Mail: Internet troll who targeted McCanns found dead in hotel room

annaraccoon wrote:My betting is that her computer will also hold 'Justice for Hollie Greig' yada, yada, yada, and several yards of 'you're a child abuse supporter' ready to be cut and pasted onto suitable Twitter feeds. Could be several metric, not sure if they still use yards....I tracked one for several days in connection with another story who started Tweeting at precisely 7am every morning, and stopped at precisely 7pm every evening - in between she tweeted at approximately two minute intervals - I defy any normal individual being able to do that unless they were loading Twitter from some sort of ticker-tape machine...they are.seriously.insane.

and wifi in the privy

and wifi in the privy


I would say that's a necessity when spouting sh*te for so many hours.

DING DING DING!

How funny! The imbecilic, sex-obsessed conspiraloon Textusa has now decided it is an expert on the inquest system of England and Wales, and as usual, come out with a load of p*sh - including this gem of madness and delusion:


Unless Brenda Leyland identified herself clearly in one of her tweets, someone, somehow, somewhere, went to the trouble of identifying the pseudonym and passed this information to Martin Brunt. This implies to us, a crime of violation of privacy – for some reason Daily Mail held “identities” for legal reasons in the picture above.

Again we ask, what is the British justice system going to do about it?


Absolutely nothing. Because if the fool had been paying attention, it would know that Leyland DID use her real name in her earliest tweets.

She also used her real name on Facebook when she was posting hate and lies about the McCanns.

If the fool had bothered to read all Leyland's tweets, it would know that she had been hassling EVERYONE by email - Leicester police, Operation Grange, the Portuguese media - and Martin Brunt.

Maybe it thinks people sign emails 'Sweepyface'? Hard to tell, with such deluded, worm-filled 'minds'. But it is so, so typical of haters to engage keyboard without putting brain in motion, and go off on 50,000 word rants while ignoring key FACTS.

As usual, it's hard to believe dirtymac was ever a real policeman:


Re: Reading through the archive of Brenda's tweets
Post PeterMac Today at 8:47 am

If you are able to collate them in a readable form, you might consider sending a copy to

Senior Coroner for Leicester City and South Leicestershire...etc.

What on earth for? Doesn't he know that almost the first thing the REAL police would do is sieze Leyland's computer/s and phone records?

They can see for themselves the vile stuff she was posting, about the McCanns and others.

I don't think they grasp just how much hater dirty washing is about to be aired in public. The inquest is going to open floodgates all right - but it's the haters that are liable to be swept away.

Or maybe they are so far gone in sickness and hatred that they don't even realise how nasty and deluded Leyland's internet postings appear to normal, decent people?

Cristobell Author ‏@RosalindaHu 3
@jontait42 @winnower1 @MontiesPython Huge well done and thank you to those who collated info for Coroner, he can't ignore it. #mccann

Yes, she can, actually. It is very likely that she will file it in the special, round cabinet, as she has prima facie evidence - Leyland's own computer/s - which rather makes internet he said - she saids, well, irrelevant.

They really should stop jumping to conclusions and ignoring inconvenient truths - like Leyland's life ending on her ESTRANGED son's birthday.

It seems that morons such as Sonia Poulton and Rosalinda Hutton need to be reminded of the actual facts about Brenda Leyland. She was NOT A SAINT.

She first came to notice when Martin Brunt asked her a QUESTION. Yes - to Sonia Poulton - that is what he did. He legitimately (according to you) asked her a QUESTION. He asked her to explain her abusive tweeting. Her response was that she was ENTITLED to tweet what she liked.

Brunt tells us that she didn't seem to feel so ENTITLED after reflection and that she was hopeful that her actions would not land her in trouble with the POLICE.

One indisputable fact is that she exposed herself to the media by originally using her own name as the ID for her Sweepyface account. That made it easy for Brunt to track her down as she is the only Brenda Leyland in the area she made it clear she was tweeting from.  You really don't need to even consider the kind of TWADDLE that Sonia Poulton tweets about ISPs and IPs to have got her address. 192.com is your friend when tracing idiots who post abuse using their own names. Just about everybody posting on the ANTI MCCANN FACEBOOK pages can be traced just as easily.  And yes, Brenda Leyland, was using FACEBOOK as well as TWITTER.

We know Brunt did nothing wrong. He simply asked the woman a QUESTION and very properly told her that her abusive tweeting about the McCanns and witnesses could mean she was being investigated herself. As Sonia Poulton keeps reminding us at the moment, it is the ROLE of the journalist to ASK QUESTIONS of people, to GET ANSWERS from people. And as we say on the video Martin Brunt was far more POLITE in his questioning than Sonia Poulton ever is. Just because he asked questions of an ANTI MCCANN OBSESSIVE does not mean that he did anything wrong, though in their very peculiar minds that kind of QUESTION seems not to be allowed.

Another indisputable fact is that she was absolutely and pathetically OBSESSED by the McCanns and that, as Sweepyface, she posted abusively about them. Witnesses also claim that she was wont to visit Rothley and hurl abuse around when doing so.

We also know for certain that she was interfering in the case by abusing and stupidly taking part in the EXPOSING of a witness but as with all Anti McCanns getting things arse over elbow and actually linking the witness in the ONGOING INVESTIGATION to an account that had nothing to do with her. Yes, Brenda Leyland was just as stupid in her obsession and just as nasty as many others.

We know that Brenda Leyland was not just asking QUESTIONS. We can all read the ABUSE and NASTINESS that came from her keyboard. Maybe she felt she was ENTITLED to post her OPINION in that way but she went beyond just being NASTY and was actually INTERFERING in the INVESTIGATION with her attempts to intimidate a witness. FOR THAT ALONE, Brunt was right in his statement that she could have been investigated by the POLICE.

We know from Brunt that Brenda Leyland was worried about the consequences of her actions when they were pointed out to her.

We know from the frenzy of hate towards Brenda Leyland from the Anti-McCanns that she was not being supported by them. She was reviled by them, ridiculed  by them, made the butt of their jokes about how weak she was and how they would have given BRUNT what he deserved as answers (though we also know that so-called tough guys like the pathetic SEAN HYLAND from Scunthorpe were too cowardly to face Brunt).

We know there was one US nasty who threatened Brenda Leyland.

We know from a witness that Brenda Leyland left the village after being photographed openly by an unknown person (probably from the media).

We know that Leyland was estranged from one son whose birthday was apparently the day she died on.

We know that the POLICE will have seized her computers and will have examined them carefully for details of any suicide note or other clue as to her death.

We KNOW that the CORONER will know all of the above as FACT and will not need other pathetic OBSESSED individuals to tell her any of the above.

We all KNOW what happens to the CRAPOLA that the OBSESSED Anti McCanns send to SY. It is laughed at. We all KNOW the same will happen to the CRAPOLA that Winnower and others have collated OBSESSIVELY about this incident from Newspapers, TV and from Blogs. Such CRAPOLA is not what interests real detectives or real Judges or real Coroners. They don't play ONLINE SICKO OBSESSIVE GAMES like Winnower and Sonia Poulton and Rosalinda Hutton. The professionals deal with the real EVIDENCE from the real INVESTIGATION.

All the CORONER has to do is decide HOW Brenda Leyland died and what led to that death.  

So the real QUESTIONS are:

How did Brenda Leyland die? As we already KNOW the POLICE investigation has already suggested there are no suspicious circumstances it leaves, accident or suicide.

If it was an accident, what actually happened? Is there some kind of physical evidence which points to this? Toxicology? Position of the body?

If it was suicide what evidence supports that theory? Was there a note? What was her state of mental health? What led up to the death?

Could the reality of being legitimately exposed as a SECRETIVE and ABUSIVE online individual have led to her being unwilling to face family and friends because of the shame? Could the reality that she could be investigated by the POLICE for her OBSESSIVE nasty tweeting and her clear attempts to INTIMIDATE A WITNESS have led to her being unable to face the public or her family or her neighbours?

Could the fact that she died on the birthday of her ESTRANGED SON who she never spoke to anymore have a bearing on the matter? Was there a family issue which will only have come to light from proper INVESTIGATION by the POLICE and not from the ragbag of CRAPOLA found by assorted ANTI MCCANNS on Google?

And the final question. Will the assorted freaks and OBSESSIVES on #McCann actually accept the ruling of the CORONER or will she be lumped in with the POPE, JIM GAMBLE, GORDON BROWN, TONY BLAIR, GEORGE BUSH, the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, the QUEEN, JUDGE TUGENDHAT and everybody else as being IN ON IT?

Of course they won't accept the coroner's ruling, Greenink. The hounders will be straight onto the job, finding links and joining the dots. They will abusively use ancestry sites to trace the coroner's granny's blood group, and to find out if her great-uncle once removed was ever a Mason. Or a Knights Templar.

Bennett will start a petition demanding that the coroner's court be Investigated.

Meanwhile, in the real world, the media floodgates may well finally open - but it will be the haters and hounders that are swept away in the torrent, when the media finally gets a chance for payback for all the abuse, frequently obscene, they've suffered from the Amoral fan club over the years.

The haters and hounders are not going to like what they hear from the coroner one bit; they may even hear themselves blamed for egging a foolish woman on to ever more anti-social, vicious behaviour, instead of urging her to seek help from a mental health professional.

bb1 wrote:As usual, it's hard to believe dirtymac was ever a real policeman:


Re: Reading through the archive of Brenda's tweets
Post  PeterMac Today at 8:47 am

If you are able to collate them in a readable form, you might consider sending a copy to

Senior Coroner for Leicester City and South Leicestershire...etc.

What on earth for? Doesn't he know that almost the first thing the REAL police would do is sieze Leyland's computer/s and phone records?

They can see for themselves the vile stuff she was posting, about the McCanns and others.

I don't think they grasp just how much hater dirty washing is about to be aired in public. The inquest is going to open floodgates all right - but it's the haters that are liable to be swept away.

Or maybe they are so far gone in sickness and hatred that they don't even realise how nasty and deluded Leyland's internet postings appear to normal, decent people?

Not only doesn't he know how the Coroner's Court work, he doesn't know how to collate things 'in a readable form'.

It took me less than a couple of minutes to get all those tweets from Sweepyface into not only a "readable form" but one which could be searched, sorted etc.

Every time Pretendy Policeman Pete makes a post he shows just what an incompetent oaf he really is. A supposed senior cop might be expected to show some initiative or to have some computer knowledge but this chap has neither.

No-one who saw it will ever forget Pete's complete ignorance of custody law in England and Wales, and of Test Purchase law in England and Wales.

There have been a string of other incidents which have to raise questions about his claims.

A reminder for the haters and hounders:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6920&start=25

Re: Troll logic
Postby Jayelles » Fri Dec 05, 2014 5:28 pm

Quote, on the subject of Ms Leyand:



She was evidently distressed when one of her anti pals called her a "tw*t" a few weeks previously and was ignoring her
She and her pal Izzy were blamed for bringing the antis into disrepute by one of the anti leaders after they trolled an innocent young woman who is a witness in the McCann case and caused her to close her Twitter account
She was subjected to numerous cruel comments by several members of Haverns about appearance and also accused of being a plant
She was described by Pat Brown as "extreme and offensive" in a blog article (this was later revised and toned down after news of her death emerged)


All those trying to exploit her death for their own ends appear to have wiped all that from their memories. How odd!

Is it normal for ex-policemen to incite acts of violence at inquests?

e: Blacksmith
Post PeterMac Today at 10:45 am

ultimaThule wrote:

I venture to suggest that if Brenda had been been in possession of a pack of feral dogs and a shotgun it's highly unlikely Brunt would have turned up on her doorstep and, furthermore, if Brenda had been a Brendan he wouldn't have ventured anywhere near Burton Overy, with or without a cameraman, PeterM..
.
Quite so. Someone had done the research. Someone knew there was not a mentally unstable husband in possession of a shotgun on the premises . . .
It would be lovely to see the tables turned.
Perhaps someone at the inquest will do whatever is necessary outside !

I do hope someone warns Brunt that a seemingly mentally-disturbed Amaral supporter is trying to incite people to shoot him if he goes to an inquest into the death of another Amaral supporter.

PS - remarks from Amaral supporters like:

Someone knew there was not a mentally unstable husband in possession of a shotgun on the premises . . .
It would be lovely to see the tables turned.
Perhaps someone at the inquest will do whatever is necessary outside !

Make it crystal-clear why Sky went to such lengths to hide the identity of whoever that woman is - haters are clearly a danger to anyone that they decide is an 'enemy'.

As requested elsewhere...



I had already taken one - just in case.

Good. It really shocked me. My mouth fell open in utter disbelief. No wonder people are assembling Dossiers He must be unhinged. They must all be unhinged to tolerate that.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6920&start=25

Top
Re: Troll logic
Postby tigerloaf » Sat Dec 06, 2014 11:37 am

One thought comes to me from reading that post and it is something that the Police will without doubt consider as part of their enquiries.

A very large number of the numpties, haters and hounders openly acknowledge their own serious mental health and/or drug issues. One of the avenues of investigation will no doubt be whether Brenda Leyland was in fact being treated by any doctor for mental health issues; was she suffering depression, for example? Could such an illness have contributed not only to her death but to her obsessive attitude towards the McCanns?

Full, long post at link. And I would not be at all surprised if it is revealed that Leyland had 'issues' - many of the loudest haters very obviously do.

Sabot wrote:Good.  It really shocked me.  My mouth fell open in utter disbelief.  No wonder people are assembling Dossiers  He must be unhinged.  They must all be unhinged to tolerate that.

There's some sick stuff on that site - obscene photoshopping, vile invented 'theories' straight from their own sick heads. It's not surprising so many have fled to cleaner waters. They're still talking utter nonsense about the case, of course, but at least they're not adding obscenities, photoshopping and threats to stalk and harm people to the nonsense.

Like a good few of them, dirtymac seems to be becoming increasingly irrational, almost taking developments personally. That is, I guess, what comes of inserting yourself into matters that are actually none of your concern - who will ever forget his Ghoul Tour with Bushmeat?

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6920&start=25

Of the hounders:


What type of freak would even think to do this >>>>...... They have stolen from her Facebook page, an image of her son, to use as a banner for their hatred of the McCanns

They did indeed.

AND GOT HIS AGE WRONG BY TEN YEARS.

They know they are losing their insane vendetta, is the truth of the matter, so they have lost the final vestiges of reason. This is what happens to people who live their lives in a welter of suspicion when they get a tiny niggle in what is left of their brains, that they have all gone too far.
They kick out in a frenzy to keep everyone else on message so they won't be alone in their humiliation.

that bushmeat: totally insane.

Personally, I feel quite sad about Brenda. Totally abandoned by those who should have been supporting her.

I was thinking about it last night, and I would have offered a hand in spirit. But then I never did much care of what people think of me, even in support of those who don't agree with me.

Bless you, Sabot, I know you would. But she would have only turned on you and accused you of....whatever it is that goes on in their minds. I don't know if it is because they are such cruel people themselves, under all that faux-caring, but you can't help them, none of them.

Because that would mean them facing the truth about themselves, and none of them have the backbone to do that.

bb1 wrote:Bless you, Sabot, I know you would. But she would have only turned on you and accused you of....whatever it is that goes on in their minds. I don't know if it is because they are such cruel people themselves, under all that faux-caring, but you can't help them, none of them.

Because that would mean them facing the truth about themselves, and none of them have the backbone to do that.

I do know, Bonny, from past experience. Too much past experience, one might think. But I really cannot bear to see anyone in distress. I don't care who they are or what they have done.
This doesn't make me saintly. It is just the way in which I react. That poor woman must have been tormented within herself. And that causes me distress.
That I should ever have been so ashamed and so abandoned. It actually makes me feel ill. So I will always rather try and be rejected.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=6589&start=625

Top
Re: They LIE when they say they are not haters!
Postby urcrazy » Sat Dec 06, 2014 5:59 pm

*chuckle'

Yes, the conspiraloon fools have been providing fine entertainment over this.