Tick tocker in a frenzy over rather strange Times report on Leyland inquest

bb1 wrote:Exactly. We've all seen the Free Speach, Je suis Charlie  brigade lining up to announce,

I BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH BUT....

Sadly they dont see the difference between "je suis Charlie" et "je suis un Charlie"

Jean-Pierre.t50 wrote:

bb1 wrote:Exactly. We've all seen the Free Speach, Je suis Charlie  brigade lining up to announce,

I BELIEVE IN FREE SPEECH BUT....

Sadly they dont see the difference between "je suis Charlie" et "je suis un Charlie"

BA BOOM!

Back of the net, J-P!

Just a reminder of what the McCann-haters are trying to airbrush out:

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=115&t=7098&start=800


Leyland chose to vilify the mccanns continually throughout nearly every day for the last few years, she chose to travel to their home to vilify them to people in their village, she chose to lie about them, gloat at the idea they might be in pain, address spiteful tweets to their children, vilify anyone who stood up for them, vilify witnesses, spread malicious lies about a witness, gloat at the idea the witness was frightened due to the antis actions. She chose to repeatedly contact people like brunt and chose to say on camera that she was entitled to behave like this?

Precisely.

Someone on the hounders has the most bizarre notions about Murdoch and Sky - they don't even seem to know there is rather a lot more to the organisation than Sky News and Sky 1.

Arts ringing any bells? Atlantic, the drama flagship? Sports? Anything?

Whoever wrote that guff seems to forget the Prime Directive of the Murdoch, or any other commercial enterprise - making money.

Why, it's almost as if whoever wrote the guff hasn't had a TV set for decades.......

Shamefully, the Gonzo fan club is already trying to disrupt this - it's pointless expecting decent behaviour from them. The McCann-haters have also started that revolting photoshopping they're so fond of.