LATEST ON BENNETT'S LIBEL HAT TRICK

Notice he is doing this again, LL?

your client was aware of my postings about him in May but did not act until August, and took no action to bring his concerns to me before then

He actually pretends he thinks it is up to the VICTIM to stop him libelling them; he's tried this before when he has been abusing people.

bb1 wrote:Notice he is doing this again, LL?

your client was aware of my postings about him in May but did not act until August, and took no action to bring his concerns to me before then

He actually pretends he thinks it is up to the VICTIM to stop him libelling them; he's tried this before when he has been abusing people.

He's quite unbelievable isn't he? he may find this time that people are going to be far tougher and less likely to let him apologise etc. LL

bb1 wrote:Am I reading this correctly? Bennett is intending to defend himself - possibly because no law firm would touch this with a ten-foot bargepole?

Oh I'm sure he would be able to find legal representation, but I imagine he has been told he will lose?

Bennett needs a licence for his GAD Leafleting Day

Do I need a licence to hand out leaflets?

Although the production and distribution of leaflets is enshrined in the Human Rights Act 1998 there are a number of restrictions (both legal and commercial) you should be aware of.

In April 2006 the government introduced the ‘clean neighbourhood and environment act. This gave local authorities new powers to impose restrictions on the handing out of leaflets and many UK cities and towns, such as Nottingham, Newcastle and now Sheffield are using these powers to both restrict the distribution of flyers and at the same time raise revenue. For example, anyone wishing to hand out flyers in Sheffield City centre will have to apply for a permit, costing £75pa (or £50pm) or risk a fine up to £2,500.

Don't tell Bennett, he thinks laws don't apply to him, Tony. Why he doesn't just go and shout at Speakers' Corner with the rest of the legally-tolerated loonies, I do not know. It isn't as if he has anything useful or interesting to say.

I wonder how much he really makes off the leaflets, booklets, membership dues and so on?

I've just posted on another thread about that Tony.

Bring on the dancing leprechauns.

Anyway, you have an attorney, not a lawyer, Tony. I expect he was hassling that Irish guy again

You know, I've got loads of their cr8p in screenshots
Does Hyland really want a reporter sniffing round him

From his panicky tweeting, it sounds like he already has, Tony.

Latest:

Re: Contempt of court - or not? Tony's two replies to Carter-Ruck
Tony Bennett Today

Tony Bennett wrote:
UPDATE ON THE THREE LIBEL ACTIONS

I see it's two weeks and two days since I last provided forum members with an update on the situation with the three libel claims against me, so here goes:

SMETHURST

DR GERALD MCCANN AND DR KATE MCCANN/HEALY

BRIAN KENNEDY


I see it's another two weeks and two days since I last gave an update. The news to date is:

SMETHURST

The only real development is that today I received a Court Order, dated 7 October, in the following terms:

QUOTE

Upon the Court's own initiative, it is ordered that:-

1. There will be a Costs Budgeting and Case Management Conference list for 7th December at 2.30pm, time estimate 1 hour 30 minutes.

2. Correspondence with the Court is to be by 1st class post and not recorded delivery.

UNQUOTE

The order was made by Master McCloud (a lady, by the way) on Friday 7 October, was sealed (stamped with a High Court of Justice stamp) on Tuesday 11 October, and posted second class on Wednesday 12 October.

The only other development was that a kind supporter who had used something called a 'social networking serach engine' (never come across one of those before) was able to supply me with details of the current Facebook pages of Edward Smethurst and some of his friends.

DR GERALD MCCANN AND DR KATE MCCANN/HEALY

There has been no further correspondence since I reported 16 days ago on page 6 of this thread. That means it is now 63 days since I first heard from the McCanns. They have not yet issued an application for me to be committed for contempt of court. But it could well be in tomorrow's post.

BRIAN KENNEDY

In short, and without reproducing any of the correspondence on either side, there has been a further exchange of letters regarding Mr Kennedy's demands, culminating in a letter I have sent today in which, in effect, I have agreed to the vast majority of Mr Kennedy's demands, but not quite all of them. I posted elsewhere on this forum a list of 12 links where Carter-Ruck said some of the articles in dispute were still available to read. Most of these can no longer be viewed - and, as per my correspondence with Carter-Ruck, I continue to try to get all these links removed
.

=============

So, how much has he handed over? And he is STILL harrassing Smethurst - insanity.

Also in members' area

'social networking serach engine' (never come across one of those before)
I too confess I, have never heard of a serach engine. Must check up on that one.

He is openly stalking Mr Smethurst, Tony - the acts of a madman, IMO.

Very telling, Tony - Bennett making things up again, is he?

bb1 wrote:Very telling, Tony - Bennett making things up again, is he?

Well, it would appear so Bonny. If you look to the left of the search you will see who heads the list of searchers.

Top Users news4india247
10 khemso
6 thegeekgen
6 Hardlinemarxist ************
**************
6 creditnow
5 mashablemobile
5 mashable
4 FutureUSTech
3 twilight_site
3 mashablesocial
3

Silly, silly people.

bb1 wrote:Silly, silly people.

the search term used.

Top Keyword smccann
29
madeleine
24
lawyer
15
kennedy
12
brian
12
friends
12
peintre
12
john
11
rothleypillow
10
bennett
7

Top UsersLilemor1
5
Hardlinemarxist
5
GILLYSPOT
5
rose2812
4
GasparStatement
2
xklamation
1
mhajewskiWHS
1
Anorakaren
1
Bren
1
Pedro Silva
1

Top Hashtagsmccann
12
facebook
2
smethurst
2
paedophile
1
bennett
1
madeleine
1

My my, how very interesting, Tony!

bb1 wrote:My my, how very interesting, Tony!

Deleted original because of the obvious. They see filth where there is none

So what's he going to do if and when he's asked for the proof?

lily wrote:So what's he going to do if and when he's asked for the proof?

With hold Evidence?

If he can't provide it, he might have some serious problems, Sabot? Mr Smethurst is pressing forward.


SMETHURST

The only real development is that today I received a Court Order, dated 7 October, in the following terms:

QUOTE

Upon the Court's own initiative, it is ordered that:-

1. There will be a Costs Budgeting and Case Management Conference list for 7th December at 2.30pm, time estimate 1 hour 30 minutes.

2. Correspondence with the Court is to be by 1st class post and not recorded delivery.