Tick tocker in a frenzy over rather strange Times report on Leyland inquest

Hounder proves the point about hater morons:


Was eastenders reveal a tester for public opinion?
Post JUDGEMENT DAY Today
Any connection to the Mccann case?

Another idiot hounder - or Bennett sock:


Not sure it would be strictly 'safe' to say that because Sky are pleading protection from revealing the source that this means that there is 'something to hide', or rather that Sky are engaged in hiding it. It is standard practice. A point of principle. If Sky just cave and spill the beans now, no whistleblower will ever want to confide in them again. It's considered 'journalistic integrity'.

No, it's considered UK and EU law, fool.

Clearly another

I BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH BUT...

Hounder:


Why should the dossier compiler not be named? Everyone on the list should be able to demand that their accuser/s be named. What about their human rights?

Oh, the irony...

In that case, the McCann family, and every other person who has been on the recieving end of abuse, lies, fabrications and false allegations from Gonzo fans has the HUMAN RIGHT to demand the real names of THEIR accusers.

Every single hounder, every single FB sock, every single hatetwatter. Every last one of the hate squad, the Gonzo supporters that do NOT support genuine human rights in European democracies, do NOT believe in concepts like the rule of law and the presumption of innocence.

Every single one of the nutjobs that are incapable of grasping that the McCanns have been declared innocent of committing any crime by the legal systems, and police forces, of two western European nations.

Yes, it might be an excellent thing if every single one of the accusatory lynchmob that worships Gonzo was revealed to their victims.

Just one of the many Leyland tweets the haters are ignoring. Remember, she boasted about emailing Brunt some time before that.

516339051591643137|Sun Sep 28 21:29:57 +0000 2014|@RothleyPillow @PORTUGALONLINE #mccann I sometimes send their most outrageous ones direct to CM & Brunt

Haters still want to deny it was Leyland that contacted Brunt first?

The haters wanted people like Brunt to read their posts, links etc.    

They must have been thrilled when they saw she was tweeting him and that he in turn was then following her.  All was great until that didn't fit into their new storyline.   So they did what they always do.

Why should the dossier compiler not be named? Everyone on the list should be able to demand that their accuser/s be named. What about their human rights?

It sounds like they are really worried. If so, why? If they have a right to say it with the law on their side then no harm can possibly come.

Oh, we all know what they're like, and how they create their own version of 'reality', Lily. We know, from Leyland's own horrible tweets, and from what we saw play out on the TV screen, that events simply do not match their version.

Do they seriously think that Brunt didn't return Leyland's pleas for attention from him? When Laffinthug and one of those pervy, sicko photoshoppers stated that they had been approached by Sky, but refused?

They all commented on how UN-surprised Leyland was to find Brunt standing in the road outside her house, and decided she was IN IT.

All this is a matter of record, but they are frantically trying to turn it on its head, despite the fact that they know NOTHING about behind the scenes contact between Leyland and Sky. They know NOTHING about what her neighbours thought of all this. They know NOTHING about what her estranged UK family had to say about it.

Mind you, ignorance has never stopped them before.

I predict they are going to be absolutely unbearable when the coroner's court fails to follow the script they've invented in their empty heads.

We have seen this story too many times, Bonny, so we know you are right.

Have they got another Pied Piper in their sights yet?

Queen Sonya still seems to be the front runner, despite having gone into seclusion to 'concentrate on the documentary'. Whatever that means.

They are going to need a backup then.

Good points:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&t=7235&start=450

She felt safe and happy enough to invite him into her home so the antis are going to be disappointed if they think brunt is going to be accused of bullying leyland to death. Her interactions with brunt demonstrate she was not in distress due to brunt. What may have caused upset was the coverage his report received when it was aired several days later. But the coronor is not interested in speaking to whoever decided to run the story continually. Nor has she asked the met to speak about the dossier. The dossier of course being the publicly available comments of the antis so the author of the dossier was the antis. Someone just printed them off and handed them to the police.

Easy to be diverted from the fact that the authors of that 'dossier' were actually the haters themselves.

Of course they were which is why they are so upset.

There's thick, and then there's haters. This hilarious exchange was seen last night.


Ian Hitchings ‏@IamIanHitchings
#BrendaLeyland inquest. Coroner asks @skymartinbrunt to reveal source of #McCann #troll dossier. xxxxxxxxhttp://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=5476.msg220883#msg220883 …

Helen Baxtor ‏@Blamhappy
@IamIanHitchings So it was today. I hadn't realised.

Jasmine ‏@alfibab3
@Blamhappy @IamIanHitchings No the coroner was told source protected under Euro law has not made any further requests. #mccann

Liz Martin ‏@martin_liz
@alfibab3 @Blamhappy @IamIanHitchings now you are having a laugh He was told no such thing Please give me link to this #McCann

It's in the link, you frigging moron.


Leicestershire police wrote to Sky on behalf of the coroner, Catherine Mason, asking a series of questions including the identity of the person who was behind the dossier of tweets. Sky has said that it will protect its source, arguing that its rights are protected under European law. It is understood that neither the police nor the coroner have responded since.

Now, how difficult is it to understand that?

They're going to be heartbroken when they don't get fresh meat to tear to shreds, another family to stalk and abuse, someone new to be the target of the sickening obscenities the Gonzo fan club are so fond of.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=7098&start=775

Police investigate McCann trolls

Some excellent points, including:


The idea she was a gentile, fragile old lady expressing her doubts, who became a target for "pros" just couldn't be further from the truth. Her attacks on the McCanns and (some) of their supporters was often vicious. IMO blabbers etc are using sweepyface to ease their own consciences. I know it's been said many times now, but watching them use that woman's death publicly, for their own means is disgusting.

Quite. Leyland's tweets are horrible - the sadistic cackling, the foul language, the obscene inventions about all sorts of people. And she was anything but fragile, frequently boasting about how she was a bit of a jet-setter.

She certainly wasn't scared to email David Cameron and Uncle Tom Cobbley and all in her REAL name, as she boasted.

She also emailed Martin Brunt.

It'll all come out in court, no doubt.

Sadly, just another keyboard hero.  Utterly fearless in spewing bile when seated anonymously behind a screen.   Less brave when called out in "real life"

If one follows a rule "never say anything online that you would not say to the personal face" then all will be well.

If they admit that what she said and how she behaved was horrible then they will have to admit the same about themselves.

I do wonder if her internet 'friends' turning on her played a part in it, Jean-Pierre. Also, happy, well-balanced, pleasant people tend NOT to be estranged from their own families, as Leyland was. They seem to be in denial over that, and the fact that she died on her estranged son's birthday.

It is, I must confess, rather entertaining to watch the haters trying to rewrite history and alter reality. While blindly ignoring the facts that:

a. The real police know all about that 'dossier'.

b. The real police have had Leyland's computer/s since her death. The real police have first-hand evidence of her internet activities - and I don't envy them, having to wade through that bile.

It'll all come out at the coroner's court, I am sure.

Yes, her cyber friends did turn on her. Can't make head nor tail of that sort of mentality. One minute they were abusing her for not doing I'm not sure what, and the next they were sobbing and wailing over her corpse and blaming someone else.
How does that work, then.

It's quite simple, really. The so-called 'Truthseekers' are nothing but a lynch mob, and will turn on their own kind at the slightest excuse.

Lynch mobs always follow the same dynamics, whether in real life or on the internet.

bb1 wrote:There's thick, and then there's haters. This hilarious exchange was seen last night.


Ian Hitchings ‏@IamIanHitchings
#BrendaLeyland inquest. Coroner asks @skymartinbrunt to reveal source of #McCann #troll dossier. xxxxxxxxhttp://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=5476.msg220883#msg220883 …

Helen Baxtor ‏@Blamhappy
@IamIanHitchings So it was today. I hadn't realised.

Jasmine ‏@alfibab3
@Blamhappy @IamIanHitchings No the coroner was told source protected under Euro law has not made any further requests. #mccann

Liz Martin ‏@martin_liz
@alfibab3 @Blamhappy @IamIanHitchings now you are having a laugh He was told no such thing Please give me link to this #McCann

It's in the link, you frigging moron.


Leicestershire police wrote to Sky on behalf of the coroner, Catherine Mason, asking a series of questions including the identity of the person who was behind the dossier of tweets. Sky has said that it will protect its source, arguing that its rights are protected under European law. It is understood that neither the police nor the coroner have responded since.

Now, how difficult is it to understand that?

They're going to be heartbroken when they don't get fresh meat to tear to shreds, another family to stalk and abuse, someone new to be the target of the sickening obscenities the Gonzo fan club are so fond of.

That Liz Martin is even more moronic than you suggest. It seems she hasn't even read enough yet to realise that the Coroner isn't male. If she hasn't processed that rather basic piece of knowledge how can she ever be expected to understand the phrase 'European Law' never mind the ins and outs of the law itself? No wonder this country is plunging every day more deeply into debt when adults such as Liz Martin clearly cannot function properly in the real world.

They are hopelessly stupid, Greenink. This one's on that site the Sisterhood flounced off to when they fell out with Bennett:

. Given that the case against Brenda seemed pretty thin (no direct messages to the McCanns, no threats to them or their family, just a consistent disbelief of their version of events and a determination to repeat this view

Whoever wrote that clearly hasn't read the horrible things.

There were disgusting remarks directed to the McCanns - she imagined they were reading her bile. There were fantasies about assaulting Kate McCann and kicking Gerry McCann's teeth in - this, remember, from someone that lived close to them, and apparently was in the habit of going into Rothley itself to spew bile at anyone she could corner.

She was emailing all and sundry - INCLUDING BRUNT.

She used obscene language.

She cackled with sadistic glee because she thought she'd terrified a young woman, with her threats.

They really need to stop painting Leyland as some kind of pathetic martyr, and take a long, hard look at what she was doing.

And at themselves.

I wonder, if Brunt came into possession of information that would Crack the Case, as the haters so often fantasise....

But couldn't reveal what it was unless he had guarantees that his Source would be protected....

Would the hate squad still be demanding he ignore all those UK and EU laws that shield journalists and whistleblowers? Or would that be different?

Bonny, you shouldn't even ask because you know that that would be different. Guaranteed.

Exactly. We've all seen the Free Speach, Je suis Charlie brigade lining up to announce,

I BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH BUT....