FORKERS FALL FOR ANOTHER FAKE, LOLOL

The forkers are much taken, today, with a lengthy anti-McCann, hate-filled rant by one

'Professor Doctor Stanley Collymore - academic, journalist and writer'

At last, they cry, an Eminent Person who agrees with them. A pearl beyond price, a Truthseeker indeed!

Except he isn't.

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_is_Professor_Dr_Stanley_Collymore

An anonymous blogger who uses academic titles to add weight to his tirades. His lengthy posts are characterised by extremely long sentences. His subsequent replies to correspondents are usually limited to insulting those who disagree with them by accusations of poor education, low intelligence and being sexually abused by their parents.



You would think the name alone would have been a clue.....Stan Collymore not ring any bells? No?




The real Stan is nothing like the pretendy professor, who not only enjoys anti-McCann rants, but also enjoys anti-Semitic rants, anti-American rants...well, you get the picture.

Just another fraudulent, ranting nutjob, in fact.

No wonder the forkers are all so taken with their latest Pied Piper.

ABOUT ME

PROF. DR. STANLEY COLLYMORE
I'm a highly intelligent, articulate and well-educated human being with an intuitive but enterprising sense of responsibility and a strong moral compass that instinctively demarcates what's right and wrong. Trust, confidentiality and having the courage, regardless of what I do, to formulate and stand by my own personal convictions are key aspects of my life and, unsurprisingly, are also principal characteristics I attach great importance to and naturally expect from those who want to play a meaningful role in my life. I don't suffer fools gladly and most definitely haven’t got any interest in or time for egotists, time-wasters, attention seekers or the narcissistic.

You couldn't make it up, Lily. It didn't even dawn on the Truthseekers and Researchers that there was something a bit odd about the ranter's name.

And then they wonder why people laugh at them

I wonder how long it will take them to delete anything about him?

Forker on MM:

On reflection, the article is libellous and let"s hope the McCann spies do not see it.

Why would that be? I didn't think anything could top yesterday's non-apology for entertainment, but the spectacle of the forkers being taken in by yet another fake Messiah is even better

Speaking of stupid, which is worse?

silkcut says:

hotrod says:
Nite nite Silky, I'll see you in my dreams!
-
your lying twisting b*lls will be roasted before then - i eat men like you and spew them out before breakfast when they deserve it thats ok ive been KIND to you on the whole for which you SHOULD be thankful you know lol you fkn plank of a nobody youre a disgrace to men all in all god sake no one would like to be like you you fkn arris

ps btw HI BRAINLESS MONKEYS LOL always nice to see you

can you actually speak? wonder why not, i wonder why you press the buttons, what will it take to convince you that the mccanns have screwed your a*se its true you know how do you feel about that not good hopefully oh well they won you lost
x
Reply to this post
Permalink | Report abuse | Ignore this customer
6 of 16 people think this post adds to the discussion. Do you

=============

Is it the creature who spouted that abuse? Or the six who think that that adds to discussion?

Forkers are all the same

Is it the creature who spouted that abuse? Or the six who think that that adds to discussion?

Match made in heaven....

Oh look, another mug's fallen for it:

OriginalShuBob Tim Tomasz
#McCann -I wonder what Carter-Ruck will make of this quite frankly astonishing blog entry: politicoacademic.blogspot.com/2011/12/bury-t…


Probably too busy laughing at the gullible forkers to care

And ShuBob maintains her unbroken record of being 100% wrong, 100% of the time

Posted by: ShuBob on December 29, 2011 11:24 AMGood heavens! What will Carter-Ruck make of this rather astonishing blog entry:

http://www.politicoacademic.blogspot.com/2011/12/bury-this-mccann-crap-along-with.html

Who is this person?



He's a notorious ranting nutjob who has awarded himself fake qualifications and nicked the name of a famous footballer, dear.

Next!

They manage it every time. But I suppose it does give them "hope".

And the utterly stupid "Aiyoyo" is suitably impressed.

n November 3, 2009 at 11:57 am Jake-413451 Aka the good doctor [3] said:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Discuss:Who_is_Professor_Dr_Stanley_Collymore

I am not surprised to have these responses, they are in keeping with other responses surrounding this user name. I attempted to give the only rational and truthful answer that I believe can be claimed. There is no proof the account name is solely the use of one person, so claims assuming that are faulty to begin with. The relative popularity, or lack thereof, of any other material I've written is irrelevant for determining who, or more accurately what, the subject of this question is. Now how about this. Now I'll freely admit I had this site pointed out to me and thus I came here and found an very interesting, and completely off-topic answer to the question, which is why my contributions are so few. But I find it interesting that those who have seen fit to detract all made their accounts at the same time and all have only posted here. Even I found the time to reply to at least one other question. Oh, you do know the answer the question is still who (what) is Prof Dr. S ... not Jake-413451. How about we not go on off-topic rants any more.





(7) On October 26, 2009 at 6:23 pm Moobler [339] said:


Note: Moobler merged "Who is Professor Stanley Collymore?"0"Who is Professor Dr Stanley Collymore?".
See the Discussion for "Who is Professor Stanley Collymore?"





(6) On October 26, 2009 at 5:49 pm Nonzionist [1] said:


How many times do you drive into a cul de sac to take a short cut to work Jake?

Jake has been exceedingly busy writing and talking to himself and making no impact it seems as it's patently obvious he has nothing to say and is simply clutching at straws.

If Professor Collymore doesn't exist and is nothing more than a collection of sock-puppets (cute American word not generally known in the UK or Europe) why does he expend so much time and energy on this non-existent person?

To use a Shakespearean term - but I doubt very much if Jake has ever heard of him either - "methinks the lady doth protest too much."

Hundreds of sock-puppets Jake to debunk the ludicrous notion you posited in one of your Newsvine articles that the Red Indians had no claim to North America because Christopher Columbus, a European, was there first, yet all the empirical data - and this was pointed out unsuccessfully to you - clearly shows that Christopher Columbus never set foot on the North American continent because he never knew it existed; and one can't discover something that is already known to others as North America, which it became, was not only known to but inhabited for thousands of years by the indigenous people of that continent who had migrated across the Bering Straits, then a land bridge, from Asia to their new home.

But why allow facts to get in the way of ignorance, eh Jake? Similarly, everyone who has an email account or is a member and contributor to an online medium, be that a newspaper or a specific organ like Huffington Post, Newsvine or whatever, knows unfortunately that it's perfectly easy to forget to logout because one simply forgets to do so, the computer crashes or they were in a rush or for some other valid reason.

When that happens the account is left open and therefore at the mercy of anyone who is of a mind to misuse it. And having checked the link that Jake has referred to an apathetic and paltry audience that consists largely of himself - look at the many entries he has mounted yet has only become a member since the 23 October 2008, a regular feature of his in criticizing those who are new members to Newsvine but who attack or debunk what he says - and just a few others - one doesn't have to have the brains of a rocket scientist to see the motives behind this rant of his and I'd bet you an English Pound Sterling to a penny that he'd lambaste those like myself who were drawn to his rant and felt that some balance and commonsense were needed in this farcical lynching of Professor Collymore who seemingly doesn't give a damn about him or his ilk and are ourselves new members to Wiki answers, will unsurprisingly by Jake be labelled as sock puppets as well. And since I can only speak for myself frankly I don't care. Nor will I produce links from bigoted and propagandistic sites to justify a point or support this classic idiot.

Tell me in all honesty, what intelligent person with his name blazoned as the writer by the internet medium and who doesn't use a pseudonym would be so stupid or crass to post a response to any article knowing that his response carries his name, then at the bottom of his post place, even unintentionally, the name of someone else. Wouldn't it make much more sense to sign out first and start all over again, or use that particular sock puppet if it existed? But logical thought and commonsense isn't the strong suit of the likes of Jake. He and his fellow zionists all work on the principle that if one says something loud and often enough others will eventually take up that particular refrain and pass it on as the unvarnished truth. And sadly there are many ill-informed, gullible and stupid persons who do just that.

One has only got to look at the number of them who enthusiastically went along with all the lies over the Iraq had weapons of mass destruction lunacy and who are willingly allowing themselves to be conned once more in respect of Iran. People who need to find someone to demonize because their sad lives lack substance. Jake is, it seems, one such computer nerd and frankly should get a life, providing of course he knows how to embark on such a simple venture.

So I'll ask again Jake, and the same applies to those inclined to believe you without a shred of evidence to corroborate anything you say - and that link you referred to as a clear example you claim of sock-puppetry is ages old, so why use it now and out of context? - HOW MANY TIMES DO YOU DRIVE INTO A CUL DE SAC TO TAKE A SHORT CUT TO WORK?[u]

If Professor Collymore doesn't exist and is nothing more than a collection of sock-puppets (cute American word not generally known in the UK or Europe) why does he expend so much time and energy on this non-existent person?

Really? Bennett's site is sock central

And someone has led a very sheltered life if they don't know who the real Stan Collymore is...

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/football/8975217/Stan-Collymore-calls-on-Twitter-to-clamp-down-on-racism-after-Luis-Suarez-Patrice-Evra-case.html



Doc Prof is just another fakeblogger.

Another hatermug:

silkcut says:
Bloody hell , long but worth a read

http://politicoacademic.blogspot.com/

Perfect.

Jayelles wrote:Thick and jealous.

Re: Is this a Sun Apology to David Bret?
  jd Yesterday at 4:23 pm

He was always calling them 'doctors' to make them in the public eye as Professional people.

Yes, that would be because they ARE doctors and professional people.

Re: Is this a Sun Apology to David Bret?
  sharonl Yesterday at 4:16 pm

... what right does Kate have to be referred to as Dr?

*speechless*

Re: Is this a Sun Apology to David Bret?
  tigger Today at 6:44 pm


...Kate hasn't published anything,

Apart from that bestseller...

Re: Is this a Sun Apology to David Bret?
  jd Yesterday at 3:54 pm

Leveson is performing to a script, total wimp of a man. I love the way he kept calling the mccanns 'doctors' ......not parents of a missing child

 

The goons seem to understand each other...

You have to laugh about the irony of it, though, Jayelles. There they are, getting all hot and bothered because the McCanns are real, qualified, doctors...

When only this morning, they were all at some nutjob who had cloned the name of a footballer and stuck, Doctor Professor, in front of it...

You couldn't make it up.

And the Prof. has been around the Internet since 2009.

Usually with 10,000 word racist rants about 'Zionists' and Americans....nice company the forkers keep.