Gonzo Shoves His Oar Into PJ/Yard Investigation

   

۞Ξ۞Ξ۞Ξ۞Ξ ‏@Bishop_Basher
Amaral:
"It is logical to find Madeleine's DNA in the home, but  not in a car rented more than twenty days after her disappearance"

Quite. So why did the Great Co-Ordinator persist in talking ghoulish bollox about something which didn't exist? Any normal police officer would have ensured he knew what he was talking about before launching a vendetta based on ignorance and incompetence.

I am sure a Portuguese forensic scientist would have been delighted to explain that 'Madeleine's DNA' was not in the hire car.

'McCann DNA' was - hardly surprising when so many members of the McCann family had been using it.

Just think of the grief Gonzo would have saved himself if he had bothered to do even the most basic reading on the subject. Though its amazing how many of his groupies still cannot grasp the DNA non-results, however many times it is explained to them.

Worth a re-read:

A copper without shame: Maddie's top detective blames everyone but himself for the lack of answers

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1038715/A-copper-shame-Maddies-detective-blames-lack-answers.html#ixzz2iUebjdKP
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

He's managed to blame lots more people since then - junior police officers, Rebelo, all sorts.

It takes character to admit gross failure. Amaral has not done this in print. Instead, he petulantly dresses it up as a conspiracy against him while, without any hard evidence, placing blame on those who were hurt most.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1038715/A-copper-shame-Maddies-detective-blames-lack-answers.html#ixzz2iUfHmw2m
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Haven't read that in ages. Thanks Bonny.

Where to start........this bit.

Amaral was clearly uncomfortable about the investigation's international profile, and perturbed that senior British politicians, such as Gordon Brown, had shown interest.

This is understandable, for he was a provincial policeman. Yet in his book, he interprets such political involvement as a sign of forces at work beyond his control.
But wasn't this simply the case of a man out of his depth and looking for excuses?

It is obvious that he was clearly out of his depth. Too bad that they didn't replace him with Rebelo much sooner.

Re: Where could "Smith-man" have been heading? (OR: Was there ever a "Smith-man"?)
Post Châtelaine Today

It would be interesting to see the records of the night creche.
Are they available?
Does anyone have a link for me?

*sigh*

No, they don't.

Because Gonzo didn't bother his backside to check the night creche records.

Gonzo didn't bother to look at the most obvious reason for men to be carrying children. Gonzo decided instead that Jane Tanner was lying as part as some vast, ridiculous conspiracy, when in fact she was telling the truth.

We don't yet know who Gonc is going to blame for the records not being checked; he certainly won't take responsibility.

Nasty, nasty post from some Gonc groupy caught here:

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t264p90-paranoia-heaven-part-deux-punchups-galore

ANOTHER BADLY TRANSLATED ITEM FROM A DELUDED MORON

......He was questioned about the new "robot picture" that the English police had, and his words where that it's not his case anymore, he no longer a police officer so he would not say a word. He has become a bitter man and revolted for they done to him.......

No-one did anything to Gonzo, he did it all to himself.

Oh, and nice LIE there. 'Would not say a word' indeed!

Who's this, then?


For Gonçalo Amaral, "there was a positive identification, which was set aside". "The McCann hired detectives who made a portrait, a man that resembled Gerry, in order to devalue the deposition", he concluded.

Pity his convictions are for defrauding his brother and perjury then, isn't it?

Pity his convictions are for defrauding his brother and perjury then, isn't it?

 Bonny, my sides hurt enough. Why do you do this?

               

How fascinating! Gonzo's still whining, blaming other people, smearing other people, telling outright lies and generally playing the martyr to get sympathy from his groupies!

Whatever happened to Justice works in silence? It seems to be feeling sorry for itself all over Portuguese tabloids now.

Oh, and hasn't he left it a bit late to play that fabled Ace? Self-pity and yet more falsehoods don't really qualify...

Incidentally, hysterical anti-McCann crap being whipped up by the likes of Morais and sources in the PJ is NOT going to be repeated here.

If the McCann-haters want to pretend it's autumn 2007 all over again, that's their problem. Other people don't have to legitimize it by wasting bandwith on bullsh*t.  

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t350-amaral-aka-lucifer-prince-of-liars

Quite; It's a wonder Gonc's nose isn't a yard long by now.

Incidentally, if the McCann-haters think they can hear laughter from behind the scenes at the sites which support Madeleine McCann and her family - they can.

Everyone is laughing at Gonc's latest display of self-serving invention, history rewriting and blame-shifting, and his complete inability to grasp what's important and what isn't.

Just like his fan club, he appears to be incapable of sorting chaff from wheat, and is so busy searching for wood, he fails, just like them, to see the trees.

Montclair
Jr. Member

Re: Latest news on madeleine

« Reply #121 on: Today at 12:48:46 PM »
Quote from: Benita on Today at 11:01:02 AM

an untrustworthy link at that ...you stalking me..

Despite what you think, Correio da Manhã has always been the best at reporting on the case.

Translation for non-haters:

CdM is the trashiest rag in Portugal, and happily prints any old rubbish from Team Gonc HQ, as long as it sells more copies. This is why Team Gonc uses it to release all its lies and bullsh*t from police sources.

How very dare anyone suggest it makes the Star look intellectual, and has earned its nickname Cart of Muck?

first of all, Cdm is not the best, how many times have I wrote comments showing my disagreement with antis and the newspaper have not allowed my comments which are against nasty comments.

You know what these deluded fools are like, they've believe any old rubbish as long as they can tell themselves it hurts Madeleine's family. They wouldn't know the truth if it bit them on the bum.