Bennett declares war, LOLOLOL

Maybe we should start An Important Petition to have the haters and hounders micro-chipped? The chips could send out WATCH OUT, THERE'S A STALKER ABOUT, alerts to innocent, unsuspecting members of the public.

I was about to suggest this but thought it might be Stalking. Imagine the laughs if Mr. Bennett had actually been tracked to that bush in Rothely.

He'd do well to pick up a book on English grammar and learn the meaning of simple words and phrases in English.

Some hounder:

Does anyone remember Fiona Phillips (she of ambassador status of Missing People and tv presenter) demonstrating wristbands with tracker devices to be placed on kids in case you lost them on a beach?

Nope. But I do remember the Portuguese police trialling them for use on crowded holiday beaches.

http://www.algarveresident.com/0-48359/algarve/child-safety-on-faro-beach

Child safety on Faro beach
Updated: 10-Aug-2012

A new programme has been launched on Praia de Faro to ensure children’s safety if they get lost or separated from their parents.

Named Estou Aqui (I’m Here), the campaign was launched last month by the PSP to help parents locate a lost child on Portugal’s beaches, thanks to a special identification bracelet.

Previously only available at PSP stations throughout the country after being requested online via a website purposely created for the Estou Aqui campaign, the bracelets are now available at Praia de Faro.

To subscribe to the campaign, parents visiting the beach can approach the on-duty lifeguards to collect the free bracelet, which carries a unique number and is then activated through the internet and registered on a confidential database operated by the PSP.

An innovative programme that is still in its experimental phase, the bracelets will be activated until September 15.

For more information, please visit https://estouaqui.mai.gov.pt

Looks like the Portuguese police are in on this dastardly scheme, too.

A gay policeman has been murdered in fairly horrible circumstances:

http://news.sky.com/story/1674678/tribute-after-police-officers-remains-found

So naturally, Head Hounder pricked his ears up at the word 'gay'. Head Hounder has decided that the fairly sketchy details in the media aren't sufficient for his stickybeaking, so has announced:


This can easily be sorted. I will ask the Met an FOI Act question as to where this meeting was held, when it started and finished, what the purpose was, and how much the cost of hiring the hotel was.

WTF for? What has yet another family's tragedy got to do with him? What possible relevance to his own life can any of this have?

In short - IT'S NONE OF HIS DAMNED BUSINESS.

Disgusting ghoul. IMO, lol.

He really must think that he is a very very important person so is entitled to all answers.

It's astounding that the Harlow Hounder actually imagines he is entitled to confidential information about an ongoing police investigation.

bb1 wrote:It's astounding that the Harlow Hounder actually imagines he is entitled to confidential information about an ongoing police investigation.

Poor old Bennett. How dare a mere policeman go somewhere fairly decent for breakfast? I actually use the 'ting' lounge at the Shangrila quite often when on 'tother side of the river so know it well. Breakfast is around twenty to twenty five quid a head but it's good and the views are spectacular. So a bit pricey but not particularly out of court for central London.

But I am not sure anyone would be able to explain that to the Harlow super sleuth. No doubt he will be outraged that a police constable has breakfast anywhere other than the local greasy spoon.

There is, IMO, something deeply unhealthy and unsavoury about Bennett. Not just the endless stickybeaking, but his fascination with gayness, and with squalid crimes.

To be honest, I have sometimes wondered about him and his er....obsessions.

The prurient delight he takes in discussing unsavoury matters - to say how much he disapproves, of course! - does rather raise eyebrows.

Well yes it does. I have to say that I am of the opinion that that is what perverts do.

bb1 wrote:The prurient delight he takes in discussing unsavoury matters - to say how much he disapproves, of course! - does rather raise eyebrows.

Quite, Bonny. It does rather.

Yet another hounder thinks it is entitled:


But we have the right to know if they have been preaching on thing publicly and doing something else privately.

"Back to basics" and "family values" springs to mind... Mr Major.... Ms Currie... and a whole host of others (members of the Royal Family).

These were people in positions of power and totally open to blackmail.

Freedom of speech, freedom of information... helps to make a free society.

If there are good reasons behind public exposure I'm all for it.

'Public exposure'? Disgusting little moralising prodnose!

The people concerned have NEVER lectured the rest of us about morals.

Which is why I paid no attention to the lurid headlines about them in the National Enquirer - it didn't interest me.

I was far more interested in the lurid headlines about the repulsive, hypocritical Ted Cruz, the godbothering, christian evangelist politician who is never done lecturing other people about their private lives.

Not unlike someone else I am sure we can think of ....

Mind you, the biggest surprise about godbotherer Cruz is that five women allegedly had sex with him willingly.

Another hounder:


If you act in a criminal way or in an immoral way, the fact you can be exposed should come to mind and curb unacceptable behaviour.
How far do standards fall in UK if bad or criminal activity can be hushed?

My opinion only but maybe I'm old fashioned as I believe conscience should play a large part in our actions.

hentie
Madeleine Foundation

Oh, and she thinks she's entitled to set herself up as judge, jury and executioner of other people's 'morals' does she?

I bet every single one of them is pawing excitedly through the Mail and other online media, in a frenzy of one-handed typing as they dribble about every alleged detail concerning the sex lives of the people involved.

To say how shocked they are, of course!

Incidentally, if anyone chooses to comment on the morals -or lack of them - of Hentie and the rest of the hounders, they will have nothing to complain about.

A great many people judge hounding and abusing the family of a missing child, and others, to be a great deal more immoral than what grown adults do with other grown adults.

Conscience seems to play no part in the actions of hounders, haters and forkers, after all.

As the haters and hounders seem to be indulging in a deeply hypocritical display of judgemental moralising, here's one bible quote they might like to remember:

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/chose-name-list-super-injunction-7724893#D1ZogMYhTof0yrU1.97

The Sunday Mail’s Scottish editions today identify the A-list couple at the centre of a super-injunction controversy.

They won a silencing order to stop press reports in England but the injunction has no force in Scotland.

As our digital content is read in England we cannot reproduce the story online, tell you who they are or even feature the front page.

But their names are already known in the United States where the stories have been published and their identities are all over social media.

In a leader, the Mail today makes clear why it is important to name the couple.

It is not about the stories they are trying to stop but the absurdity of trying to prevent a free press identifying them when the whole world already knows who they are.

The Mail said: “We are publishing the identities today because there is no legal reason not to publish in Scotland what has been banned in England and Wales.

“Their big secret is no secret at all. America knows. The internet knows. The whole world knows.

“So now Scotland knows. And so we should.”

There! Hounder Northern Branch can now satisfy their prurient curiosity about just who has been rolling around in olive oil, in paddling pools.

I cannot imagine what possible difference such knowledge will make to the hounders, but hey ho! They probably think olive oil is Sinful, or something, given their judgemental, narrow, worldview.

Many people regard stalking, smearing and abusing the family of a missing child, and taking a sicko hate campaign all the way to Downing Street:



as far more immoral than some foolishness involving paddling pools and olive oil. Many people would regard such a hate-fuelled crusade as downright criminal, and an affront to the rule of law and democracy.

I trust there is no jealousy involved.

I just don't know what goes on their heads, Lily, that they have the sheer gall to pretend to be oh, so superior to people caught up in this latest sex scandal, to give lectures about morals and consciences.....

When they are leading lights in the most vicious stalking and abuse of the family of a missing child, and others.

Who does the greatest harm to society? The idiots in the paddling pool....

OR THE LYNCH MOBBERS AND WITCHBURNERS?

OR THE LYNCH MOBBERS AND WITCHBURNERS?

Oh, you mean those who think, in their delusions, that they are superior to those they attack?

Quite, Lily.

OMG, the Sun isn't taking all this Sinning seriously! We're doomed!