Mirror: Sharon Osborne mouths off + UPDATE - apologises to McCanns

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1315p75-cristobell-hutton-s-latest-hate-filled-ramblings-part-3

SHE'S STILL SHOWING HOW COMPLETELY INSANE SHE IS

Yes, she doesn't half talk some pish.

I actually made myself take a look.  It would have been a mistake if it had not made me laugh.  

http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/mail-online-columnist-katie-hopkins-says-sun-banned-her-from-writing-about-madeleine-mccann/

Mail Online columnist Katie Hopkins says Sun banned her from writing about Madeleine McCann

Always the drama queen.      

1. It's abundantly clear that Hopkins knows naff-all about the case.

2. It's up to the Sun editors what they publish.

3. It's all about the Mail paying better, anyway....

On being one of Mail Online’s two paid columnists, along with Piers Morgan, she said: “The audience we pull on some of the stuff we write is off the scale. They are brave.

No, you're clickbait - the more clicks and comments, the more the Mail can charge for advertising. It has more in common with the Oldest Profession than being 'brave'.

Hopkins really should stick to stuff like-

Katie HopkinsVerified account
‏@KTHopkins
Think of the E.U. like thrush. Irritating. But easy to get rid of by shoving something in the right box. #leave

There's nothing like reasoned debate - and that's nothing like reasoned debate.

PS - I do hope all those hater trolls and numties that rush to spam Hopkins' remarks about the McCanns, under their various troll names, are aware that all they are actually doing is increasing the Mail's profits?

Oh, and are they also aware that the manipulation of the Mail's notorious red and green arrows is an open secret in the media?

ann-kristine
‏@fiorifan
#McCann Ward of Court. The parents CHOSE to make her one. If she's found she can't go home. She belongs to the State. It'll be foster care

That complete and utter moron STILL can't, or won't grasp, that Madeleine's WoC status means she's under the protection of the Crown, should she be found overseas.

This means she will be taken to the nearest British Embassy or Consulate, put on the first British Airways or Virgin flight to Heathrow, and reunited with her parents ASAP.

No-one 'belongs to the State' in the UK - that only happens in the sh*tholes that Ms Greasy Hair supports so vocally.

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=149&p=316527#p316527

Debbie Butler is an idiot - part 324

In reply to ann-kristine
Robert Carlisle ‏@RobertCarlisl10  45m45 minutes ago
@fiorifan Some kids are obviously better off away from their parents , especially ones that don't give a shit #McCann
View conversation 0 retweets 0 likes


What, kids with mothers that go on stalkerwalks round Spain, looking for 'husbands' and conning idiots into thinking they're walking 80 miles a day, when they're really on buses?

And all the while, not only are their children left at home, the stalkerwalker has abandoned her frail, elderly parents, having ripped off their pension to pay for her stalkerwalk?

That sort of 'parent' that doesn't give  a sh*t?

about: "Some kids are obviously better off away from their parents", you must be talking about the insane sharon osborne, which, obviously is not fit for the role of a mother.

Oh, there's a good few like that in the hate brigade, Pedro.

bb1, your words are mine.

http://zelo-street.blogspot.co.uk/2016/06/why-katie-hopkins-left-sun.html

Why Katie Hopkins Left The Sun
It has been one of those endlessly fascinating questions - why did pro-am motormouth Katie Hopkins and the Murdoch Sun part company? Her contract was not renewed, which was most convenient for the inmates of the Baby Shard bunker, but apart from the thought that her witterings were too toxic even for the paper of Kelvin McFilth, there was little to go on.

But now the eternally unrepentant Ms Hopkins has shed some light on the reason she and the Super Soaraway Currant Bun went their separate ways. In an article in Press Gazette, where she wheels out the old one about "I articulate views that a lot of people feel but feel that they can no longer say", she identifies the disappearance of Madeleine McCann as the one subject that neither the Sun, nor any other publication bar Mail Online, would allow her to broach.

This tells us several things not just about the sensitivities of Sun editorial staff - perhaps you thought they didn't have any - but also about the way the paper is put together nowadays, and the dangers in mentioning the McCann case.

Ms Hopkins has exhibited a tendency not merely to political incorrectness, but to give offence for what appears to be the sheer hell of it, although this may just be the disconnect between her world and the real one. Zelo Street has previously mused on the thought that some Sun pundits were not having their copy fact checked (pace Louise Mensch), and the possibility of Hatey Katey dropping the Murdoch doggies in the poo was clearly something about which they were uneasy.

Worse, most of those who scrabble around the dunghill that is Grubstreet have already overstepped the defamation line on the McCann case. So the nervousness is entirely understandable.

On top of that, there is the danger of disturbing the army of conspiracy theorists, trolls, oddballs and other assembled weirdos who prey on cases like the McCann disappearance. The pile-on from this motley convocation is something never to be forgotten.

But perhaps the most obvious reason the Sun would rather not discuss the McCann case is that there is very little of use to be gained by raking it over yet again. Katie Hopkins may have had a huge response to her latest rant on the subject, but the unedifying spectacle of a righteous and intolerant loudmouth putting the boot in on a couple who have already suffered years of torment was not one that even the Murdoch was prepared to entertain.

Whether Ms Hopkins gets that, I somehow doubt. But most human beings do - all too well.
POSTED BY TIM FENTON AT 09:50

Excellent description of the hater nutjobs.

Lots of frenzied, one-handed typing from the hate squad this morning, isn't there? Nothing gets them quite so unpleasantly excited as 'debating' stories about child abuse - to say how awful it is, of course!

Perish the thought they could be getting off on such unsavoury stuff!

http://www.stopthemyths.info/viewtopic.php?f=148&t=8617

Sir Clement Freud - Portugal

Quote:

I see the child abuse fantasists are out in force discussing their favourite subject

Oh, they're in seventh heaven today - another stick to beat the poor McCan family with, AND an excuse to dribble, yet again, about their favourite subject.

To say how appalled they are, of course! God forbid they get their jollies from 'debating' such subjects!

  Not AGAIN?

Oh, they don't actually care about the children involved in these things, Lily, they just get off on 'debating' the subject. To say how awful it is, of course!

http://davidbretisagod.forumotion.co.uk/t1315p75-cristobell-hutton-s-latest-hate-filled-ramblings-part-3

Just watch all the haters turn on Mutton as she fails to jump, slavering with excitement, on the paedo-wagon.

bb1 wrote:Oh, they don't actually care about the children involved in these things, Lily, they just get off on 'debating' the subject. To say how awful it is, of course!

Any excuse to release their inner depravity....

Yup - nothing on the hate sites except page after page of prurient speculation, grubby fantasies masquerading as debate, and repellent one-handed typing.

http://annaraccoon.com/2016/06/16/cliff-hanger-comes-to-an-end/

The one-handed typists won't like that.

I feel pleased for Cliff Richard.

The BBC's conduct, with filming that 'dawn raid' after S. Yorkshire police tipped them off, was a disgrace, frankly.

It certainly was, Bonny.  Now I hope they are all taken to the cleaners.....

The conspiraloons are having a field day today.

Oh - some very bad news for the conspiraloons and one-handed typists:

Sir Cliff Richard's child sex accuser 'is one of Britain's worst serial rapists' - yet he now gets lifelong anonymity after claiming to be a victim himself

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3646240/Sir-Cliff-Richard-s-accuser-one-Britain-s-worst-serial-rapists.html#ixzz4BpcyKlSn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

and

Anna Raccoon ‏@AnnaRaccoon1 2h2 hours ago
I'm hearing that Mark Watts of Exaro was interviewed under caution yesterday - is this true? Anybody know which force involved if so?

I think we all knew here that it was BS?