LATEST ON BENNETT'S LIBEL HAT TRICK

Ah but, HB....suppose this does go the full nine yards Bennett does get sent to prison for contempt...and still carries on when he's out?
Then back to prison he will go.
He has to stop, and NOW.

He really is staring ruin in the face.

Some sock or other has turned up on Bennett's forum to say:

I'm sorry, I haven't kept up with the case and with everything that's been going on lately. So please excuse me if I ask stupid questions.


1.If what you wrote about Kennedy and Smethurst is the truth, I don't understand how they could make you remove the articles. And apparently removing posts and articles isn't good enough for them. What more can they ask for? Five key demands?

2.You are the Secretary of the Madeleine Foundation, right? The articles about Kennedy appeared on the website, so how can Kennedy claim libel damages from you? You didn't write the articles, did you? So imo he should claim damages from the Foundation, not you. Or the chairperson (I haven't got a clue who that is nowadays).

3.Did you contact Kirvan, Kirwan? After all they are familiar with the case and if I remember correctly they gave you a much better price at the time.

And lets not forget : Good always concurs evil, just as water concurs fire.


A few points.


1. If what you wrote about Kennedy and Smethurst is the truth

The problem being simple - IT ISN'T TRUE.

Bennett and others were told that, and chose not to listen. Remember?

Not only are these grotesque allegations highly defamatory of our client, they are entirely untrue

Because of Bennett, these disgusting falsehoods were spread everywhere. I do hope Bennett appreciates that the filth posted elsewhere by assorted hydras and trolls was all recorded for possible use against him.

So, no, removing the offensive material is not good enough; it's way, way too late. I do hope Bennett thanks the Rothley troll, the TDH troll, and a few others for giving him no chance of defending himself.

2. It is being suggested elsewhere that 'HFS' is yet another Bennett sock - notice how the sock is trying to drag other Houndation members into it and blame them for what is on the site.

This would be a very good time for any remaining Hounders - and Havern herself - to head for the hills, because Bennett is going to try to drag them all down with him.

3. Kirwan's? I think they had more than enough of Bennett last time.

And the only advice any attorney is going to give is STOP IT NOW AND GROVEL.

Doncha love the mangled Bible quote:


And lets not forget : Good always concurs [sic] evil, just as water concurs [sic] fire.

a. Bennett is the one doing the evil deeds, so let's hope so.

b. Try throwing water on an electrical or oil fire and you will find out the error of that statement.

I don't think Bennett quite sees it like that, Bonny. I am convinced that he has a derangement of the brain that makes him The Hero David, fighting Goliath. If not Jesus Christ himself.

Sad to say that even taking his money is doubtful. Mrs. Bennett has some stake in this, so getting his money could take longer than it might appear. I know that she is entitled to half of the house, and no doubt half of his savings as well. So her interests will have to be considered legally. She will be entitled to time to realise the full value of their joint assets.

And then there is always his poor mother who appears to be worth a few bob. Allegedly.

Sorry if this is putting a damper on instant retribution. But it ain't going to happen. So no point in pretending otherwise.

Sabot, never mind about retribution, think about the legalities. His mother is irrelevant, frankly, as irrelevant as the mothers of grown adults who thumb their noses at the law always are.

Forget about Mrs B too - unless she was writing his posts for him, she is irrelevant, and the courts will see her rights are protected.

The point is - BENNETT HAS NO DEFENCE. He knows full well he was posting disgusting lies about Ed Smethurst and others, hence the speed at which the filth was removed.

No lawyer is going to advise him to fight this; he will be advised to concede, apologise and make restitution.

If, after any court decision, he carries on flouting the law, he will be jailed for contempt - he is in danger of that happening anyway.

There is also the matter of the criminal complaints of harrassment.

Bennett's wife and mother are pretty irrelevant, in fact - thankfully, the law will have more concern for his wife than he has ever shown.

http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=f86b120cfec98627

Bennett believes he is right even when he is wrong.
Unfortunately, the English libel laws say different.
Eta: why does he think foreigners prefer to sue in the English courts?

zamposAnthony Bennett

@Eglantine Noted. I study alleged cover-ups #Barrymore #McCann, Lee Balkwell, I need 2 talk 2 Morgan family ASAP
Note he has another grieving family in his sights?

crazytony wrote:Bennett believes he is right even when he is wrong.
Unfortunately, the English libel laws say different.
Eta: why does he think foreigners prefer to sue in the English courts?

IMO, he is way beyond wrong on this, Tony; particularly as regards Ed Smethurst, he has actually been making stuff up.

Let us not forget, the Kennedy family let him off once before, after he made those sick posts about them on the old 3A.

3A may be no more, but screenshots of those posts still exist, though they are too libellous and disgusting to ever see light of day.

And how did Bennett repay the Kennedys? By hiding in their shrubbery and taking photos of their security system 'for the family album'.

If some black kid from a sink estate did that, they would be in jail before they knew it. Why should Bennett be treated differently because he is a white man in his sixties?

crazytony wrote:zamposAnthony Bennett

@Eglantine Noted. I study alleged cover-ups #Barrymore #McCann, Lee Balkwell, I need 2 talk 2 Morgan family ASAP
Note he has another grieving family in his sights?

He has to be stopped, before he spreads any more cruelty and misery, IMO.

ETA

http://regretsandramblings.com/2011/09/13/the-morgan-family-warning-bennett-alert/

I know he's got no defence, Bonny. Even if he thinks he has.

But I was referring to the fact that his joint assets cannot be immediately liquidated as his wife is not irrelevant in that matter, and he knows it. She has to be given fair time to sell the house for a reasonable price, presuming that this would be necessary. And the same applies to the savings if they are tied up in stocks and shares. I know this because I have seen it happen, and it took several years.

Of course they will get him in the end, if his punishment amounts to a monetary penalty. But it's a bit like Gonc and him Appealing to whatever Court that will listen. It can be dragged out for some time.

Anyone needing advice on this issue, PM me. Bennett need not apply.

bb1 wrote:

crazytony wrote:zamposAnthony Bennett

@Eglantine Noted. I study alleged cover-ups #Barrymore #McCann, Lee Balkwell, I need 2 talk 2 Morgan family ASAP
Note he has another grieving family in his sights?

He has to be stopped, before he spreads any more cruelty and misery, IMO.

ETA

http://regretsandramblings.com/2011/09/13/the-morgan-family-warning-bennett-alert/

Do you know Bonny, I hadn't thought of it before; but you are correct when you use the word cruelty. Bennett is a very cruel man.

I have never, ever forgotten him taunting and sneering at Lee Balkwell's widow on Raptors, Tony. Now, the poor woman should not have had to challenge him like that to begin with, but the sadism with which Bennett sneered at her will stay with me forever.

Bennett thought his right to interfere came before her child, and her child's right to be protected from the likes of Bennett.

Tell you, Satan has a special seat reserved for Bennett.

Anyone willing to give a gnome a home?

NO!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've got enough trouble with the Evil Leprechaun.



Bennett should never have cloned Seamus....

bb1 wrote:NO!!!!!!!!!!!!

I've got enough trouble with the Evil Leprechaun.



Bennett should never have cloned Seamus....

bb1 wrote:http://thehoundingofthemccans.blogspot.com/?zx=f86b120cfec98627

Love those animal faces.

It never rains but it's a monsoon for the Hounders:


Brian Kennedy's five demands
Tony Bennett Today

HFS wrote:


If what you wrote about Kennedy and Smethurst is the truth, I don't understand how they could make you remove the articles. And apparently removing posts and articles isn't good enough for them. What more can they ask for? Five key demands?.


I am restricted in what I can say at the present time, but I think I can set out what Brian Kennedy's 5 demands are:

1. Remove 10 named articles from The Madeleine Foundation website which he says are libellous of him [it would probably be wise of me not to say on here in what way he says they libelled him] AND 'use my best endeavours' to ensure so far as it is within my power to ensure that if they have appeared on any other site on the internet, that they are removed from there as well [NOTE: The 10 'offending' articles were removed from our website within hours of my becoming aware of Kennedy's objections]

2. Examine all other articles and publications on our website to see if any others might also libel him, and remove those as well, and 'use my best endeavours' to remove them from any other website where they might appear [NOTE: This is being done]

3. Provide Court undertakings not to repeat the same or similar allegations

4. Publish an apology and correction to Mr Kennedy, 'the terms to be agreed in advance by him', and

5. To pay Mr Kennedy libel damages which he promises to donate to the Find Madeleine Fund.

bb1 wrote:

5. To pay Mr Kennedy libel damages which he promises to donate to the Find Madeleine Fund.[/b]

Oh Bennett donating to The Find Madeleine Fund

He's going to be doing it one way or another, muratfan, if he has any sense he will STOP THIS now and cut out the middleman, as suggested:

http://jatyk.blogspot.com/

I even suggested a law firm who may well feel he fits their client base:

muratfan wrote:

bb1 wrote:

5. To pay Mr Kennedy libel damages which he promises to donate to the Find Madeleine Fund.[/b]

Oh Bennett donating to The Find Madeleine Fund

We could see that happening mf, you would have thought Bennett might have before doing what he did.

I wonder if Mr Smethurst intends on doing similar?

muratfan wrote:

bb1 wrote:

5. To pay Mr Kennedy libel damages which he promises to donate to the Find Madeleine Fund.[/b]

Oh Bennett donating to The Find Madeleine Fund

Now that is a bonus worth waiting for.

The libelfest continues on Bennett's forum; I am not repeating all of it, but one of them wants to know:

Has ******* taken responsibility for his 3 Facebook friends yet? We haven't forgotten.

What 'friends' would that be, then? Has it still not sunk in?

Not only are these grotesque allegations highly defamatory of our client, they are entirely untrue

PS - on the subject of Facebook - why has Gonc got the worst scum of the internet as HIS FB friends?

There is no doubt about that one - the haters cannot help boasting about it.

Taken responsibility for his 3 Facebook friends yet

Er....... If Bennett chooses the defense option, he will have to explain to the court his proof that what he has stated is the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

The people on Hellhole must really hate Bennett's guts because if that is the caliber of people helping him, then what can you say?