case they want to know...I AM A VERY RESPECTED POSTER ON THERE do your RESEARCH

muratfan wrote:

Maggs wrote:

muratfan wrote:If you go on my members only blog, you will fund all the recent postings by Bennett in his Admin area... Quite libelous as well. We ate collecting them all ready in time to send to people in the know

Good bit of work, MF!

Careful in the admin area though. Apparently it is being closely watched at the moment . Not closely enough though

No, they are not being careful enough.. I am even giving them clues as to who I am.. And in case they want to know...I AM A VERY RESPECTED POSTER ON THERE do your RESEARCH

OMG!! Your not Bennett, are you??

Nah, he's yoyo. Well, you didn't think anyone could be as stupid as that naturally, did you?

muratfan wrote:Look at Sangfroid forum, which allowed both parties on there. At the time, it went well, then obviously the ego maniacs went off on there own to form Haverns. Then Haverns lot came over to attack the Sangfroid members.
Since then it is still the same old Havern members on that site, despite the numbers, which are socks.

That was really sad, MF, but it wasn't just The Havern crowd. 3As had a lot to do with that. As did Brenda. But I guess that The Chimps knew by then that they were wasting their time. We did try.

lily wrote:

crazytony wrote:

bb1 wrote:PS:

have you missed out how she made a snide remark about PM in her sniggering cunning little voice

Since when did forum posts have a sound track? No-one else could hear this 'voice'......

Oh, that's not good. In fact it is very bad. They iz now hearing voices on their forum

Iz that schizophrenia, Tony, or what?

Either that or they are psychotic psychic

Dear me, Bennett's cage sounds a bit rattled and his nerves touched....

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Tony Bennett Today at 11:26 am

6RB, with whom some on here wanted to 'debate', has gone on over the last 24 hours to register as:

7RB

then

8RB

then

9RB.

I think all may have been banned by now.

In his/her '7RB' persona, s/he wrote:

"So your understanding of freedom of speech does not include discussion. You merely accept what Tony Bennett claims as gospel and ban all dissent. There was nothing malicious about my posts. There was a list of people included among those seventeen pages. Tony conveniently ignored that inclusion by saying it was not a list. No but it included a list.

I understand your cowardice in the face of facts which do not gel with your views. It is unfortunately not real freedom of speech though".

++++

I doubt if 6RB/7RB/8RB/9RB ever saw the 17-page list that was at Documents A116-A133 in my Bundle. If s/he had, s/he would know that there was NO LIST OF PEOPLE, as I've come on here before to explain.

The above post by 6RB/7RB/8RB/9RB...

* accuses this forum of banning all discussion

* accuses all forum members of 'accepting what TB says as gospel'

* accuses this forum of 'cowardice'

* makes once again an entirely false claim that my 17-page dossier included a 'list of people', and

* yet claims 'there was nothing malicious about my posts'.

+++++

Is there really a single member of this forum who really wants a liar like this to stay here and contribute?

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
candyfloss Today at 11:31 am

You forgot they came on before 9RB as 'Exasperated

------------

It's a pity they aren't so concerned about the rude, potty-mouthed yoyo, but then, he seems to be taking the role of Enforcer, attacking anyone who doesn't slavishly toe the party line.

So what was listed under the Sub Heading, FORUMS? Was it a list of Posts? Not much use without Names, I would say.

bb1 wrote:Dear me, Bennett's cage sounds a bit rattled and his nerves touched....

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Tony Bennett Today at 11:26 am

6RB, with whom some on here wanted to 'debate', has gone on over the last 24 hours to register as:

7RB

then

8RB

then

9RB.

I think all may have been banned by now.

In his/her '7RB' persona, s/he wrote:

"So your understanding of freedom of speech does not include discussion. You merely accept what Tony Bennett claims as gospel and ban all dissent. There was nothing malicious about my posts. There was a list of people included among those seventeen pages. Tony conveniently ignored that inclusion by saying it was not a list. No but it included a list.

I understand your cowardice in the face of facts which do not gel with your views. It is unfortunately not real freedom of speech though".

++++

I doubt if 6RB/7RB/8RB/9RB ever saw the 17-page list that was at Documents A116-A133 in my Bundle. If s/he had, s/he would know that there was NO LIST OF PEOPLE, as I've come on here before to explain.

The above post by 6RB/7RB/8RB/9RB...

* accuses this forum of banning all discussion

* accuses all forum members of 'accepting what TB says as gospel'

* accuses this forum of 'cowardice'

* makes once again an entirely false claim that my 17-page dossier included a 'list of people', and

* yet claims 'there was nothing malicious about my posts'.

+++++

Is there really a single member of this forum who really wants a liar like this to stay here and contribute?

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
candyfloss Today at 11:31 am

You forgot they came on before 9RB as 'Exasperated

------------

It's a pity they aren't so concerned about the rude, potty-mouthed yoyo, but then, he seems to be taking the role of Enforcer, attacking anyone who doesn't slavishly toe the party line.

I SAW IT AND IT IS REPRODUCED ON MY MEMBERS ONLY BLOG....SO BENNETT IS A LIAR AS USUAL All the names are there that he listed on that list.

muratfan wrote:

bb1 wrote:Dear me, Bennett's cage sounds a bit rattled and his nerves touched....

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
Tony Bennett Today at 11:26 am

6RB, with whom some on here wanted to 'debate', has gone on over the last 24 hours to register as:

7RB

then

8RB

then

9RB.

I think all may have been banned by now.

In his/her '7RB' persona, s/he wrote:

"So your understanding of freedom of speech does not include discussion. You merely accept what Tony Bennett claims as gospel and ban all dissent. There was nothing malicious about my posts. There was a list of people included among those seventeen pages. Tony conveniently ignored that inclusion by saying it was not a list. No but it included a list.

I understand your cowardice in the face of facts which do not gel with your views. It is unfortunately not real freedom of speech though".

++++

I doubt if 6RB/7RB/8RB/9RB ever saw the 17-page list that was at Documents A116-A133 in my Bundle. If s/he had, s/he would know that there was NO LIST OF PEOPLE, as I've come on here before to explain.

The above post by 6RB/7RB/8RB/9RB...

* accuses this forum of banning all discussion

* accuses all forum members of 'accepting what TB says as gospel'

* accuses this forum of 'cowardice'

* makes once again an entirely false claim that my 17-page dossier included a 'list of people', and

* yet claims 'there was nothing malicious about my posts'.

+++++

Is there really a single member of this forum who really wants a liar like this to stay here and contribute?

Re: Tugendhat's Committal Order and Directions for the Trial of Tony Bennett's Application
candyfloss Today at 11:31 am

You forgot they came on before 9RB as 'Exasperated

------------

It's a pity they aren't so concerned about the rude, potty-mouthed yoyo, but then, he seems to be taking the role of Enforcer, attacking anyone who doesn't slavishly toe the party line.

I SAW IT AND IT IS REPRODUCED ON MY MEMBERS ONLY BLOG....SO BENNETT IS A LIAR AS USUAL All the names are there that he listed on that list.

And what a list it is too, M-Fan. But did he really have to include their phone numbers?

What I don't get, MF, is that Bennett reckons there were around 30 of his rats in court. So how come none of them saw the list?
Also wasn't his McKenzie Friend Ms Sharon Lawrence, there. Or was she the one with the hearing aid problem?

What he says here though is true

Is there really a single member of this forum who really wants a liar like this to stay here and contribute?

I think we should get him banned, from the forum.

Good old 6789RB, will be back, with us soon, I'm sure

crazytony wrote:No doubt someone will correct me on this but, shouldn't Bennett remove the YouTube video about Madeleine from xxxxxxhttps://twitter.com/zampos
I believe, libel is still libel if repeated, even though he did not initially say what is written within the video?

And the YouTube video of Madeleine, has gone from his twitter page

Just leave them all to stew - they'll find out for themselves what the truth is. They are all in the grip of rampant paranoia at present, anyway.

They are absolutely convinced that The McCanns are going to be put on Trial sooner or later. What can you say to that sort of mindless stupidity? You certainly can't have a Debate about it.

There's absolutely NOTHING anyone can say to them that is going to bring them to their senses, Sabot, we can only shake our heads in wonderment at the depths of their delusion.

They're are bad as the smiffy fan club, who don't seem to have noticed that smiffy has gone stark, raving bonkers, and is doing a good imitation of those unfortunates who think newsreaders are sending them secret messages via the TV.

All Smiffy's Blog says is that he doesn't know anything, and never has, and that Team Gonc have been leading him up the garden path since day one.

And that he imagines that Clarence Mitchell has nothing better to do than rewrite material according to what legend in his own time smiffy has on his blog.

Meanwhile, in the real world -I doubt if Clarrie has even heard of him.

They all seem to be in the grip of some bizarre delusion, where they're Troofseekers, and not just a bunch of nasty, obsessive stalkers with mental health 'issues'.

and is doing a good imitation of those unfortunates who think newsreaders are sending them secret messages via the TV.

That reminds me......do you remember Laffin had that problem?

OOOO someone point me in the direction of MF's blog so I can have a look at the names on it............do I have to join up for it?

Well christ on a bike, if they think they aren't going to be heading in the same direction as TOne after being exposed to the Judge and the police like that, they are thicker than I thought.

And for Tone to sit there and pretend he isn't dragging as many down as he can with him makes me think he could give Pinocchio a run for his money with his adoring fans.

rhodes wrote:Well christ on a bike, if they think they aren't going to be heading in the same direction as TOne after being exposed to the Judge and the police like that, they are thicker than I thought.

And for Tone to sit there and pretend he isn't dragging as many down as he can with him makes me think he could give Pinocchio a run for his money with his adoring fans.

Makes good reading doesn't it, Rhodes?

How can that lying git, say he didn't give that info to the court. A few surprises there too.

Maggs wrote:

rhodes wrote:Well christ on a bike, if they think they aren't going to be heading in the same direction as TOne after being exposed to the Judge and the police like that, they are thicker than I thought.

And for Tone to sit there and pretend he isn't dragging as many down as he can with him makes me think he could give Pinocchio a run for his money with his adoring fans.

Makes good reading doesn't it, Rhodes?

How can that lying git, say he didn't give that info to the court. A few surprises there too.

I was amazed when he gave that list to the court, and even mentioned someone by name! Opened up a can of worms with that IMHO!! LL

They didn't think he would take all this alone, did they? Talk about gullible.

So much for their great martyr