Bushmeat Brown in new fit of carpet-chewing

lily wrote:Ahem.....Brown thought she had found her ticket to it on Fox.     

Once you get a bad reputation in the entertainment business (whether movies or TV) it is nigh on impossible to shake it off.  You have to have serious talent to be able to do it.  Guess who ain't got it?

I can hardly believe her self aggrandisement, Lily. Blowing her own trumpet doesn't go halfway to explaining her self importance. If she wasn't such a pillock no one would ever have heard of her.
Amaral and Bennett are of the same ilk along with Petermac.

Make a plonker of your self and win infamy and vainglory. Praise be to Karma.

I'm waiting to see if ANY of them ever have an original thought, or say something they haven't said a million times already.  

You may be waiting a while Bonny.   

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post248140.html#p248140

Quote from a review of Brown's Cleopatra book:

http://stopthemyths.prophpbb.com/post248140.html#p248140

Most of the book turns on Ms.Brown's arrogant assumption that she rather than those who were alive at or around the time of Cleopatra's demise knows more of the how and the why.Whole chunks of text by Strabo,Suetonius,Cassius Dio,Plutarch and others are quoted after which Ms.brown,who behaves throughout the book as an annoying know-it-all declares that they are all wrong.

    

That's her.           

She really does sound like a female version of Bennett.   

Yeah, how could those dead old Romans possibly know more about it than Bushmeat Brown, the world's worst 'profiler'?

.....because she knows. She just 'knows' Bonny.

She's not stubborn either......  

Oh dear, now Bennett's issuing orders to SUCCESSFUL authors. Someone should tell him the object of the exercise is to sell readable, interesting books, not market a cure for insomnia.

As for:


And finally my notes about what we have a right to expect from 'Looking for Madeleine':

No, actually, no-one has a RIGHT to expect anything. Especially not the tedious nit-picking, invention and libel so beloved of Bennett and his ilk.

As it's not compulsory to buy the book, if it doesn't appeal to the hounders and haters, then the remedy is in their own mucky paws.

Don't buy it.

No, actually, no-one has a RIGHT to expect anything. Especially not the tedious nit-picking, invention and libel so beloved of Bennett and his ilk.

I suspect he is very jealous that these respected authors will make a large amount of money by writing the quintessential book to date about this.

He's still droning on, trying to tell SUCCESSFUL people what they should be writing about.

this insane brown continues with her insanity.

bb1 wrote:He's still droning on, trying to tell SUCCESSFUL people what they should be writing about.

He does so want to be a member of the successful club. Since he's a failure he begs for attention from those who are members.

about "He does so want to be a member of the successful club", he could be a member of a lunatic asylum.

He is already, like the rest of the haters.

Oh dear. The hounders appear to have decided that, because Summers and Swan have no time for nonsense about the 9/11 planes being holograms, or beams from space, their book about the McCann case won't be worth reading...

Most sane people would regard that as a bonus, but hey ho! 'Sane' is a word rarely used about the McCann-haters.

insanity is the trademark of antis freaks.

Cannot believe the load of pure nonsense they have written about 9/11. They know nothing about how those buildings were built and nothing about airplanes either as their 'facts' are not facts at all.

That is why they get ridiculed and laughed at by the rest of us.

So, obviously since they dissed everything, we can now assume that the book will be a raging success.

I just found this when wandering around the internet:

http://www.debunking911.com/WTC7.htm

I confess, I hadn't realised there was a damned great hole in the side of Building 7, which the conspiraloons always fail to mention...

I won't pretend to understand all the technical stuff, but I don't think there is any mystery about why it collapsed. Neither do I put any weight on a TV anchor saying it had come down a few minutes before it actually did. TV anchors talk nonsense at the best of times, never mind when Armageddon has erupted in New York City.

It certainly did look bizarre seeing the building still standing on TV however, it had not been hit by airplanes. Those photos show the damage as it had progressed through Building 7.

One of the hounders posted the following...


Summers & Swan 9/11 views shows me that they have just agreed with the Official story which was pumped out by Fox TV etc for the sheeple. Most professional architects and engineers know the truth that aluminium planes and steel/concrete buildings don't behave like that. There was not one video of the planes live.

What a total load of BS. After the first plane hit and before the buildings fell, I contacted an Ivy League educated architect and engineer relative of mine as I watched TV. I was told, that as he knew how the buildings had been constructed, that they would pancake. They most certainly did.

I won't bother with the rest of the fiction.

Re: The difficult task facing ANTHONY SUMMERS & ROBBYN SWAN as they publish 'Looking for Madeleine', billed as 'the most definitive account possible' of the disappearance of Madeleine McCann
Post PeterMac Today

It's OK. Don't worry, The First World war did not really happen, it is just history books written by the people who control our lives,
WW 2 was also a massive propaganda exercise, no one really got killed. Nothing really happened. My uncle is alive and well and living in Holland
The photos of the bombed cities are all photoshopped . . .

The 737 400 on the M1 at Kegworth (that I attended for many days) was a plastic replica, and I am sworn to secrecy about the operation to take it to bits and put it back
in the Airfix box.
The grieving families of all the people who died - or who were supposed to have died ! ! - in each of these events have all been paid billions by the Illuminati
and have agreed never to reveal that their relatives are in fact live and well and living in a commune with Elvis and Jackson and . . . .

THIS IS DISGUSTING !

Dirtymac annoyed with the conspiraloons. Now he knows how the rest of us feel about him and his kind, spending day after day making vile allegations about total strangers and accusing innocent people of heinous crimes - all the while pretending they are 'debating.

the pervert brown with her own insanity, brown, you stink.

Bennett, of the new book:


A kind colleague has ordered the book from Amazon for me and I hope to get it on publication day and review it for the forum.

Unless PeterMac gets there ahead of me, that is..

What's stopping him putting his hand in his pocket and buying his own copy? He needn't bother pleading poverty, he was full of talk about his summer hols not long ago.

He is seriously a miser and I think we have all witnessed this during the past few years. Remember Debs said that he never parted with his money when they went out on their jolly hounding jaunts.

Will never forget him writing on the 3As that people had sent virtual flowers to his wife. He posted that she spoke wistfully wishing they were real. Anyone could see what he was doing but I wondered why on earth he didn't buy some for her. Heaven knows she must deserve something after all he must put have her through.

So he is going to review it for The Forum. And some plonker will put that up on Amazon.