Sky: PM At Risk Of "Betrayal" Over Press Regulation

http://order-order.com/2016/04/07/elton-john-packs-david-furnishs-bags/

They do there is a world outside McCann-hate? That there are all sorts of news stories out there, that don't have the word 'McCann' in them?

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1315p50-cristobell-hutton-s-latest-hate-filled-ramblings-part-3

Dear me, Cupid Stunt really is obsessed with the McCann family.

bb1 wrote:Andrew wrote:
Heisenburg wrote:
According to the Mail the press are already gagged.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3528161/DAILY-MAIL-COMMENT-right-know-Court-Appeal-ruling-banning-British-press-naming-cheating-married-celebrity-draconian-unfair-public.html

Anyone on here who is American and can tell us who this celeb couple is....

Oh, for goodness sake! Are the Truthseekers incapable of looking at a US web site and finding out for themselves?

Here's a candle in the wind for them - it doesn't involve women.

Not even Kate?

OMG. It's not Elton, is it? Poor soul. But what about the children? This should be funny. But it isn't.

His poor husband doing the dirty on him?

This is a bit of a sticky wicket if you ask me. I am in the US and could endlessly post the articles that are not allowed in the UK.......

I don't know what to say because I don't really understand this sort of thing, having had far too much to do with the sleazy side of it all, which left me a trifle brain damaged on the whole subject.

But I don't like to see anyone humiliated by a cheating partner. And this just seems so much worse than normal. Although it probably isn't.

It is on the front page of the same tabloid that reported about Sleazy Ted Cruz.

His "Wife" will no doubt put up with it. But then a lot of wives do. And husbands as well, off course.

But I don't see why this should merit a Media Ban.

I've no idea what is going on. I must admit, I saw the extremely lurid front page - and ignored that bit, being far more interested in hypocritical US politicians.

I saw both!

Well, I hope E**** kicks him out. But he won't. It would cost him too much. And he probably loves the sleaze bag.

I don't know what E**** will do about D****. We must wait and see I guess......

E***** will forgive D*****, and live happy ever after. Until the next time. Seen all of this so many times in the past, when I was still engaging and still trying to understand. Believe me, there is no understanding. But it would take a whole page to explain.

I have given up now. I think that E**** is probably an okay person. But if he had asked for my opinion, I would have told him to avoid D***** like the plague. Which is likely what E*****'s mother told him.

Maybe E****'s mother knew all about the cheating all those years.......

Oh yes, there was a falling-out, wasn't there? I do hope it is dawning on the haters that their beloved 'super injunctions' are of naff-all use nowadays.

I do hope it is dawning on the haters that their beloved 'super injunctions' are of naff-all use nowaday

Unless it is their hero St. Gonc of the Piles who has one put in place.

lily wrote:Maybe E****'s mother knew all about the cheating all those years.......

It was a bit more complicated than that, Lily. She knew that her son was vulnerable, which he bloody well was, silly boy. The likes of him always are. There is a vulnerability of genuine Homosexuals that most people don't see. And she tried to protect him.

Although I would be hard pushed to believe that anyone is born like this. They aren't. It is only circumstances that make it so.

There are things about this that I know, but really don't want to talk about. Once upon a time when I was young and stupid, someone once told me what it was. He was distressed, and I didn't have the means to help him, even if I could have done.. But believe me, it is more than possible to turn an ordinary man into a homosexual.

I believe those are called bi-sexuals and there are a lot of them apparently.

lily wrote:I believe those are called bi-sexuals and there are a lot of them apparently.

No, it wasn't bisexual, Lily. But not something that I want to talk about on Forum

Totally understand, Sabot.

Hacked Off have today been branded 'rank hypocrites' after a cabinet minister was forced to admit he unknowingly had a relationship with a prostitute he met through online dating.
The BBC has also been accused of pursuing its own agenda against Culture Secretary John Whittingdale, who is currently pushing to reform the corporation and its licence fee.
News of the MP's 2014 relationship was made public last night by Newsnight in an interview with Hacked Off founder Brain Cathcart.
The Tory MP for Maldon told the programme he did not know the woman was a dominatrix and he broke it off when he discovered.
The Independent, The Sun, The Mail on Sunday and The Independent on Sunday decided not to publish, possibly because they thought it was not in the public interest and would breach his privacy.
But pro-privacy lobby group Hacked Off are furious that the MP's relationship with a woman he met on Match.com was not exposed and said newspapers had an 'obligation' to write it.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3537386/BBC-Hacked-accused-rank-hypocrites-revealing-Culture-Secretary-John-Whittingdale-s-relationship-dominatrix-met-online-dating-site.html#ixzz45hoi2kA4
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Er, what? Have Hacked Off taken leave of their senses?

Personally, I don't care what consenting grown adults do with other consenting grown adults, providing they don't frighten the horses, etc.

Actually, it's a nice change for a politician to have a relationship with a member of the opposite sex. Definitely an improvement on dead poultry.

This is, IMO, as foolish as CR trying to suppress the story about the 'celebrity' and his husband. They are NOT picking their battles wisely.

Quite.

What story? Single man has relationship with single woman, relationship ends is NOT a story.